The British Nationalist

Well, despite what the mass media are reporting, the British National Party are open for business and taking new membership applications.

The Judge has demanded two pieces of the new constitution changed within 30 days from today. Nick immediately edited one of the sections of the constitution which he had the power to do, however, the other section is write protected. It cannot be amended except by the membership.

This means that the party will probably call an Emergency General Meeting (EGM) within the next 30 days, in order to amend the constitution once again, and satisfy London County Court.

If the party can convert all potential members on the waiting list into full members, we’re looking at a capital investment somewhere in the region of £210,000. Of course, £60,000 of this money is earmarked for the coffers of the odious EHRC.

Other News

Other BNP bloggers don’t like talking about ‘bad news’ and would probably ask me to shut up about this, but I believe the news below should wake up some of our folks. The NF is now actively encouraging our members and supporters to defect, that makes them a political enemy. There’s no point pretending that it isn’t happening.

Rotherham borough  BNP Councillor John Gamble has defected to the National Front (NF). He is probably the NF’s first elected official in 30 years, if not longer. Gamble is up for re-election in 2012, when, I hope, the BNP will claim this seat back from the turncoat.

300 of the BNP membership voted yes to constitutional amendments allowing ethnic minorities to join the party.

Good.

As for the opponents, they’re now trying to claim that the motion couldn’t have been carried because thousands of members did not vote. It was a party-wide ballot; they knew where the EGM was to be held. Claiming that Northern members couldn’t get down to the south is laughable, if it was held in the North, how would the Southern members attend?

It has been revealed that the Conservatives and Labour had planned to cooperate to keep BNP leader Nick Griffin out of parliament. Tory strategists had agreed to not stand a candidate against Nick, only changing their mind when ‘anti-fascists’ warned them what a stupid idea it was.

“Under the proposal, the Tories would have agreed not to put up a candidate against Mrs Hodge in the hope of giving her a better chance of defeating the far-right party leader at the next general election.

But the plan was killed off after anti-fascist group Searchlight said that the pact could backfire by fuelling Mr Griffin’s victim status.”

Yet more proof of the close-knit relations between the tweedle-dee, tweedle dum parties, and the sham democratic system in the UK. Standing against Nick in a straight forward, democratic battle is apparently out of the question. Just in case they don’t agree with the results of the electorate exercising their democratic rights – and Nick Griffin wins.

This probably would have backfired, and unfortunately, Gerry Gable has been in this game a long time.

http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/713/davidcameronspactwithgo.jpg

A few years ago, during the ‘December rebellion’ I tried to stay impartial, as to get a clear view of the situation, and as I had friends on both sides. In fact it may surprise SOME people that I am STILL friends with Colin Auty.

Nothing to do with what he or I politically believe, but the fact that we actually get on with each other.

Anyway one thing that stood out during the conflict to me was that they (the said rebels) posted a video of Mark Collett getting threatened by some Nutzis, and clearly in distress. Now whether you disagree with someone, or if you don’t even like them, showing a video like that in a public place not only made me cringe but destroyed any respectability to their cause.

I am glad it did.

Whilst surfing the net I came across this old article.

Take special note of the bits I have highlighted.

Membership List Leak – A Response

It is unfortunate that a response has to be made regarding the disgusting accusations emanating from the lie filled mouth of Nick Griffin, yet in order to set the record straight we feel that a response is indeed necessary.

Firstly we would like to point out that the publication of the BNP membership list is a treacherous act which will have repercussions for the entire Party and nationalism in general. Whoever has done this should be utterly ashamed of their spiteful actions. Whatever the reasons for the publication of the list, ordinary BNP members should not have to suffer because of the crass incompetence, flawed personality and arrogance of the Party Leader.

The BNP website carries an “urgent update” from the BNP leader, Nick Griffin. This update blatantly accuses those involved in the December 2007 dispute, which had its source concern expressed by several leading Party members and senior officials over the disgraceful protection by the Chairman of two individuals who had brought and continue to bring the Party into disrepute and heap embarrassment through their incompetence, immaturity and selfish behaviour. Griffin, a man who like so many contemptible politicians can be detected lying when his mouth open’s hardly conceals his ill-founded and thoroughly false suspicions that Kenny Smith, the previous Head of Administration, of being responsible for the publication. This is a disgrace and a downright lie. None of the six people involved in the April 2007 court case want to see the BNP suffer at all. Moreover, they certainly do not want to see the thoroughly decent members and activists suffer at the hands of filthy communist scum. Seeing Nick Griffin get his deserved comeuppance is one thing, harming the Party is completely different. Neither Kenny Smith, nor any of the other co-defendants who Griffin and Darby took to court leaked/published the database.

Nick Griffin has clearly landed himself in very hot water by alleging that the publication of the list proves ‘Contempt of Court’. He says that the web host’s legal department has been contacted by the BNP and that the BNP are liaising with their solicitors about how to use this against the six defendants in the ongoing court action.
We would dearly like to see the BNP find out who did this and we would like to see them brought to book. When the real culprit is found we will be expecting a full public apology from Griffin, with damages for the smearing of our names.

In reality, the publication of the membership lists simply shows the contempt in which Griffin holds the BNP membership. By allowing gross inefficiencies in BNP departments (which was the main reason behind the December crisis whereby sickened national officials could not take any more incompetence from two departments and were sacked for speaking out) Griffin is to blame. The fact that up to a dozen (possibly more?) people may have, or have had a full database is bad enough when the database is the BNP’s prize asset. However, the real problem is that Nick Griffin has such a terrible record for falling out with senior BNP officials who criticise him in any way that the list of his enemies is seemingly endless. Because of the way in which Griffin treats those who have given their all for the BNP, he creates a rod for his own back in that some people (in this case misguidedly) may do things which damage the BNP in an attempt to attack Griffin himself.

Further, the rather arrogant way in which the BNP web team and Griffin himself dismiss the membership leak as ‘a publicity bonus’ is truly shocking when you consider that many members and activists with a sensitive job have now been exposed to violent communist bully boys and their backers at Searchlight and UAF. We have already had calls from people who have had such threatening calls and our sympathies go out to them. For Griffin to brush this off, and to wrongly claim that ‘former employees’ were to blame is beneath contempt. Griffin has once again shown just how little he really thinks of the everyday BNP member.

We suggest that the Party Chairman:

1.) Immediately apologises to the six court defendants (who have never been found guilty of anything despite the malicious Griffin/Darby prosecution) and to Kenny Smith in particular.

2.) Actually contacts Dyfed-Powys Police rather than just pretending so, in order to start the ball rolling as to who did actually leak the list.

3.) Actually contacts the web host’s legal department and gets them to shut down the offending websites.

4.) Starts to act in the interests of the members and not operate once more in a zone of self-survival which leads to utter contempt for the feelings of the average BNP member.

Just a little food for thought on how close we nearly came to bowing to the wishes of these people. Let’s make sure we’re not naive enough to let it happen again.

By Joey Smith

We know that trade unions are often mobilised to interfere in our democracy, particularly when the BNP is standing. So it comes as no surprise that a local Unison member in Barking and Dagenham is going to be fighting the BNP there.

You will no doubt have some idea of what the virulently anti-BNP Unison gets up to. Supposedly, allowing hope not hate, searchlies et al, free use of their call-centre facilities. One member allegedly traced nuisance phone calls back to a Unison facility.

Louise Couling is a lollypop woman, or crossing officer (as I imagine she likes to be called), she is also a member of the London branch of Unison and has a position on the National Executive Council (NEC).

According to Labourlist:

Louise describes herself as an ordinary working class trade unionist who fiercely represents her predominantly low-paid women members. She is also a super-proud true Brit who hates fascism.

This is normally translated as lower class, uneducated, very left-wing and thinks Fascism is anything right of themselves; which just happens to be everything when you’re that far left. Having spent some time around the Labour scene, I know what these lot are like. Usually stinking filthy, with yellow teeth, cat hair on their clothes and rather fond of the booze. That’s your average Liebore bag lady. Not to menti0n that most of them were young communists, before they learned to conceal their beliefs.

Richard is running for election to Barking & Dagenham council, instead of parliament, and should be successful, having been one of the most well-known and liked politicians in the area. If the party captures the council Richard is expected to be installed as the first BNP council leader.

This mouldy ragamuffin should offer no stiff challenge to the seasoned BNP activists of B & D, despite the plotting between Liebore and (E)UKIP.

UKIP’s London Chairman Paul Wiffen took great delight in telling me that I was lying about everything in the last article, I must have just made it all up off the top of my head.

They have actually dumped poor Winston Mckenzie and gone for the rabid gay-hater, failed footballer, failed jockey, one-time chef and boxing manager Frank Maloney. Nobody knew about this development, apart from very few of the mugs in (E)UKIP.

Maloney stood in the 2004 London mayoralty election, securing 6.19% of the vote and fourth place. During this very campaign, he refused to canvass Camden because there were ‘too many gays’.

The ponces of the UKIP London hierarchy probably think Maloney’s non-PC outbursts will endear him to the indigenous folks of Barking – the ones that haven’t been ethnically cleansed, yet. We’ll see, maybe Wiffen can make a documentary about it.

We hope he is ready to take on the BNP-Machine, after all, it was only two months ago that he suffered a heart attack. No Mercy, prepare to be crushed, Maloney.

(Gay BNP supporters are urged to participate in the Barking Campaign)

UKIP insiders are claiming that political chameleon Winston Mckenzie is putting himself forward as the candidate to take on Nick Griffin for the Barking parliamentary seat.

The former boxer, landlord and hairdresser who has been a member of Labour, Liberal Democrats, UKIP, Veritas, Conservatives and founder of the now defunct Unity Party is up against Paul Wiffen for the nomination, UKIP’s London Chairman.

UKIP members have asked why the party is standing against another EU withdrawalist in a seat they have little chance of winning. However, it was revealed that UKIP has a history of working with the local Labour party to split the BNP’s vote. Labour activists were even used to deliver UKIP literature, and the party put up 12 candidates specifically in the Barking and Dagenham wards contested by the BNP in 2006.

The plot thickens, de-facto leader of UKIP’s Barking and Dagenham branch is Kenny Smith, whose brother just happens to to be Liam Smith, the boss of the local Labour group and River Ward councillor.

Given the nature of UKIP’s duplicity it would not be surprising if the BNP stood a candidate against Nigel Farage, who plans to oust the speaker of the house of commons John Bercow in Buckingham. This would seriously lengthen the odds of the contest returning UKIP’s first MP.

Mckenzie is a prize fool, but he is also Black. UKIP will trade on his ethnicity, playing up the contest as some sort of battle between the lovely ethnic minority vs the evil BNP leader whom wants to send him home to Jamaica. The press will love it.

Credit where it is due, Mckenzie was one of the very few London Mayoralty candidates that didn’t walk off the stage when Richard Barnbrook made his victory speech.

As you all probably know, It has been announced that Nick Griffin will be representing the European parliament at the Copenhagen summit on climate change.

As per usual, the leftists  - whom love to subscribe to the evil human destroying the planet mantra – are up in arms, he’s a ‘DENIER’, they scream. In a pitiful attempt to equate the Anthropogenic global warming (AGW) sceptics with holocaust deniers.

BNP supporters have welcomed this development, it’s thought that Nick will get a chance to blast this nonsense in public. He is quickly becoming the non-believer’s champion, and therein lies the reason why he has been given this appointment.

The bigots of the anti-human AGW groups have influenced, probably demanded, that the European Parliament select Nick Griffin as the official representative because he is the only AGW-sceptic on the European Environmental Committee. They hope that his reputation will damage the cause of the sceptics. Tactically, a nasty little move, but one not totally unexpected from the vicious pro-climate tax lobby.

This is still a coup for the BNP, many comments have been made in support of the BNP’s stance on climate change (so many that the Daily Mail moderator has deleted them all, again), and it gives a good airing of our views aside from race and immigration, for once.

Peak oil, natural gas and coal will occur within the next few decades, removing the ‘problem’ of the carbon emissions produced from burning fossil fuels. Unless the climate-nuts are peak-fuel deniers?

I’m half tempted to ring Ladbrokes for odds on the USA launching a ‘war on CO2′, and invading some crap little country because it’s still using diesel Skodas. Mugs.

There is confusion spread throughout the party. Some are asking why we have to amend our constitution, some are questioning their ideology and some are taking a long hard look at their political allegiance. They are right to be unsure.  We are walking a tightrope. If we falter now, the BNP will never secure parliamentary representation for the indigenous peoples of these isles.

A cocksure Tory once said that Labour would never be elected again. A few years previously James Callaghan’s Old Labour  government had fallen. It was widely believed that the party then in its present incarnation would never capture the support of middle England again. The signs were there in 1974 (and arguably decades earlier), when they had been forced to form a minority government, short of a majority by 33 seats. The belief that the public had lost faith – and many were suspicious of anything remotely resembling communism – in a socialist party was borne out over the course of the next three general elections, they failed in 83, 87, and 92.

Labour bigwigs needed to make the party more attractive to the middle-class, it was vital that they try to move away from its socialist stance to free-market policies. There was considerable opposition from the elder members and the hardcore ‘reds’. Like the BNP, Labour had constitutional issues, the infamous clause four, which detailed Labour’s commitment to Nationalisation and wealth redistribution, but it was also a stick for their own back, often attacked by their opponents.

In 1992, Labour were expected to defeat the Tories. Labour lost, and this was a wake up call for the party, it gave impetus to the architects of the New Labour project. Labour ratified Blair’s clause four constitutional amendments in 1995. This represented the final step from Old Labour to New Labour, and two years later, they won, massively.

2004 was our wake up call, it was supposed to be the year that the BNP finally broke into the big time, we were going to win several seats at the European election. Perhaps we should have realised that the media weren’t attacking us because we we didn’t pose a threat, and they were right, we were agonisingly close in Nick’s North-West region, but ultimately we failed. The party had overextended itself financially, morale was very low, and then, Nick announced the unthinkable, we were going to have to amend our membership criteria. There was big opposition from the membership, and the plan was abandoned, but not forgotten.

Five years later, high on victory, the amendments first suggested in 2004 were now being forced onto us by the establishment. The first hurdle has been navigated – the voting membership has selected a proposal from the Chairman to go to the party membership to ratify our constitutional amendments. The membership now holds in their hands the one chance we have to break away from the remnants of the old party that hold us back. For some, this may be a very bitter pill to swallow, but tell me: Is it as bitter as all the years of failure you have endured?

Remember;

We are still Ethno-Nationalists,

We still oppose mass immigration,

We are still committed to dismantling Multiculturalism,

We will leave the European Union.

The major difference between ethno-nationalism and racial-nationalism, is that the former recognises loyalty to your ethnic group before that of your race. Think of your country, culture and heritage before that of the kindred ethnicities. This may come as a surprise, but the British have been betrayed, bullied and in some cases slaughtered by those whom racial-nationalists would consider their brethren. It’s just a reconsideration, a repositioning of your world view and priorities.

From 1982 to 1999, the BNP was like a small child, uncouth, politically unpalatable, electorally toxic, too influenced by the movements that gave birth to it. We are now at the adolescence stage of our development, and it is painful. We are at the brink of passing into adulthood, political maturity, and like a youngster that has outgrown his peers, we most move on. Move on to electoral success and become a parliamentary party.

However, we must not cast aside those whom were there in the beginning, but they must accept that the tyranny we face now was allowed to manifest itself on their watch, their brand of nationalism was unacceptable to the electorate, it was a complete failure, they must accept and correct those failings, and they must adapt. Those that have done so, now lead the party.

This is our ‘clause four moment’.

This polling research below was backed by, and produced for, political betting. As I have said before, within reason, those who have money to put where their mouths are have less of an axe to grind and are closer to what is really happening.

Nationally the BNP are on 5% but this includes weak areas. But for the North the BNP has grown to 8%! Maybe this should be an area in which the BNP concentrate.

At present all sorts of rumours are abound, and the main focus of the BNP is towards Barking, and with good reason because as stated HERE You will see the move upwards in support for the BNP and steep decline for Labour making winning the seat a real possibility.

But what of other seats? We have our two MEP’s from the North West and Yorkshire and Humberside regions. I don’t think it is beyond the realms of possibility that we have Nick Griffin elected for Barking and at least another candidate elected from another seat, we do need to not just focus on Barking though but look at the whole of the UK. The euro elections are good for one purpose they give every voter in the UK a chance to vote BNP. At this election I think we should give as many voters as possible a chance to vote BNP, by having as many candidates as possible. Lets see what happens.

By Election Correspondent