The British Nationalist

Well, despite what the mass media are reporting, the British National Party are open for business and taking new membership applications.

The Judge has demanded two pieces of the new constitution changed within 30 days from today. Nick immediately edited one of the sections of the constitution which he had the power to do, however, the other section is write protected. It cannot be amended except by the membership.

This means that the party will probably call an Emergency General Meeting (EGM) within the next 30 days, in order to amend the constitution once again, and satisfy London County Court.

If the party can convert all potential members on the waiting list into full members, we’re looking at a capital investment somewhere in the region of £210,000. Of course, £60,000 of this money is earmarked for the coffers of the odious EHRC.

Other News

Other BNP bloggers don’t like talking about ‘bad news’ and would probably ask me to shut up about this, but I believe the news below should wake up some of our folks. The NF is now actively encouraging our members and supporters to defect, that makes them a political enemy. There’s no point pretending that it isn’t happening.

Rotherham borough  BNP Councillor John Gamble has defected to the National Front (NF). He is probably the NF’s first elected official in 30 years, if not longer. Gamble is up for re-election in 2012, when, I hope, the BNP will claim this seat back from the turncoat.

I’m sure many of you will have watched Young, Angry and White on Channel 4 last Friday, if not, here’s the link – It is highly recommended.

Despite the blurb describing the documentary, the short film isn’t really about the BNP. The star of the show, 19-yr-old Kieren, says that he is considering joining the BNP.

At first, you imagine the usual caricature. Some young, chavvy bloke who left school at 14. Not in this case! I was quite impressed with Kieren, he understands his ideology and was able to put it forward in a manner that many older nationalists couldn’t.

However, when the camera crew attended his BBQ, you will have noticed the flags draped over his garden fence. I knew then that this lad was going to have issues with the BNP’s direction – he is a racial-nationalist, the BNP are not.  His water and ink analogy made me cringe, I’m not saying he was incorrect, biologically speaking he is correct, it was just a very crude way of explaining the concept to a group of young, mugsheeple.

You quickly get the impression that Kieren has been influenced by some of the more eccentric nationalists. I know he has been because I’ve read his posts on the Stormfront forum, not exactly the best place to learn about political nationalism.

Near the end of the footage Kieren discovers that we’re making amendments to our constitution. He doesn’t like it, and so he joins the National Front. Which makes a mockery of the documentary as I believe there was never any question of him joining the BNP. He is a racial-nationalist and – as a young lad – he is attracted to the grittier factions of nationalism. (Before anybody says that the BNP is a racial nationalist party, it isn’t. The new constitution states that we are ethno-nationalist)

I feel that Kieren is too good for the NF, he will probably rise rapidly within the organisation, as he actually has a brain. Then again, hopefully, he will see the dead-end that is political racial-nationalism and ‘modify’ (I prefer upgrade) his ideology.

The documentary appears to be ‘bigging up’ the NF, which of course makes sense to the enemies of nationalism. Austria has two successful nationalist parties, combined they could  probably win control of the country, whilst apart, they are competing against each other and their potential is diluted.

I don’t believe that it had very much to do with the BNP but it is still worth watching. Channel 4 have been a little bit sly, they purposely didn’t pick the stereotypical young, white male that I described earlier. If they did, it is easier to laugh at that caricature and pretend we’re all just thick, little bigots on the fringes of society. Channel 4 has chosen a normal lad, albeit an ideologue – for one reason; It scares people.

It’s still quite a shame to lose a recruit of Kieren’s quality.

Over the past few weeks there has been a sharp increase in the amount of anti-BNP agitators. They’ve tried to embed themselves into the social network, the chat rooms and the blogs – even creating a few new blogs.

With this in mind, it was decided to resurrect the old site, but not running at the same level as the previous ‘magazine’ site. Hence the more minimal styling. Some of you will be happy to hear that I managed to salvage all the author’s posts and comments, others less so.

In the coming weeks the British National Party membership will be making the biggest decision ever asked of them. Our enemies know this, they hope that by some interference they can drive a wedge into the membership, causing splits or factions.

The newest little addition to the anti-BNP blog army is claiming that it represents 70+ ex-BNP members. However, the description gives the game away:

“A GROWING GROUP OF EX PARTY MEMBERS TO EXPOSE THE HIDDEN AGENDA OF THIS VICIOUS PARTY TO MEMBERS OF THE VOTING PUBLIC AND TO CURRENT UNSUSPECTING MEMBERS WHO ARE BEING BRAINWASHED.

ANY EX MEMBERS WHO HAVE TRUE EVENTS AND STORIES TO TELL THEN PLEASE GET IN TOUCH.”

Now, the majority of ex-members have left because they believe the party has moved away from its original ideology. Some believe the party isn’t ‘vicious’ enough, they certainly don’t think it has grown too aggressive for them since Nick Griffin took over in 1999. So, who else thinks the party is ‘vicious’, couldn’t be our anti-fascist pals, could it?

Secondly, the blog author is claiming that they have raised £4,000 to stand independent candidates against BNP parliamentary candidates. The reasoning behind the move raises further questions about those running the blog, and their real agenda:

“The only reason we will do this is to strategically split the votes and Help to lose the BNP their deposits , We have no political agenda other than to Protect the General public from these Crooks whom are just wanting to bleed the country dry.”

Right, because if you wanted to raid the country’s bare coffers you would pick a small, fringe nationalist party as a vehicle to do it, wouldn’t you? Nonsense. And nonsense is what constitutes the vast majority of the postings on the site. The facts can be found if only you search.

The final piece of evidence offered up should leave you in no doubt as to the nature of the people behind it. Every post labels a senior activist or official as a ‘racist’, including Martin Wingfield, Michael Elliot, Clive Jefferson, and Eddy Butler.

There is a twist – the site claims to be run by our pals from the now defunct BNP reform group. The site author considers the National Front as a ‘viable alternative’ to the BNP, yet perceives no irony in labelling BNP folk as racist, whilst attempting to reconstruct a racial-nationalist party. Perhaps this development lends weight to those who claimed that the reformists weren’t interested in politics, merely interested in bringing the BNP down. If this isn’t the case, you have to ask why they haven’t simply taken their skills to the National Front and let us get on with our political activities.

You can view the pitiful blog here. Let them know what you think of their lies and schemes.

—————————————————————————–

Here follows an intercepted email from Mike Easter, member of the British National Party (BNP) reform group. You may recall that the odious activities of the reform group were covered in an earlier article here. Chris Jackson – the leader of the group and would-be fuhrer of the BNP – has since claimed that he is going to join the National Front (NF).

Hi,

Since writing the attached, the BNP accounts are still not in to the Electoral Commission.  Also Griffin has been consorting with Fiore and other foreigners of very dubious reputation.  He is now making certain that the BNP General Election campaign in Barking, where Richard Barnbrook was to stand, will be a fiasco.  NG has deserted the North West almost as soon as he was elected.

Some people have actually already transfered to the NF including Steve Smith of Burnley fame.

Others are waiting to hear the result of a NF directorate meeting on 5th December at which, we hope, Ian Edward will be confirmed as NF Chairman.

Ian, I am sure he won’t mind me saying, is a steady lad and intends to keep to the NF Constitution.

This Constitution is just the one that the BNP should have, but hasn’t.

Regards,

Mike Easter

Attachment

The situation is currently very confused for nationalists. (Perhaps less confusing now that Griffin has come out of the closet!)  There is no apparent best option.   All options have serious downsides.  Let’s consider the following:

1.  Continue in the BNP and attempt to reform it.

2.  Rejoin the NF, effectively transferring the trained personnel from the BNP into the NF.

3.  Go with Dem Nats.

4.  Do nothing.

The BNP is by far the largest of the nationalist groups. However, it suffers from having a dictatorial structure consequent on its ludicrous Constitution. It has a very high turnover of members and most members are unschooled in nationalist politics. Indeed it is now becoming difficult to describe it as a racial nationalist party.

The NF is tiny but has, over the last year or two, grown appreciably. It does have a proper Constitution and that potentially means that it can grow and develop in a satisfactory way. (The de facto leader is now Ian Edward.)

The Democratic Nationalists is effectively a ‘shell’ and has very limited membership but is registered with the Electoral Commission. It has a Constitution that would allow for growth and development.

Before making a personal decision, I would like to get a feeling for others opinions. My feeling is that the BNP is going nowhere. Consequently, making an enormous effort to reform the BNP, remove dud personnel and then train the members in nationalism will be time and energy wasted.

The NF is very small but contains well motivated nationalists and has a Constitution that allows for the party to grow and is controlled by the members.

The Democratic Nationalists seem to be in a similar situation to the NF but only just starting out.

I have deliberately not mentioned individuals in this brief note. However, in the cases of the NF, and also the DNs, it would be possible at the respective annual general meetings to remove individuals from positions of authority, who are in some way unsatisfactory. This has not been possible in the case of the BNP due to its Constitution.

Personally, I am inclined to put my effort into the NF because, first of all they are genuine racial nationalists, and secondly they potentially can grow rapidly if the long term BNP members, including those that have been thrown out by Griffin, join them. These are people already trained.

‘Dem Nats’ refers to the independent nationalist candidates that the reform group intends to stand against BNP candidates in the general election, under the Democratic Nationalist label. Some Dem Nat candidates have already been selected to stand in Bradford and Burnley.

Point 1 is the option that the reform group is currently employing, subversive tactics laid out in the infamous six point plan. We’re hearing of some bizarre little games being played out at recent BNP meetings in the North; showing of hands, people storming out of rooms.  A bemused member whom attended one of the meetings and witnessed Jackson’s latest stunt, said:

‘He (Jackson) launched into a tirade about Nick Griffin, and at the end asked us if we still supported the leader or him, only about 12 out of 60 people put their hand up for him. He said that when he got to power he’d hang all those whom voted for the amendments. We’re calling him Wacko Jacko, he’s losing the plot.’

The NF appears to be ecstatic at the moment. It seems that members of the National Front’s directorate –  a member of which is the hilariously inept Eddy Morrison – are under pressure to select the ‘right’ chairman, before any of the reform group will join them, they’re holding the NF to ransom, not the best way to enter into a new alliance. A source tells us that whomever is selected will be considered as somebody who is easily cast aside when Chris Jackson decides he wants to become the Chairman.

The NF are claiming that they’re going to see a big increase in membership, mainly driven by dissatisfaction amongst the nutzis about the upcoming BNP member ballot on the constitutional amendments. The vote is expected to favour the proposals offered by Nick Griffin. The party has confirmed that despite the amendments our ethno-nationalist ideology, and our policies, will remain intact. What’s the problem?

Well, BNP members and supporters should not be fooled. These people are not threatening to leave because of the constitutional amendments forced on us by the establishment, they are people with a pathological hatred of the current leadership, and especially Nick Griffin. They have been sitting in a run-down pub, belittling the success of the party and praying for Nick to trip up, in some cases they have been waiting for that day for 30 years. They can wait on, preferably from the politically insignificant sidelines of the National Front.

National Front official, and one time member of the British Movement, the BNP, the NF, the New NF, the NAP and the NDFM, Eddy Morrison, has called upon the National Front to recruit the various Nutzi groups, and form them into a fighting force.

In a blog post called ‘Time for Ruthlessness‘, Eddy produces a four point plan:

• Firstly, the red street opposition – within the law they must be met with the same sort of counter-force that they apply to we ‘fascists’. If they walk round screeching ‘Smash the NF by any means possible’ then they should not be surprised if we vigorously and legally defend ourselves and they come away with a few bloody noses.
• Secondly we must be ruthless with the other small groups on the scene – some of them who could form the basis of National Stewarding Corps of the NF. These smaller groups should in my opinion thrown in their lot with the now most mainstream WNMovement – the NF. We just haven’t got the time for small groups anymore – all WN’s must pull together in one party. Exactly that which the NF was set up for in the first place.
• Thirdly, we must be ruthless with those proper British Nationalists still in the BNP.
• Lastly we must be ruthles with ourselves – only TOTAL fanatical commitment to the Cause of White Nationalism can now win the day . The time for compromise is past. the time for ruthlessness has arrived…..

Proper British Nationalists? I assume he means Racial-Nationalists, since when did they have the monopoly on British Nationalism? The NF is in a frenzy at the moment, expecting a great influx of disgruntled BNP members, I think, they may be surprised. The only people kicking up a fuss over the constitutional amendments are the ex-members, those whom were purged over the last decade. The NF may regret ever recruiting them.

Not all racial-nationalists are Nutzis, and contrary to what Maximilian  - definitely Nutzi – says on Stormfront, I do not believe that all the users of that forum are Nutzis. It’s a very simple change of mindset from thinking as a racial-nationalist to thinking as an ethno-nationalist. The Nutzis are the ones whom cannot accept this, they’re too defeatist, they want to go down in a blaze of glory, and preferably, in a race-war.

Assorted nutzi cranks – residing outside of the British National Party – have reacted with frothing-at-the-mouth fury about the proposed opening of the BNP’s membership to ethnic minorities.

They’re even complaining about being called ‘Nutzis’, ‘What is it? Sounds like a chocolate bar’, one infamous nutzi said. It means a follower of racial nationalism who is also suffering from mental illness. Another Nutzi who claims that she isn’t a Nazi, would do well to recall the time, on national news, when she said: ‘We’re not Nazis, we’re Nationalist and Socialist’. Lol, National-Socialism anyone?

Nutzi habitats include; Stormfront, NorthWest Nationalists, Griffinwatch and VNN. Avoid, if they find out you support Nick Griffini, you will be labelled a ‘Griffinite’ and attacked relentlessly.

It appears that nutzi, stormfront moderator and Tyndallite: ‘Old Knight’, called for the expulsion of any BNP supporters that still use the forum and support the amendments. When this request was rejected by Stormfront owner Don Black, the elderly nutzi had a tantrum and resigned his moderator duties (for the 4th time).

The spiritual leader of the cult of Nutzism is uncle Adolf, hardly surprising is it?

The resolution was passed by the voting membership to seek the ratification of the amendments by a party wide ballot. This is now the critical point for the opponents of the political evolution of the BNP; namely, the reform group, whom will try to stir up enough support amongst the rank and file members to scupper the amendments. The amendments need two thirds of the total vote to pass.

There are those whom are pretending to support the amendments, but are secretly (so they think) following the plan laid out by the reform group: appear to support the leadership, but work from within to sow the seeds of malcontent. Watch this space.

Some of these old school representatives of the failed nationalism have recognised that the party has moved on. The bulk of the membership is moderate. When the party had a base of 2,000 members, it was to be expected that the majority of them were hardliners. The membership today exceeds 13,000, with most of the members having defected from other mainstream parties, this all contributes to the mainstreaming of the BNP. Some couldn’t stomach it and were left behind. They’re not the problem, it’s  those who hung on – when they should have defected to the National Front – that are going to be a problem. A small problem given that they number less than a few hundred.

In the words of a fellow amendist: ‘Why can’t they just F*** O**?!’

Anyhow, the moderate majority should have the numerical superiority to approve these party saving amendments. But which way will you vote?

NF Demonstration Against Gays

The legal action brought by government quango the Commission for Equality and Human Rights (CEHR) against the British National Party (BNP) has implications for other parties which have a constitution and membership rules restricted to the indigenous British and kindred folk, namely, the National Front (NF).

An NF spokesman identified as ‘The Patriot’ produced an article which details discussions between members of their hierarchy about whether they should support the BNP, or not. The Patriot said: “My response can be summed up in a few words: whatever support can be practicably offered to and, in a comradely spirit, be accepted by the BNP and, for our future survival…. Europe.“

The writer states that the offer above is not official NF policy, but we can assume that the writer was authorised to make the offer, as it appears on their national website.

The article goes on to say: “The NF should both turn up in large numbers to support Nick Griffin and the BNP as a matter of principle and, also, grasp the guaranteed Press and Media opportunity offered by the trial to remind the masses that we are still out here, forever alert and calling on them them to rally, find courage and join the NF as the only viable UK White Nationalist alternative to the BNP.”

In other words, this is a potential goldmine of publicity for the National Front, and if  the court rules against the BNP, they hope to collect the former BNP members who will not stay with the party if we’re forced to accept ethnic minorities.  You begin to see who benefits more from this little arrangement?

“Even if the BNP legally caves in that day, the NF, as the remaining sizable representative of the State-abandoned White masses, should exploit the publicity offered by that hearing and any subsequent hearings.”

My fear is that the NF members will mingle with the BNP members, giving the press photographers ideal propaganda pictures of shaven-headed men in bomber jackets holding placards with the ‘14-words’ emblazoned across the front, and hand drawn banners depicting homosexuals burning in hell.

Some NF supporters believe that the BNP owes the NF, because of the history of British Nationalism. They believe that the NF is a party for the purists, and therefore, they have the moral high ground, the BNP are just sellouts or hardline Tories. The fact is, we are successful because we have abandoned the historically failed methods of the NF. In short, we don’t need the NF.

There has been an alternative suggested; the NF should demonstrate outside the offices of the CEHR on the day of the trial, and not with the BNP members outside the courthouse on the 2nd of September. This may not appeal to the hierarchy of the NF, who seem determined to ride the publicity machine that is the BNP.