The British Nationalist

Last night’s meeting of the BNP’s Croydon branch, attracted some ethnic minority pub-goers. The two men were peering through the window, wondering why the large crowd were gathering, upon being spotted, some elderly BNP veterans waved for them to come in and join the meeting.

The two men – one asian; one afro-carribean – enjoyed the talks by Richard Barnbrook AM, and had lots of questions. One being: “how can we get this country back to the way it was?”

The Asian gentleman explained that he was a British army veteran, which was greeted by a warm, respectful applause from the BNP members.

A member present at the meeting, reports:

“He also said he had a mixed race child and he does not like political correctness, they were asked to become members at a later date, i’m not sure if they will.  I think they were quite happy to a stumbled apon a BNP meeting, something to talk about with their mates. I think they were very curious and hopefully came away with the knowledge that the BNP are very different as to how they are portrayed in the MSM, on my way out I gave one of them one of my DVD’s, me and my mate make them, it is a newspaper in a DVD format, presenting news that is censored in the MSM, anyway he was happy with that and said he’d watch.

They were made very welcome, who said the BNP can’t be inclusive?”

I know some are worried about how they will manage ethnic minority members. The answer is simple, the answer is contained within the BNP’s philosophy towards ethnic minorities; treat them exactly the same as you would any other member, no condescending lovefest and certainly nothing that would constitute bad manners. Common sense stuff.

A very small minority may stop coming to meetings if ethnic minorities attend. I would question how on earth they function in a multi-racial society (you may not like it, but it’s a fact of life for most people living in large cities) if they cannot even bring themselves to sit next to an ethnic minority. Have their careers never once brought them into contact with minority customers or colleagues? If so, did they shun or run from them, rather than engage?

Some have foretold large invasions of meetings by searchlight plants. You can counter this by making all your meetings strictly members only, no card; no entry, regardless of race, ethnicity, etc.

This could all turn out to be academic as the amendments are yet to be ratified by the membership. If you wish to vote on the constitutional amendments then you must attend the Emergency General Meeting on the 30th/31st of January 2010.

Hat-tip: Political Mizz

We know that trade unions are often mobilised to interfere in our democracy, particularly when the BNP is standing. So it comes as no surprise that a local Unison member in Barking and Dagenham is going to be fighting the BNP there.

You will no doubt have some idea of what the virulently anti-BNP Unison gets up to. Supposedly, allowing hope not hate, searchlies et al, free use of their call-centre facilities. One member allegedly traced nuisance phone calls back to a Unison facility.

Louise Couling is a lollypop woman, or crossing officer (as I imagine she likes to be called), she is also a member of the London branch of Unison and has a position on the National Executive Council (NEC).

According to Labourlist:

Louise describes herself as an ordinary working class trade unionist who fiercely represents her predominantly low-paid women members. She is also a super-proud true Brit who hates fascism.

This is normally translated as lower class, uneducated, very left-wing and thinks Fascism is anything right of themselves; which just happens to be everything when you’re that far left. Having spent some time around the Labour scene, I know what these lot are like. Usually stinking filthy, with yellow teeth, cat hair on their clothes and rather fond of the booze. That’s your average Liebore bag lady. Not to menti0n that most of them were young communists, before they learned to conceal their beliefs.

Richard is running for election to Barking & Dagenham council, instead of parliament, and should be successful, having been one of the most well-known and liked politicians in the area. If the party captures the council Richard is expected to be installed as the first BNP council leader.

This mouldy ragamuffin should offer no stiff challenge to the seasoned BNP activists of B & D, despite the plotting between Liebore and (E)UKIP.

UKIP’s London Chairman Paul Wiffen took great delight in telling me that I was lying about everything in the last article, I must have just made it all up off the top of my head.

They have actually dumped poor Winston Mckenzie and gone for the rabid gay-hater, failed footballer, failed jockey, one-time chef and boxing manager Frank Maloney. Nobody knew about this development, apart from very few of the mugs in (E)UKIP.

Maloney stood in the 2004 London mayoralty election, securing 6.19% of the vote and fourth place. During this very campaign, he refused to canvass Camden because there were ‘too many gays’.

The ponces of the UKIP London hierarchy probably think Maloney’s non-PC outbursts will endear him to the indigenous folks of Barking – the ones that haven’t been ethnically cleansed, yet. We’ll see, maybe Wiffen can make a documentary about it.

We hope he is ready to take on the BNP-Machine, after all, it was only two months ago that he suffered a heart attack. No Mercy, prepare to be crushed, Maloney.

(Gay BNP supporters are urged to participate in the Barking Campaign)

UKIP insiders are claiming that political chameleon Winston Mckenzie is putting himself forward as the candidate to take on Nick Griffin for the Barking parliamentary seat.

The former boxer, landlord and hairdresser who has been a member of Labour, Liberal Democrats, UKIP, Veritas, Conservatives and founder of the now defunct Unity Party is up against Paul Wiffen for the nomination, UKIP’s London Chairman.

UKIP members have asked why the party is standing against another EU withdrawalist in a seat they have little chance of winning. However, it was revealed that UKIP has a history of working with the local Labour party to split the BNP’s vote. Labour activists were even used to deliver UKIP literature, and the party put up 12 candidates specifically in the Barking and Dagenham wards contested by the BNP in 2006.

The plot thickens, de-facto leader of UKIP’s Barking and Dagenham branch is Kenny Smith, whose brother just happens to to be Liam Smith, the boss of the local Labour group and River Ward councillor.

Given the nature of UKIP’s duplicity it would not be surprising if the BNP stood a candidate against Nigel Farage, who plans to oust the speaker of the house of commons John Bercow in Buckingham. This would seriously lengthen the odds of the contest returning UKIP’s first MP.

Mckenzie is a prize fool, but he is also Black. UKIP will trade on his ethnicity, playing up the contest as some sort of battle between the lovely ethnic minority vs the evil BNP leader whom wants to send him home to Jamaica. The press will love it.

Credit where it is due, Mckenzie was one of the very few London Mayoralty candidates that didn’t walk off the stage when Richard Barnbrook made his victory speech.

This polling research below was backed by, and produced for, political betting. As I have said before, within reason, those who have money to put where their mouths are have less of an axe to grind and are closer to what is really happening.

Nationally the BNP are on 5% but this includes weak areas. But for the North the BNP has grown to 8%! Maybe this should be an area in which the BNP concentrate.

At present all sorts of rumours are abound, and the main focus of the BNP is towards Barking, and with good reason because as stated HERE You will see the move upwards in support for the BNP and steep decline for Labour making winning the seat a real possibility.

But what of other seats? We have our two MEP’s from the North West and Yorkshire and Humberside regions. I don’t think it is beyond the realms of possibility that we have Nick Griffin elected for Barking and at least another candidate elected from another seat, we do need to not just focus on Barking though but look at the whole of the UK. The euro elections are good for one purpose they give every voter in the UK a chance to vote BNP. At this election I think we should give as many voters as possible a chance to vote BNP, by having as many candidates as possible. Lets see what happens.

By Election Correspondent

Here follows an intercepted email from Mike Easter, member of the British National Party (BNP) reform group. You may recall that the odious activities of the reform group were covered in an earlier article here. Chris Jackson – the leader of the group and would-be fuhrer of the BNP – has since claimed that he is going to join the National Front (NF).

Hi,

Since writing the attached, the BNP accounts are still not in to the Electoral Commission.  Also Griffin has been consorting with Fiore and other foreigners of very dubious reputation.  He is now making certain that the BNP General Election campaign in Barking, where Richard Barnbrook was to stand, will be a fiasco.  NG has deserted the North West almost as soon as he was elected.

Some people have actually already transfered to the NF including Steve Smith of Burnley fame.

Others are waiting to hear the result of a NF directorate meeting on 5th December at which, we hope, Ian Edward will be confirmed as NF Chairman.

Ian, I am sure he won’t mind me saying, is a steady lad and intends to keep to the NF Constitution.

This Constitution is just the one that the BNP should have, but hasn’t.

Regards,

Mike Easter

Attachment

The situation is currently very confused for nationalists. (Perhaps less confusing now that Griffin has come out of the closet!)  There is no apparent best option.   All options have serious downsides.  Let’s consider the following:

1.  Continue in the BNP and attempt to reform it.

2.  Rejoin the NF, effectively transferring the trained personnel from the BNP into the NF.

3.  Go with Dem Nats.

4.  Do nothing.

The BNP is by far the largest of the nationalist groups. However, it suffers from having a dictatorial structure consequent on its ludicrous Constitution. It has a very high turnover of members and most members are unschooled in nationalist politics. Indeed it is now becoming difficult to describe it as a racial nationalist party.

The NF is tiny but has, over the last year or two, grown appreciably. It does have a proper Constitution and that potentially means that it can grow and develop in a satisfactory way. (The de facto leader is now Ian Edward.)

The Democratic Nationalists is effectively a ‘shell’ and has very limited membership but is registered with the Electoral Commission. It has a Constitution that would allow for growth and development.

Before making a personal decision, I would like to get a feeling for others opinions. My feeling is that the BNP is going nowhere. Consequently, making an enormous effort to reform the BNP, remove dud personnel and then train the members in nationalism will be time and energy wasted.

The NF is very small but contains well motivated nationalists and has a Constitution that allows for the party to grow and is controlled by the members.

The Democratic Nationalists seem to be in a similar situation to the NF but only just starting out.

I have deliberately not mentioned individuals in this brief note. However, in the cases of the NF, and also the DNs, it would be possible at the respective annual general meetings to remove individuals from positions of authority, who are in some way unsatisfactory. This has not been possible in the case of the BNP due to its Constitution.

Personally, I am inclined to put my effort into the NF because, first of all they are genuine racial nationalists, and secondly they potentially can grow rapidly if the long term BNP members, including those that have been thrown out by Griffin, join them. These are people already trained.

‘Dem Nats’ refers to the independent nationalist candidates that the reform group intends to stand against BNP candidates in the general election, under the Democratic Nationalist label. Some Dem Nat candidates have already been selected to stand in Bradford and Burnley.

Point 1 is the option that the reform group is currently employing, subversive tactics laid out in the infamous six point plan. We’re hearing of some bizarre little games being played out at recent BNP meetings in the North; showing of hands, people storming out of rooms.  A bemused member whom attended one of the meetings and witnessed Jackson’s latest stunt, said:

‘He (Jackson) launched into a tirade about Nick Griffin, and at the end asked us if we still supported the leader or him, only about 12 out of 60 people put their hand up for him. He said that when he got to power he’d hang all those whom voted for the amendments. We’re calling him Wacko Jacko, he’s losing the plot.’

The NF appears to be ecstatic at the moment. It seems that members of the National Front’s directorate –  a member of which is the hilariously inept Eddy Morrison – are under pressure to select the ‘right’ chairman, before any of the reform group will join them, they’re holding the NF to ransom, not the best way to enter into a new alliance. A source tells us that whomever is selected will be considered as somebody who is easily cast aside when Chris Jackson decides he wants to become the Chairman.

The NF are claiming that they’re going to see a big increase in membership, mainly driven by dissatisfaction amongst the nutzis about the upcoming BNP member ballot on the constitutional amendments. The vote is expected to favour the proposals offered by Nick Griffin. The party has confirmed that despite the amendments our ethno-nationalist ideology, and our policies, will remain intact. What’s the problem?

Well, BNP members and supporters should not be fooled. These people are not threatening to leave because of the constitutional amendments forced on us by the establishment, they are people with a pathological hatred of the current leadership, and especially Nick Griffin. They have been sitting in a run-down pub, belittling the success of the party and praying for Nick to trip up, in some cases they have been waiting for that day for 30 years. They can wait on, preferably from the politically insignificant sidelines of the National Front.

Lady Margaret Hodge will attempt to hold on to her Barking seat at the next general election, she will be up against one of the most well-known politicians of this century. Love or hate Nick Griffin, he is instantly recognisable to the public. Hodge has repeatedly reduced her winning majority at each general election since 1997.

• 1944 - Born in Cairo, Egypt. Her father was an extremely wealthy German steel magnate.
• 1966 – She had a privileged education, attending two public schools. Obtained a 3rd class Batchelor’s degree in economics from the prestigious London School of Economics (LSE).
• 1973 - Becomes a Labour councillor in Islington, London. Established Labour councillors view her as one of a raft of middle-class activists taking over their party. She was quickly raised to Chair of the housing committee.
• 1982 – Elected as Council Leader, a position she would hold for ten years.
• 1983-1992 Her leadership is compared to Albanian communist despot Enver Hoxha. Her council was criticised for taking 5 years to respond to a letter which contained allegations of child abuse whilst the writer was in council care.
• 1992 – Resigns after The Evening Standard investigates claims of child abuse occurring in Islington’s child care facilities. Pursues a career as a consultant for Price Waterhouse.

At this point, a healthy democratic society would have ensured that this woman was never allowed to obtain any public office again. Having demonstrated a lack of ability as council leader.

• 1994 - Elected as the MP for Barking with 13,704 votes (72.1%) and a 11,414 majority.
• 1997 – Re-elected to parliament with 21,698 votes (65.82%) and a 15,896 majority.
• 1998 – Becomes a Junior Minister as Parliamentary under-secretary of state for education and employment.
• 2001 – Re-elected to parliament with 15,302 votes (60.9%) on a reduced majority of 9,534.  Becomes Minister for Universities in the Department for Education and Skills.
• 2003 – Becomes member of the Privy Council and Minister for Children.
• 2004 Privacy International award her the ‘Big Brother Award’, in recognition of her backing of the intrusive Universal Child Database.
• 2005 – Re-elected to parliament with 13,826 votes (47.8%) with a further reduced majority of 8,883. Appointed Minister for State.
• 2006 – Criticised for supposedly saying that sacked MG Rover technicians could get jobs at Tesco. Appointed to the Department for Trade and Industry.
• 2007 – Appointed Minister for Culture, Creative Industries and Tourism.
• 2008 - Resigned Ministerial position.
• 2009 – Thoroughly beaten in a TV debate with Andrew Brons, the newly elected BNP MEP for Yorkshire and Humberside. Appointed Minister for Culture and Tourism.

Voting Record Since 2001

• Has never voted on a transparent Parliament.
• Voted for introducing a smoking ban.
• Voted for introducing ID cards.
• Voted for introducing foundation hospitals.
• Voted for introducing student top-up fees.
• Voted for Labour’s anti-terrorism laws.
• Voted for the Iraq war.
• Voted against investigating the Iraq war.
• Voted for replacing Trident.
• Voted for the hunting ban.
• Voted for equal gay rights.

The channel 4 debate which featured Andrew Brons MEP, and Hodge, showed her up for a pinhead. She’s not a very bright woman, and I suspect she will avoid a confrontation with Nick Griffin, lest he embarrass her in exactly the manner that communist Labour traitor politicians deserve.

The British National Party’s London Assembly Member Richard Barnbrook and Joey Smith letting their hair down.

Well worth a watch.