The British Nationalist

A few years ago, during the ‘December rebellion’ I tried to stay impartial, as to get a clear view of the situation, and as I had friends on both sides. In fact it may surprise SOME people that I am STILL friends with Colin Auty.

Nothing to do with what he or I politically believe, but the fact that we actually get on with each other.

Anyway one thing that stood out during the conflict to me was that they (the said rebels) posted a video of Mark Collett getting threatened by some Nutzis, and clearly in distress. Now whether you disagree with someone, or if you don’t even like them, showing a video like that in a public place not only made me cringe but destroyed any respectability to their cause.

I am glad it did.

Whilst surfing the net I came across this old article.

Take special note of the bits I have highlighted.

Membership List Leak – A Response

It is unfortunate that a response has to be made regarding the disgusting accusations emanating from the lie filled mouth of Nick Griffin, yet in order to set the record straight we feel that a response is indeed necessary.

Firstly we would like to point out that the publication of the BNP membership list is a treacherous act which will have repercussions for the entire Party and nationalism in general. Whoever has done this should be utterly ashamed of their spiteful actions. Whatever the reasons for the publication of the list, ordinary BNP members should not have to suffer because of the crass incompetence, flawed personality and arrogance of the Party Leader.

The BNP website carries an “urgent update” from the BNP leader, Nick Griffin. This update blatantly accuses those involved in the December 2007 dispute, which had its source concern expressed by several leading Party members and senior officials over the disgraceful protection by the Chairman of two individuals who had brought and continue to bring the Party into disrepute and heap embarrassment through their incompetence, immaturity and selfish behaviour. Griffin, a man who like so many contemptible politicians can be detected lying when his mouth open’s hardly conceals his ill-founded and thoroughly false suspicions that Kenny Smith, the previous Head of Administration, of being responsible for the publication. This is a disgrace and a downright lie. None of the six people involved in the April 2007 court case want to see the BNP suffer at all. Moreover, they certainly do not want to see the thoroughly decent members and activists suffer at the hands of filthy communist scum. Seeing Nick Griffin get his deserved comeuppance is one thing, harming the Party is completely different. Neither Kenny Smith, nor any of the other co-defendants who Griffin and Darby took to court leaked/published the database.

Nick Griffin has clearly landed himself in very hot water by alleging that the publication of the list proves ‘Contempt of Court’. He says that the web host’s legal department has been contacted by the BNP and that the BNP are liaising with their solicitors about how to use this against the six defendants in the ongoing court action.
We would dearly like to see the BNP find out who did this and we would like to see them brought to book. When the real culprit is found we will be expecting a full public apology from Griffin, with damages for the smearing of our names.

In reality, the publication of the membership lists simply shows the contempt in which Griffin holds the BNP membership. By allowing gross inefficiencies in BNP departments (which was the main reason behind the December crisis whereby sickened national officials could not take any more incompetence from two departments and were sacked for speaking out) Griffin is to blame. The fact that up to a dozen (possibly more?) people may have, or have had a full database is bad enough when the database is the BNP’s prize asset. However, the real problem is that Nick Griffin has such a terrible record for falling out with senior BNP officials who criticise him in any way that the list of his enemies is seemingly endless. Because of the way in which Griffin treats those who have given their all for the BNP, he creates a rod for his own back in that some people (in this case misguidedly) may do things which damage the BNP in an attempt to attack Griffin himself.

Further, the rather arrogant way in which the BNP web team and Griffin himself dismiss the membership leak as ‘a publicity bonus’ is truly shocking when you consider that many members and activists with a sensitive job have now been exposed to violent communist bully boys and their backers at Searchlight and UAF. We have already had calls from people who have had such threatening calls and our sympathies go out to them. For Griffin to brush this off, and to wrongly claim that ‘former employees’ were to blame is beneath contempt. Griffin has once again shown just how little he really thinks of the everyday BNP member.

We suggest that the Party Chairman:

1.) Immediately apologises to the six court defendants (who have never been found guilty of anything despite the malicious Griffin/Darby prosecution) and to Kenny Smith in particular.

2.) Actually contacts Dyfed-Powys Police rather than just pretending so, in order to start the ball rolling as to who did actually leak the list.

3.) Actually contacts the web host’s legal department and gets them to shut down the offending websites.

4.) Starts to act in the interests of the members and not operate once more in a zone of self-survival which leads to utter contempt for the feelings of the average BNP member.

Just a little food for thought on how close we nearly came to bowing to the wishes of these people. Let’s make sure we’re not naive enough to let it happen again.

By Joey Smith

Following on from GA’s article about nationalist sites linking each other etc, I notice that there are still only 16 of our BNP supporting sites listed in the Total Politics blog directory.

Myself and GA have have called for blog owners to register their sites on this big traffic generating site, but to no avail it seems, bar 5 or 6 blogs. Even UKIP has 29 blogs registered, and apart from one or two, all their support sites are a pile of dung.

There are around 40 pro-BNP sites that are yet to get themselves listed in the directory, most of them are in the regional nationalists list on this site. Getting yourself listed on a search engine isn’t enough, Google can only generate so many visitors.

None of the more official BNP blogs (sites run by officials) carry any links at all. Well, fine, but this site does not link any sites that refuse to reciprocate. Sites without any links at all consider themselves ‘too good’ and don’t need to build up outgoing and incoming links, or the owner is technologically retarded. Only, none of the BNP support sites have traffic figures that indicate no need to build up internal traffic – Simon Darby’s and GA’s being the most visited, the former site could have a higher rating, but I refuse to link it without receiving the same courtesy.

I think it all comes down to the argument about content, BNP bloggers can’t be trusted not to write something that will tar other sites by association. That’s an insult to most of us. We don’t receive payment for generating all this interest for the party, we’re outnumbered heavily by the amount of Tory/Labour blogs, and consistently punch above our weight. A little bit of acknowledgement wouldn’t go amiss, maybe an offer to link back,  it would be nice. We’ve got a massive year ahead of us, the BNP blog network could mean the difference between a candidate becoming a BNP member of parliament or us uttering empty words about coming second.

Go here, get your blog put into the BNP directory, let’s overtake UKIP.

It seems The Times journalists have been trawling the Stormfront forum – with no official BNP forum – they are reduced to delving into that garbage purveyor to gauge BNP members and supporters reactions to Question Time. The Times refers to a poll which asks ‘Should Griffin step down as BNP Chairman?‘, with 32 saying yes against 79 saying no.

“Yesterday supporters expressed their anger on Stormfront, a nationalist forum with the logo “White Pride Worldwide”. In a poll of more than 100 members, 30 per cent said that Mr Griffin should be replaced. Scores more have used the website to criticise his appearance on the programme, labelling it “disastrous”.

One, writing as “Smith”, said: “The facts are thus: we aren’t winning, QT didn’t help, it just made us look stupid and the intelligent amongst us want Griffin replaced.”

Another, Doriot, said: “To me is seems pretty obvious that the party has gone as far as it can under his leadership.”

It is far from being a good indicator of opinion, but as we know, journalists will attempt to infer from the most tenuous of sources.

1.) Stormfront is an unofficially proscribed forum, no decent BNP member uses it.

2.) It is known to be infested with communist troublemakers. Any polls are influenced by these elements.

3.) Several Stormfront users are disgruntled ex-BNP members, hardcore Nazis and good candidates for mental health confinement, hardly the best group of people to poll.

4.) Virulent anti-Griffin people moderate the forum, in particular, the elderly Tyndall lover ‘Old Knight’.

The Times offers up Andrew Brons MEP, Martin Wingfield and Simon Darby as alternatives. It’s nothing more than an ill-judged attempt to create the internal division that the Times claims already exists. If somebody wants to replace Nick Griffin they can come forward and explain how they would have handled Question Time differently, yes Nick has baggage, and he has acknowledged that this will represent a glass ceiling limiting how far he can take us, but would you sacrifice Nick’s qualities for a ‘clean’ leader with no ability?

Victim: Dr Andrew Glover
The hardcore communists of Unite Against ‘Fascism’ have demanded the sacking of a lecturer whom they believe to be a BNP member.

Visiting music conductor Andrew Glover of Birmingham University has been singled out by the anti-democratic group who said: “Members of the fascist BNP should not be allowed into our education system.

“We demand that Andrew Glover be removed from his role at Birmingham City University.”

How the hard-left organisation claim to know Dr Glover’s private political beliefs is not clear, however, possession of the outdated BNP membership list is illegal.

Simon Darby, deputy leader of the BNP, said: “It is quite ironic that an organisation that professes to be against fascism is insisting that someone who holds political views different to theirs should be sacked.

“I think people across Birmingham and the wider West Midlands will see this.

“It is vindictive, almost medieval behaviour, similar to a witchhunt.

“All people have different political views but you don’t bring them into a professional body.

“He is merely a member, or an alleged member, of the BNP and is being driven from his job as a result.”

A spokesman for Birmingham City University said it took its duty of care to staff and students seriously.

“The university, therefore, accepts that the political beliefs of its staff are a private matter. But we also want to make clear that if such views affect that person’s work and professional relationships then the university will consider its response.”

Dr Glover is a specialist in Composition, Music history (20th Century) ,World Music
(Celtic, Middle Eastern), Aesthetics and Teaching. He has won numerous awards in the USA, Poland and Italy.