The British Nationalist

Over the past few weeks there has been a sharp increase in the amount of anti-BNP agitators. They’ve tried to embed themselves into the social network, the chat rooms and the blogs – even creating a few new blogs.

With this in mind, it was decided to resurrect the old site, but not running at the same level as the previous ‘magazine’ site. Hence the more minimal styling. Some of you will be happy to hear that I managed to salvage all the author’s posts and comments, others less so.

In the coming weeks the British National Party membership will be making the biggest decision ever asked of them. Our enemies know this, they hope that by some interference they can drive a wedge into the membership, causing splits or factions.

The newest little addition to the anti-BNP blog army is claiming that it represents 70+ ex-BNP members. However, the description gives the game away:

“A GROWING GROUP OF EX PARTY MEMBERS TO EXPOSE THE HIDDEN AGENDA OF THIS VICIOUS PARTY TO MEMBERS OF THE VOTING PUBLIC AND TO CURRENT UNSUSPECTING MEMBERS WHO ARE BEING BRAINWASHED.

ANY EX MEMBERS WHO HAVE TRUE EVENTS AND STORIES TO TELL THEN PLEASE GET IN TOUCH.”

Now, the majority of ex-members have left because they believe the party has moved away from its original ideology. Some believe the party isn’t ‘vicious’ enough, they certainly don’t think it has grown too aggressive for them since Nick Griffin took over in 1999. So, who else thinks the party is ‘vicious’, couldn’t be our anti-fascist pals, could it?

Secondly, the blog author is claiming that they have raised £4,000 to stand independent candidates against BNP parliamentary candidates. The reasoning behind the move raises further questions about those running the blog, and their real agenda:

“The only reason we will do this is to strategically split the votes and Help to lose the BNP their deposits , We have no political agenda other than to Protect the General public from these Crooks whom are just wanting to bleed the country dry.”

Right, because if you wanted to raid the country’s bare coffers you would pick a small, fringe nationalist party as a vehicle to do it, wouldn’t you? Nonsense. And nonsense is what constitutes the vast majority of the postings on the site. The facts can be found if only you search.

The final piece of evidence offered up should leave you in no doubt as to the nature of the people behind it. Every post labels a senior activist or official as a ‘racist’, including Martin Wingfield, Michael Elliot, Clive Jefferson, and Eddy Butler.

There is a twist – the site claims to be run by our pals from the now defunct BNP reform group. The site author considers the National Front as a ‘viable alternative’ to the BNP, yet perceives no irony in labelling BNP folk as racist, whilst attempting to reconstruct a racial-nationalist party. Perhaps this development lends weight to those who claimed that the reformists weren’t interested in politics, merely interested in bringing the BNP down. If this isn’t the case, you have to ask why they haven’t simply taken their skills to the National Front and let us get on with our political activities.

You can view the pitiful blog here. Let them know what you think of their lies and schemes.

—————————————————————————–

It seems The Times journalists have been trawling the Stormfront forum – with no official BNP forum – they are reduced to delving into that garbage purveyor to gauge BNP members and supporters reactions to Question Time. The Times refers to a poll which asks ‘Should Griffin step down as BNP Chairman?‘, with 32 saying yes against 79 saying no.

“Yesterday supporters expressed their anger on Stormfront, a nationalist forum with the logo “White Pride Worldwide”. In a poll of more than 100 members, 30 per cent said that Mr Griffin should be replaced. Scores more have used the website to criticise his appearance on the programme, labelling it “disastrous”.

One, writing as “Smith”, said: “The facts are thus: we aren’t winning, QT didn’t help, it just made us look stupid and the intelligent amongst us want Griffin replaced.”

Another, Doriot, said: “To me is seems pretty obvious that the party has gone as far as it can under his leadership.”

It is far from being a good indicator of opinion, but as we know, journalists will attempt to infer from the most tenuous of sources.

1.) Stormfront is an unofficially proscribed forum, no decent BNP member uses it.

2.) It is known to be infested with communist troublemakers. Any polls are influenced by these elements.

3.) Several Stormfront users are disgruntled ex-BNP members, hardcore Nazis and good candidates for mental health confinement, hardly the best group of people to poll.

4.) Virulent anti-Griffin people moderate the forum, in particular, the elderly Tyndall lover ‘Old Knight’.

The Times offers up Andrew Brons MEP, Martin Wingfield and Simon Darby as alternatives. It’s nothing more than an ill-judged attempt to create the internal division that the Times claims already exists. If somebody wants to replace Nick Griffin they can come forward and explain how they would have handled Question Time differently, yes Nick has baggage, and he has acknowledged that this will represent a glass ceiling limiting how far he can take us, but would you sacrifice Nick’s qualities for a ‘clean’ leader with no ability?