1) The creation of ‘anti-racist’ offences - ‘Anti-racism’ is a relatively new concept, indeed, the word even fails to appear in many mainstream dictionaries. The most virulent attack on freedom of speech both written and verbal is the Incitement to Racial Hatred crime, which became an offence in 1976. The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 made the publication of ‘offensive’ material an arrestable offence.
Not that the British National Party (BNP) wants to incite racial hatred, but issues are difficult to discuss when you’re forever looking over your shoulder worried that you’re about to be arrested for voicing an opinion or writing a blog. How do you know what is offensive to somebody unless you offend in the first place?
If I was to say that knife crime in London is an issue primarily for the Black community, does this qualify as offensive material? Or am I inciting hatred of the Black community? A true statement which can be verified by research is no defence in a court of law, if you are hauled up for these offences. The Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006, established that inciting hatred of a person on the grounds of their religion as an offence, a handy law to stifle any comments against islamification.
2) Continual change to create confusion – Marxists have successfully criminalised, made taboo or changed the definition, of many British values, beliefs and even words. For Example, Racism, it used to have a pretty simple definition; the belief that one race is superior to another. There are now at least 20 definitions, all more convoluted than the next.
You have probably heard an elderly indigenous Brit refer to ethnic minorities as ‘coloureds’, only to be called down by their politically correct grand children, “Nan! That’s racist,” they whisper, afraid to be associated with such ‘vile hatred’ of the older generations. Of course, the term is not being used as a pejorative, but any adjective used to describe a different feature of an ethnic minority is automatically considered racist, it must be stamped out, made taboo and where possible, criminalised.
The older generations remember a time when they had real freedom of speech, the response they give their PC grand children is more often that not: ‘I’ll say what I damn well like.’ After all, who are the grand children to police their elder’s tongues and minds?
3) The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
Children as young as five have been taught about Homosexuality in classrooms across the UK. Teaching about homosexuality translates as the promotion of homosexuality, the insistence that it is normal. There are even children’s books where gay animals bring up their baby together, how mind-bending for a child of 5.
4) Mass immigration to destroy identity
The recent unprecedented scale of Mass immigration is partly down to Labour’s commitment to its business backers, and the need to keep the economic growth high. However, with the economy in reverse and immigrants still arriving in their hundreds of thousands – there must be another motive.
It appears that the population replacement in inner city areas is in an effort to disenfranchise the indigenous people from their country, culture and national identity. It could be argued that London is no longer British, it is the most ethnically diverse city in human history and soon a portrait of a Londoner will be of a non-indigenous face, if it isn’t already.
Considering the bigger picture; Marxists generally support a federal Europe, this involves the loss of sovereignty, redrawing of borders and creation of regions spreading across former national boundaries. To achieve this aim – when dealing with an Island people with an Island national psyche – is difficult, it cannot be done in the open, for the people will reject it. It has to be done gradually, ‘baby-steps’ if you like. The downgrading of Britain Personified; Britannia, Signing of the Lisbon treaty behind closed doors, new twenty pound notes that look like Euros.
Is English an option on official application forms? Welsh is.
5) The undermining of a teacher’s authority
A teacher was once a respected member of a community, chances were, if your teacher gave you dressing down at school you would receive twice as much at home. Now, a teacher can be suspended for merely raising their voice at a child, a far cry from when punishment was meted out with a caning, a rap across the knuckles with a ruler, or even a slap across the chops.
Couple this loss of authority in the classroom with the proliferation of single parent families and you have a recipe for disaster. Male children with no authoritarian father figure at home enter a class room environment where they know that the teacher is powerless to properly discipline them. No discipline at home, no discipline at school, a fast track to prison. On top of this; modern male teachers are often feminised, having received their indoctrination via their PGCE course. The Post graduate certification in Education which weeds out any undesirable potential teachers, leaving only the select few who swear to uphold and defend the Marxist symptoms of the sick British society.
Male teachers who wish to teach young children are put off by the sneering suspicions of others, of course, a male teacher wanting to teach young children means he must be a paedophile, right? He obviously doesn’t want the job because of the enormous satisfaction that can be gained by watching your pupils succeed?
6) The promotion of drink and drugs.
Soaps such as ‘Eastenders’ have the majority of their scenes in the pub, it doesn’t matter what time of day it is, the characters are always ‘going for a drink’. New shows like Channel 4’s teenage drama ‘Skins’ regularly promotes class A substances, usually a taken as a cocktail with alcohol.
Writers argue that their story lines mirror society, if this was the case, ‘Eastenders’ would have an all ethnic minority cast with a token indigenous family. Furthermore, how does a 50-year-old script writer know what goes on in the lives of teenagers today? He may go to cocaine fuelled TV executive parties and think that is standard British behavior.
The drive to downgrade Cannabis is wrong. I know several people who started on weed, and eventually progressed to stronger strains, or class A drugs. Four of them are in a mental institution and the other five are on the way, one is so paranoid he refuses to answer his door or the telephone and the other can’t even remember reading the book he described and recommended to me in detail the week previously.
But Hey, everyone is doing it, right?
7) Emptying of Churches
Christianity is dying a death in Western Europe and yet still there are groups who will attack the Church relentlessly. Humanist organisation such as The Secular Society often wheel out their intellectuals as champions to further savage and humiliate some dimwit from the church.
The ever egotistical Christopher Hitchens and the posh Professor Richard Dawkins being their most accomplished destroyers.
However, you will not find an equal amount of the Humanist’s venom spared for Islam, oh no, Islam is untouchable, despite it being the fastest growing cult in the world, one which will not long tolerate secularism in the nations it occupies; they will not take it on.
Who knows? Maybe they’re scared of a fatwa. There’s a pattern emerging here.
8) An unreliable legal system with bias against the victims of crime
I would direct you to the Tony Martin case, the farmer who – tired with being robbed repeatedly – fatally wounded a gypsy burglar. He went to prison for manslaughter.
9) Dependency on state via state benefits
Why work when you can have 7 children and all the state benefit that it will generate. There is no incentive for working class teenagers with little or no qualifications to go out and earn £10,000 a year when several children will provide near enough the same amount, plus no rent to pay, increased disposable income for fags and booze.
If the state gravy train was suddenly derailed it would probably cause a humanitarian disaster, civil disorder and famine. The UK now has millions of people who can’t live without the state, these are not stupid people, they’ve merely been raised to depend upon the authorities, they know no different.
The threat of withdrawing benefits may be a handy tool for the state to use. “You vill do as ve say, or no deutschmarks vor your vodka!”
10) Control or dumbing down of media
The comic book for retards; ‘The Sun’ is the most popular newspaper in the land.
The BBC constantly shelves the last remaining high quality documentaries that it produces in favour of ‘reality TV’ and outrageously salaried chat show hosts.
11) Encouraging the breakdown of the family
The femimarxists in the media get a kick out of portraying the male and more importantly the role of father as obsolete. Part of the communist doctrine is the desire to force the wife away from the dependency on the bread winning husband, to dependency upon the state or society.
They also knew that women are more receptive to equality fantasies and the like when faced with hardship outside of a stable family unit.
12) Multi-Culturalism
The system which ensures immigrants never integrate, as well as allowing them to claim their own chunk of land. An inherently racist policy as it insinuates that immigrants cannot possibly be assimilated into the host culture.
The multicultural ideology states that multiple communities can or do live in relative harmony, however, even before forcing alien communities into an ever decreasing space, friction between neighbouring indigenous cultures was evident. For example, on the English – Welsh border pubs would have signs reading “No Dogs, No Welshman” up until a few decades ago.
The difference between now and then is that the people generally shared ethnicity, religion and a common language which served as a social cement. The same bonds that had held the nation together in the face of impending invasion during WW2.
13) Political Correctness
A code of conduct regarding your language, early usage involved self censorship of language to adhere to views that are socially acceptable. Today, this means you are politically incorrect if you voice opposition to Islam, mass immigration, multiculturalism and so on. These doctrines have been given unassailable positions as key parts of the New Labour Marxist ideology.
PC was used to great effect by Chairman Mao, the leader of the Chinese Communist Party, and leader of the People’s Republic of China from 1949 to 1976. The Chinese peasantry learned to guard their tongues in case what they said contradicted Marxism or Maoism, in other words they avoided political incorrectness, for which the penalty was jail, death, or both. In the UK the penalty can be Jail for speaking out against Islamification.
Given the political history of some of Labour’s most senior apparatchiks it is not difficult to see where they recieved their inspiration for the destruction of Britain. Communist China, Russia, take your pick.
Conclusion
Theses symptoms are all interlinked, there are patterns emerging when you consider them together. The protection of Islam and Muslims from criticism is strikingly similar to the rules in Mao’s China – it is almost as if it is THE state religion, beyond reproach. The Islamic belief that Muslims owe allegiance only to the nation of Islam and that actual nations require no allegiance, suits the Marxists no end, with their belief in a world without borders, nations and flags.
It seems the Marxists are willing to use the Muslims as their conquering army, the Muslims should realise that in a Marxist world there would be no worshipping of Allah, the only worship allowed would be of Marxism itself.
A temporary alliance between western Marxists and Muslims - Islamo-Marxism?
As much as these fools like to claim that they’re ‘concerned local residents’, for the most part they are parachuted in from all over the UK. At Durham University, the decision to allow or not to allow active democracy should have been a decision taken by the student union, as elected officials. Not by failed students of the 60’s and the young social-retards of the UAF.
Recent Comments