Wilders and Entryism
I make apologies to the folks that have email subscribed to this site and have received this expletive laden post in your inbox. If bad language offends, please don’t read on. Thanks.
There was an eye-opening discussion on the Green Arrow paltalk last night. Mainly centred around the masturbatory adulation of Geert Wilders. Now, myself and a few other gentlemen expressed our lukewarm attitude towards Mr Wilders, having doubts about his international ties and motives. Not forgetting his, shall we say, less than respectful attitude towards the BNP.
Well, fuck me! Oh, you’d think it was heresy to question dear Geert. The attitude of the reprobates in that room confirmed some of the fears of my fellow ethno-nationalists:
1.) The party has focused upon Islamification for so long that it has attracted supporters whom have no other raison d’etre.
2.) Some members have absolutely no ideological grounding. Most don’t know what nationalism is, let alone ethno-nationalism.
The general consensus, lead by Bertie Bert, seems to be the belief that it’s Black & White: Wilders attacks Islam therefore Wilders is a Nationalist. Umm, hang on a minute, Wilders is a neo-con. The only major area that the BNP and his party share is an opposition to Islamification, little else.
This ideological indifference has permeated right down into the youngest of our supporters, the vile little prick known as ‘SAFCMAN’ conducted a disgraceful interview with the star of ‘Young Angry and White’, the ‘in-crowd’ applauded this reprobate like a bunch of circus seals. You may sense some anger in this paragraph. Well, that’s because SAFCMAN described me as Hitler. Him not having the intellect to understand why I do the things that I do for the good of the party.
It seems that SAFCMAN has been recorded telling racist jokes and using racial slurs, as a result of allowing communists and nazis to participate in his chatroom. Once again justifying the action I took to protect the fragile reputation of the party.
Not having a high tolerance for bullshit and stupidity, I carried on questioning the pronouncements that Wilders is ‘on our side’. Which lead to the questioning of my political allegiance. ‘I think you’re actually working against us’, said Bertie Bert.
I believe that this goes back to my insistence that Alby Walker was going to stand against Simon Darby. The newspaper that broke the story carried a DIRECT QUOTE from Alby saying that he was going to stand and that he needed £500 (which just happened to be the exact amount for an parliamentary election deposit). Oh no no no, I was just stirring up trouble, Alby wasn’t standing there, I’d bought the paper’s lies hook line and sinker, apparently.
Apparently not, I was right all along.
Who else has bothered to explained the basis of their nationalist beliefs? Such as I have (Here). Laying open my sentiments to the criticism of others. That’s right, none of my accusers.
Who else does more to protect the image of the party? Going against the tide of people that can’t keep their stupid fucking mouths shut; making enemies of strangers that would, in other circumstances, be counted as friends.
I do have personality clashes with some people, but it’s illogical to jump from thinking somebody is a prick, to thinking they must be infiltrators.
Following on from GA’s
We’ve come to the stage in the development of this site where it has become apparent that the three contributors cannot sustain the current traffic levels. We’re currently the highest ranked British Nationalist blog (globally) according to Alexa, although we trail the Green Arrow at second in the British rankings.
A few days after being accused of being a 








Recent Comments