The British Nationalist

We know that trade unions are often mobilised to interfere in our democracy, particularly when the BNP is standing. So it comes as no surprise that a local Unison member in Barking and Dagenham is going to be fighting the BNP there.

You will no doubt have some idea of what the virulently anti-BNP Unison gets up to. Supposedly, allowing hope not hate, searchlies et al, free use of their call-centre facilities. One member allegedly traced nuisance phone calls back to a Unison facility.

Louise Couling is a lollypop woman, or crossing officer (as I imagine she likes to be called), she is also a member of the London branch of Unison and has a position on the National Executive Council (NEC).

According to Labourlist:

Louise describes herself as an ordinary working class trade unionist who fiercely represents her predominantly low-paid women members. She is also a super-proud true Brit who hates fascism.

This is normally translated as lower class, uneducated, very left-wing and thinks Fascism is anything right of themselves; which just happens to be everything when you’re that far left. Having spent some time around the Labour scene, I know what these lot are like. Usually stinking filthy, with yellow teeth, cat hair on their clothes and rather fond of the booze. That’s your average Liebore bag lady. Not to menti0n that most of them were young communists, before they learned to conceal their beliefs.

Richard is running for election to Barking & Dagenham council, instead of parliament, and should be successful, having been one of the most well-known and liked politicians in the area. If the party captures the council Richard is expected to be installed as the first BNP council leader.

This mouldy ragamuffin should offer no stiff challenge to the seasoned BNP activists of B & D, despite the plotting between Liebore and (E)UKIP.

UKIP insiders are claiming that political chameleon Winston Mckenzie is putting himself forward as the candidate to take on Nick Griffin for the Barking parliamentary seat.

The former boxer, landlord and hairdresser who has been a member of Labour, Liberal Democrats, UKIP, Veritas, Conservatives and founder of the now defunct Unity Party is up against Paul Wiffen for the nomination, UKIP’s London Chairman.

UKIP members have asked why the party is standing against another EU withdrawalist in a seat they have little chance of winning. However, it was revealed that UKIP has a history of working with the local Labour party to split the BNP’s vote. Labour activists were even used to deliver UKIP literature, and the party put up 12 candidates specifically in the Barking and Dagenham wards contested by the BNP in 2006.

The plot thickens, de-facto leader of UKIP’s Barking and Dagenham branch is Kenny Smith, whose brother just happens to to be Liam Smith, the boss of the local Labour group and River Ward councillor.

Given the nature of UKIP’s duplicity it would not be surprising if the BNP stood a candidate against Nigel Farage, who plans to oust the speaker of the house of commons John Bercow in Buckingham. This would seriously lengthen the odds of the contest returning UKIP’s first MP.

Mckenzie is a prize fool, but he is also Black. UKIP will trade on his ethnicity, playing up the contest as some sort of battle between the lovely ethnic minority vs the evil BNP leader whom wants to send him home to Jamaica. The press will love it.

Credit where it is due, Mckenzie was one of the very few London Mayoralty candidates that didn’t walk off the stage when Richard Barnbrook made his victory speech.

The whole by-election was a bit of a farce. The Labour candidate proudly mooted as the only local candidate cast his vote by postal ballot and is actually registered to vote in London, his father being the Willie Bains registered in Glasgow. There is a police investigation ongoing into several cases of “personation” and the massive increase in postal votes assigned to Labour just a day or two before the election is also a matter for concern, as raised by the Spectator. In this regard one should remember the trouble in Glenrothes with regard to the registration books which is still unresolved.

Apparently, the BNP was refused a recount with regard to the 20 votes by which they failed to retain their deposit. If so, I would like to know on what grounds. The returning officer stated that he would allow a recount of the 1st and 2nd placed party’s ballots, but not the 3rd and 4th placed parties. The Conservative’s and the BNP’s respectively.

Despite all the above question marks and again despite media onslaughts, biased reporting, comics like the Lizzard and religious ministers like Christopher Rowe forbidding his parishioners from voting for the BNP, this was an excellent result, which obviously had the frighteners on all the other parties that took part. 74 years of Labour rule has left its mark not only on the sad demise of Glasgow North East as a provider of statistics but on the sorry mental state of the voters who can’t see the wood for the Labour moss.

“Postal voting on demand is lethal to the democratic process. Wholesale electoral fraud is both easy and profitable.”

That statement sounds like a description of Afghan electoral practices, but it was delivered by Richard Mawrey QC after an inquest into UK postal voting … History shows that Labour benefit from postal voting, notably at the comfortable Glenrothes by-election victory last year, when every indication was that the SNP would overturn the majority.

The Scotsman claims that over 6,000 people have registered for postal votes in Glasgow North East, which is 10 percent of eligible voters. (Surely not that many people can be bed ridden or in absentia, even in Glasgow North East?) … Postal voting is open to fraud and has been abused on numerous occasions by a range of campaigns. The system is shambolic and needs to be reformed to ensure that only those who are incapacitated or unable to vote on the day receive a postal ballot.” (Electoral fraud – The Spectator Blog - http://tinyurl.com/yhy2o9m )

Police investigate ballot papers at Glasgow North East by-election - http://tinyurl.com/yf6mgzu

“But the SNP has formally asked for the Electoral Commission to investigate whether Labour abused the postal vote system after 1,100 postal votes were applied for less than three days before the deadline. The applications came in so late that the SNP was unable to visit all the voters involved, before their postal votes were sent in. The SNP alleges this prevented it from getting fair access to all the voters involved.” (SNP throws in towel to Labour in Glasgow North East byelection - http://tinyurl.com/yg2a4qh )

By Sheriff of Nottingham

Notice how the other muppets do a runner as soon as the BNP candidate stands to address the hall. What a total lack of respect, this is not just aimed at the BNP but the whole political system.

In effect, Labour had this in the bag, mail bag that is. Postal voting claims rose from 2,000 at the last election to over 7,000 for this by election. It is being widely reported that in the new labour election handbook, not only will every sitting MP get £10,000 of tax payers money to advertise to the electorate but they are being willed to make sure every labour voter has a postal ballot form. Third world politics for a fast becoming third world country.

By Election Correspondent

You will see below two sets of results, one from this year, where the BNP got 4.4% and one from 4 years ago where the BNP got 3.2%, This is no ordinary election, the world and his wife will have eyes on the result. Plus, unlike the past you have a real contest between Labour and the SNP. In these instances when a real contest happens between two parties the others get squeezed.

I would say that to get around the 500 mark will be good for the BNP as it means we have kept the support loyal, anything more than that would mean it has grown in this area, and to increase on 4.4% would be fantastic because despite the close competition the voters have chosen to go with the BNP. Voting is this Thursday 12th November between 7am-10pm

VOTES FROM 2009 EURO ELECTIONS
British National Party – Local People First 545
Scottish Christian Party “Proclaiming Christ’s Lordship” 179
Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party 561
Jury Team Democracy, Accountability, Transparency 47
Liberal Democrats 533
No2EU:Yes To Democracy 179
Scottish Green Party 822
Scottish National Party (SNP) 3177
Scottish Socialist Party 287
Socialist Labour Party 446
The Labour Party 5244
United Kingdom Independance Party 618
Independent 67

In percentages that is
Lab 42.8%
SNP 25.9%
Grn 6.7%
UKIP 5.0%
Con 4.6%
BNP 4.4%
LD 4.3%
Oth 6.2%

RESULT FROM 2005 GENERAL ELECTION
Speaker Michael Martin 15,153 53.3 -13.8
Scottish National Party John McLaughlin 5,019 17.7 -0.5
Socialist Labour Doris Kelly 4,036 14.2 N/A
Scottish Socialist Graham Campbell 1,402 4.9 -3.2
Scottish Unionist Daniel Houston 1,266 4.5 +0.3
British National Scott McLean 920 3.2 N/A
Independent Joe Chambers 622 2.2 N/A

Majority 10,134 35.7

Turnout 28,418 45.8% +1.9%

Speaker hold Swing -6.6%

Good luck to BNP candidate Charlie Baillie.

By Election Correspondent

Next year, a General Election has to be called, the big question is: who will be leading the Labour Party into battle?

After a recent rare joint public appearance by the Miliband brothers, rumours began to fly amongst some Labour MPs that either of them could take over the party leadership as early as the end of this year, given the recent polls are showing that Labour would be unlikely to win a general election with Mr Brown as Leader.

However, there is a slight sticking point, that being the media and the voting public would be less than happy of accepting a another coronation without a general election being held. Mr Brown’s unelected takeover of Number 10 stuck and still sticks in the gullet of many. Therefore, any new leader would have to go to the Country almost immediately, and opening up the possibility of handing victory to the Conservatives, also now that the Treaty of Lisbon has been ratified by all member states without the promised referendum to the people of the UK, Labour are not the most popular choice for many voters although the Conservatives have also stated that they’are back tracking on holding a referendum if they win the general election .

If Labour were to hold off the changeover until the New Year with the new leader in place by the end of January, then they could quite possibly get away with holding out for a May election, as most people have been expecting the election to be held around that period. However, if they went for a new leader before the end of this year then the election could be as early as February or March.

The other question is: which Miliband? It’s thought in some circles that perhaps the younger Miliband is more personable and is a stronger campaigner than his older brother, who has been linked with rumours in Paris and Brussels as a possible contender for the post of the EU’s “high representative”, who if he was successful would have to step down as Labour MP for South Shields thereby triggering a by-election, which has sent ripples through Westminster as if the Constitutional Reform Bill - allowing life peers to resign from the House of Lords - is passed by Christmas, it could open the way for Lord Mandelson to resign from being a Life Peer and possibly become a challenger himself for the position of Leader of the Labour party.

Alley Cat

Since announcing that the leader of the British National Party (BNP) Nick Griffin will appear on Question Time – their flagship politics show – the publicly funded BBC has come under sustained attack – from all those whom would normally reserve their venom for the BNP;

1.) Labour fuhrer Gordon Brown is said to have been ‘furious’, as calls went back and forth from No.10 to the Director-General’s office. The BBC’s Royal Charter is its constitution, it guarantees the independence of the corporation, section 6.1 states: ‘The BBC shall be independent in all matters concerning the content of its output, the times and manner in which this is supplied, and in the management of its affairs.’ Yet Labour’s Alan Johnson appeared on the latest episode of Question time and proceeded to repeat over and over again that the BNP is illegal because of the constitution, he did this because he knows that section 6.1 is proceeded by a large ‘BUT’ in section 6.2, the independence of the BBC is subject to any provision ‘made by law’. Luckily for us the court hasn’t yet ruled that we’re breaking the law, if we fought and lost this case before the next general election the BBC would be under no obligation to air our broadcasts on any of its services.

The BBC’s charter is next due for reformation on the 31st of December 2016, we shouldn’t be surprised if the government tries to amend the constitution to limit party political broadcasts to parties that have representation in parliament.

2.) Journalists from The Guardian – no surprise there, The Independent and Telegraph queued up to ‘blast’ the BBC’s decision. Who cares? Never before have the public had so much access to information at the source, via the Internet. The power newspapers wield is seriously diminished. Who cares what a rich outraged upper-middle class columnist has to say, certainly nothing of any worth on Nationalism.

3.) The left-fascists. As the anti-democratic ‘no-platform’ policy was destroyed in one fell swoop by the BBC the collective hard-left were seething, ‘those fascist-loving f*****s at the BBC will let Griffin go unchallenged, more votes for the BNP and acceptance into the mainstream! And now we hear they’re going to vet the audience for anti-fascists, this programme cannot be allowed to go ahead.’ I’m sure you won’t have missed the irony, censorship of the press and political opponents is a tactic of fascism. Having failed to threaten the BBC into submission the left-fascists are taking ‘direct-action’ in the attempt to silence Nick Griffin – a democratically elected representative. The breathtaking audacity to appoint themselves as the censors of free-speech is matched only by their arrogant contempt for the average British voter, if the BNP is full of nonsense as they say, then surely what we have to say will sink without a trace. No, the left-fascists know that what we have to say is based on common sense, it is precisely because they fear our words will carry weight with the British public that they want us silenced.

Finally the BBC is doing its job, with growing dissent over the licence-fee it should hardly be surprising that the corporation is starting to reach out -via the BNP – to Britain’s most forsaken community; the working class indigenous population. The question is do you trust them? After all the years of virulently anti-BNP reporting, stitch-up jobs and their aggressive multicultural agenda. Roll on Thursday 22nd.

It appears that most mainstream political parties within the United Kingdom are guilty of ‘cozying up to Islam’, like lemmings they follow each other in establishing close links with Islamic groups. Also, appointing Muslims to the House of Lords, which ultimately will lead to their collective downfall when Islam has taken every ‘olive branch’ offered, and made them into canes with which to beat any dissenters who dare to stand against their plans to turn the United Kingdom into yet another Islamic state.

It could be said that these political parties and some of their ‘ leading lights’ are guilty of treason, however the ‘ Treason Law ‘ has been abolished recently by Labour, intentional? Or just a ‘tidy up’ of some of our more archaic Laws, Laws which have stood the test of time and served this country and its citizens well for centuries, all abolished by the ‘Nu-Labour’ party.

It was Labour who began to bring Muslims into the UK after 1945, though in fairness the Conservative Party did nothing to staunch the flow of mass immigration from Pakistan, Bangladesh and other Muslim Countries during their terms in office.

When the various Governments allowed mass immigration, they should have realised that the aforementioned Muslims would bring their religion with them and want to build mosques, continue with their own traditions and culture and even modes of dress etc, to think otherwise was not just lack of foresight, but plain bloody stupid.
This stupidity has lead to clashes, accusations of racial and/or religious hatred, much of this could have been avoided if the Labour and Conservative parties had taken steps to limit the spread of Political Correctness, curb the power of extreme socialists and to place reasonable limits on immigration levels, instead we now find ourselves being overwhelmed and under serious threat from Islamic extremists who wish to turn the UK into an Islamic state.

Jack Straw has gone from being a somewhat radical Communist student, to become a Labour Party activist, followed by his election as an MP for Blackburn rising to ministerial level, has often been embroiled in issues regarding Islam, from the alleged funding scandal of the Blackburn mosque to the issue regarding Muslim women and the wearing of veils. Rather odd that,   it seems he has not raised the issue of Jews wearing skull- caps, Christians wearing crosses and Sikhs turbans. Perhaps Straw knew he would never have to act on his words.

He is however somewhat outspoken on issues concerning the British National Party (BNP), its members and supporters, on the issue of his forthcoming appearance on ” question time ” sharing the platform with Nick Griffin and other invited guests he is reported to have stated to BBC1’s The Politics Show North-West edition: “Wherever we have had BNP problems in my area and when we have fought them hard, we’ve pulled back and won the seats back. And that’s what we have to do. We’ve got to make the argument for people and I am delighted to do so.”

It seems that Jack Straw is all for democracy as long as the odds are in Labour’s favour, the programme will no doubt be a must watch for Nationalists and their opponents with possible surges on the electricity grids ( hope someone warns them ).

| Socialists cry “Power to the people”, and raise the clenched fist as they say it. We all know what they really mean—power over people, power to the State – Margaret Thatcher, 1986.|

Either Mr Straw has to accept that we live in a free country, or else he will have to promote openly the dictatorship, which he and his political cronies sometimes appear to prefer.

By Alley Cat

Against New and Blue Labour

After the recent Conservative Party Conference whereby Shadow Chancellor George Osborne vowed to freeze pay, increase the retirement age to 66, refused to abolish Labour’s 50% tax-rate for the wealthy as well as axing tax credits for families earning above £50,000; one has to ask, which party is this?

Cameron’s CONservatives are a far cry from the Tory party of yesteryear.

Which honest to God right winger would dream of backing such high tax rates in support of the welfare state, or what is effectively a redistribution of wealth when it comes to tax credit, not to mention a pro-immigration stance (irrespective of whether it is points based) at a time when Britain is on its knees with almost 3 million unemployed?

It would appear David Cameron and his ilk would feel more at home with the Labour Party.

One also has wonder over the likelihood of the Conservatives winning the next General Election. Unpopular as the Labour Party may seem at the moment, the Tories would have to win over the North East and overturn 117 seats nationwide in order to take power; all this with un-conservative and highly unappealing proposals means it is likely Britain could be facing a further four years of Labour tyranny, Blue or otherwise…

In this case, the Tories are barely the lesser of two evils. The UK’s democratic first-past-the-post system works in favour of either of the two parties and, whilst a vote for a minority party may seem like a vote for hope, the current circumstances are such that this kind of vote will hold little to no influence.

Action at the voting booth should be replaced by direct action on all levels. The Irish people were given the right to vote on the Lisbon treaty and upon an “unsatisfactory” two-fingered salute at the charter were yet again made to vote until they adhered to the wants of the powers that be.

The British were given no such “privilege”. We the people have had no real say in the matter despite a recent YouGov poll showing the majority of the population oppose the treaty.

It is clear the ballot is no good. The only alternative is to show our disapproval is via protest and civil disobedience.

It worked with the Poll Tax riots. The legislation was repealed. It can work again. The state can and will be pressured by the people to amend unsatisfactory proposals. We have no choice at the ballot box, but we do have a say in how we live. It is our RIGHT.

We are under no obligation to follow unjust law.

By Jersey Royal

Take a look at this photo below. It was captured at Labour’s disastrous 2009 national conference. Apart from Labour stealing another BNP slogan (Operation Fightback), what do you see that looks out of place?

That’s right, that evil Union flag, the sight of which usually arouses furious mutterings from leftists about that ‘disgusting’ chapter of British history – Empire.

Liebore has the audacity to fly the flag when elections are on the horizon, afterwards, the flag will be condemned by the Labour commissars as an emblem of racism and normal service will be resumed;

• Some Labour-controlled councils will refuse to fly the Union flag from their Town halls,
• Politicised police forces will order the removal of the flag from private property, as it is offensive,
• Nutty Islamic clerics will burn it on the streets of British cities, without consequence,
• Censors will continue to removed it from children’s books,
• Armed police will still be forced to remove the flag from their uniforms,
• Labour-backed UAF thugs will destroy it at the houses of BNP members,
• It will be flown at the same height as the EU flag.

Leftists like to throw out the famous words of Samuel Johnson: ‘Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel‘, they say this with a smirk only another smug leftist can replicate, but Johnson was referring to false patriotism, in which case this quote becomes rather apt when directed towards the Labour party, especially as Brown will be flat broke of refuges in a few short months.