The British Nationalist

Foreword

This question was posed by a potential supporter; what follows is my subjective response. I hope you will add your thoughts and feelings on the question, to the comments section below.

M. Wood

You’re either a Nationalist or an Internationalist. Britain has arguably been internationalist since the beginning of our Empire-building. Some say Britain is run by, or for, the interest of big business. Big multinational conglomerates.

Britain has existed for too long as nothing more than a collection of consumers with a handy army should anything or anyone threaten the money-maker’s designs. At the height of Empire, Britain had 4 million unemployed at home; is internationalism nothing more than the ability to exploit cheap foreign labour at the expense of one’s own people? Demanding that these people, who once made commodities with their own hands, purchase products made by the hands of those whom now have their jobs and livelihood.

Sure, you can earn £20k in the service industry, but come retirement, what have you done but been a conduit between your people and internationalist corporations? Worse still, you may have traded your man power to produce wealth for other nations and peoples. After 45 years of work, you have not produced anything that will outlast you. There’s no testament to your existence, you did not produce anything, bar digits on a screen or worthless paper money.

Contrast this with the British archaeological artifacts such as jewellery or instruments of toil. They stand as a record of the daily-life of our ancestors, they have soul because they were made by human hand and mind. A visit to Stonehenge is an almost spiritual experience for those in pursuit of a connection with their ancestors. They leave an indelible mark that speaks to you from ages past – ‘we were here, we lived, we loved and we died.’

I am a nationalist because being British is more than just reverence for some hero involved in a glorious battle-field story from our rich history, or some cultural practice that is under siege from PC bureaucracy. No, it’s more tangible than that. Nationalists stand to protect and promote a nation’s most valuable asset, something real – its people.

‘I pay my taxes!’ Cry the recent arrivals, as if this is the major factor in judging one’s claims that they’re British. Our people have paid taxes, generation after generation. Our forebears paid a higher price, paid in blood, during the internationalist elites’ political repositioning on continental chessboards.

Of course, there are people facing hardship in the world. The hardship of our ancestors is not taught; is it taught that the life expectancy of early Britons was once just 24? Or that British mothers would often commit infanticide — murdering their babies — in anticipation of crop failures? Our people came through famine, plague, warfare and oppression – never abandoning this island when circumstances conspired to persuade them that emigration was the answer. They stayed and weathered the times. Would those almost broken people have persevered if they could foresee the dispossession of their lands when entrusted to our generation’s stewardship?

But all of this does not answer the question. Understanding of the hardship experienced by our people and the overall human story of our Island, this human history will endear you to British Nationalism. If it doesn’t? Then you have no heart, no soul; you have no national empathy and you cannot describe yourself as British. Let alone a British Nationalist.

‘We’re all human’, spit the multicultists and it is only human to desire to live amongst your own people in your own land.

I’m sure many of you will have watched Young, Angry and White on Channel 4 last Friday, if not, here’s the link – It is highly recommended.

Despite the blurb describing the documentary, the short film isn’t really about the BNP. The star of the show, 19-yr-old Kieren, says that he is considering joining the BNP.

At first, you imagine the usual caricature. Some young, chavvy bloke who left school at 14. Not in this case! I was quite impressed with Kieren, he understands his ideology and was able to put it forward in a manner that many older nationalists couldn’t.

However, when the camera crew attended his BBQ, you will have noticed the flags draped over his garden fence. I knew then that this lad was going to have issues with the BNP’s direction – he is a racial-nationalist, the BNP are not.  His water and ink analogy made me cringe, I’m not saying he was incorrect, biologically speaking he is correct, it was just a very crude way of explaining the concept to a group of young, mugsheeple.

You quickly get the impression that Kieren has been influenced by some of the more eccentric nationalists. I know he has been because I’ve read his posts on the Stormfront forum, not exactly the best place to learn about political nationalism.

Near the end of the footage Kieren discovers that we’re making amendments to our constitution. He doesn’t like it, and so he joins the National Front. Which makes a mockery of the documentary as I believe there was never any question of him joining the BNP. He is a racial-nationalist and – as a young lad – he is attracted to the grittier factions of nationalism. (Before anybody says that the BNP is a racial nationalist party, it isn’t. The new constitution states that we are ethno-nationalist)

I feel that Kieren is too good for the NF, he will probably rise rapidly within the organisation, as he actually has a brain. Then again, hopefully, he will see the dead-end that is political racial-nationalism and ‘modify’ (I prefer upgrade) his ideology.

The documentary appears to be ‘bigging up’ the NF, which of course makes sense to the enemies of nationalism. Austria has two successful nationalist parties, combined they could  probably win control of the country, whilst apart, they are competing against each other and their potential is diluted.

I don’t believe that it had very much to do with the BNP but it is still worth watching. Channel 4 have been a little bit sly, they purposely didn’t pick the stereotypical young, white male that I described earlier. If they did, it is easier to laugh at that caricature and pretend we’re all just thick, little bigots on the fringes of society. Channel 4 has chosen a normal lad, albeit an ideologue – for one reason; It scares people.

It’s still quite a shame to lose a recruit of Kieren’s quality.

According to posters over on the Northwest Nationalists forum, BNP activists that took part in the European election campaign, ‘are not Nationalists‘.

The author doesn’t qualify this statement, but another poster agrees and offers up the Magna Carter (Habeas Corpus Act 1679), specifically the section which details the supremacy of parliament.

I agree. To participate in EU elections amounts to a recognition of its legitimacy. True nationalists should adhere to the British constitution as embodied in Magna Carta, the Act of Supremacy and the Bill of Rights.

Their argument is that the BNP gave legitimacy to the European machine because it took part in the European elections. This fits in with the general consensus of the ex-BNP’ers that the party should have concentrated on the local elections, and completely abandoned any electoral assault for European representation. This stance was espoused by John Tyndall before, during and after the Euro election of 2004, the results probably proved him correct for that election.

They don’t seem to understand what a political party actually is. It exists to compete in the electoral process, to gain political representation for the forgotten silent majority. It is not a drinking club. It is as if these people just keep looking for more nasty little insults to throw around, disregarding that the Euro victory was the greatest ever achieved by a British Nationalist party. Certainly trumping anything these maggots will ever achieve, personally, or politically.

And another thing.

Hadley is seriously deluded if he believes the membership will vote overwhelmingly to defeat the amendments. Does he think that this is the 90’s? Even ‘Shady’ Graham branded him a ‘useless organiser’, and he has even bigger problems ahead; if the allegations made against him recently, are true.

With notable exceptions, why do those whom are thrown out of the party turn around and wail about how great they were? If this is the case – why haven’t you all banded together and created a purist nationalist party driven by legions of expelled super-activists? Those ex-activists that I have had the displeasure to run into were largely illiterate, an embarrassment to themselves and the BNP. They are oblivious to how much of a joke they really are, when you have no self-respect to begin with, you never know that you lack it. I suppose we can’t expect those whom are devoid of self-respect, to bestow respect on others.

A few years ago, during the ‘December rebellion’ I tried to stay impartial, as to get a clear view of the situation, and as I had friends on both sides. In fact it may surprise SOME people that I am STILL friends with Colin Auty.

Nothing to do with what he or I politically believe, but the fact that we actually get on with each other.

Anyway one thing that stood out during the conflict to me was that they (the said rebels) posted a video of Mark Collett getting threatened by some Nutzis, and clearly in distress. Now whether you disagree with someone, or if you don’t even like them, showing a video like that in a public place not only made me cringe but destroyed any respectability to their cause.

I am glad it did.

Whilst surfing the net I came across this old article.

Take special note of the bits I have highlighted.

Membership List Leak – A Response

It is unfortunate that a response has to be made regarding the disgusting accusations emanating from the lie filled mouth of Nick Griffin, yet in order to set the record straight we feel that a response is indeed necessary.

Firstly we would like to point out that the publication of the BNP membership list is a treacherous act which will have repercussions for the entire Party and nationalism in general. Whoever has done this should be utterly ashamed of their spiteful actions. Whatever the reasons for the publication of the list, ordinary BNP members should not have to suffer because of the crass incompetence, flawed personality and arrogance of the Party Leader.

The BNP website carries an “urgent update” from the BNP leader, Nick Griffin. This update blatantly accuses those involved in the December 2007 dispute, which had its source concern expressed by several leading Party members and senior officials over the disgraceful protection by the Chairman of two individuals who had brought and continue to bring the Party into disrepute and heap embarrassment through their incompetence, immaturity and selfish behaviour. Griffin, a man who like so many contemptible politicians can be detected lying when his mouth open’s hardly conceals his ill-founded and thoroughly false suspicions that Kenny Smith, the previous Head of Administration, of being responsible for the publication. This is a disgrace and a downright lie. None of the six people involved in the April 2007 court case want to see the BNP suffer at all. Moreover, they certainly do not want to see the thoroughly decent members and activists suffer at the hands of filthy communist scum. Seeing Nick Griffin get his deserved comeuppance is one thing, harming the Party is completely different. Neither Kenny Smith, nor any of the other co-defendants who Griffin and Darby took to court leaked/published the database.

Nick Griffin has clearly landed himself in very hot water by alleging that the publication of the list proves ‘Contempt of Court’. He says that the web host’s legal department has been contacted by the BNP and that the BNP are liaising with their solicitors about how to use this against the six defendants in the ongoing court action.
We would dearly like to see the BNP find out who did this and we would like to see them brought to book. When the real culprit is found we will be expecting a full public apology from Griffin, with damages for the smearing of our names.

In reality, the publication of the membership lists simply shows the contempt in which Griffin holds the BNP membership. By allowing gross inefficiencies in BNP departments (which was the main reason behind the December crisis whereby sickened national officials could not take any more incompetence from two departments and were sacked for speaking out) Griffin is to blame. The fact that up to a dozen (possibly more?) people may have, or have had a full database is bad enough when the database is the BNP’s prize asset. However, the real problem is that Nick Griffin has such a terrible record for falling out with senior BNP officials who criticise him in any way that the list of his enemies is seemingly endless. Because of the way in which Griffin treats those who have given their all for the BNP, he creates a rod for his own back in that some people (in this case misguidedly) may do things which damage the BNP in an attempt to attack Griffin himself.

Further, the rather arrogant way in which the BNP web team and Griffin himself dismiss the membership leak as ‘a publicity bonus’ is truly shocking when you consider that many members and activists with a sensitive job have now been exposed to violent communist bully boys and their backers at Searchlight and UAF. We have already had calls from people who have had such threatening calls and our sympathies go out to them. For Griffin to brush this off, and to wrongly claim that ‘former employees’ were to blame is beneath contempt. Griffin has once again shown just how little he really thinks of the everyday BNP member.

We suggest that the Party Chairman:

1.) Immediately apologises to the six court defendants (who have never been found guilty of anything despite the malicious Griffin/Darby prosecution) and to Kenny Smith in particular.

2.) Actually contacts Dyfed-Powys Police rather than just pretending so, in order to start the ball rolling as to who did actually leak the list.

3.) Actually contacts the web host’s legal department and gets them to shut down the offending websites.

4.) Starts to act in the interests of the members and not operate once more in a zone of self-survival which leads to utter contempt for the feelings of the average BNP member.

Just a little food for thought on how close we nearly came to bowing to the wishes of these people. Let’s make sure we’re not naive enough to let it happen again.

By Joey Smith

UKIP’s London Chairman Paul Wiffen took great delight in telling me that I was lying about everything in the last article, I must have just made it all up off the top of my head.

They have actually dumped poor Winston Mckenzie and gone for the rabid gay-hater, failed footballer, failed jockey, one-time chef and boxing manager Frank Maloney. Nobody knew about this development, apart from very few of the mugs in (E)UKIP.

Maloney stood in the 2004 London mayoralty election, securing 6.19% of the vote and fourth place. During this very campaign, he refused to canvass Camden because there were ‘too many gays’.

The ponces of the UKIP London hierarchy probably think Maloney’s non-PC outbursts will endear him to the indigenous folks of Barking – the ones that haven’t been ethnically cleansed, yet. We’ll see, maybe Wiffen can make a documentary about it.

We hope he is ready to take on the BNP-Machine, after all, it was only two months ago that he suffered a heart attack. No Mercy, prepare to be crushed, Maloney.

(Gay BNP supporters are urged to participate in the Barking Campaign)

After the Spanish Nationalist Conference attended by Nick Griffin was attacked by the fascist admirers of Francisco Franco, the EDL has been on the offensive. Take a look at this charming little message, below.

“edl (EDL), mickey mouse? You mugs, where (we’re) not state-funded or even state-run, you thick, dole dossing, idiots , not one of you job less (Jobless) bums know the script , WE ARE ENGLAND, WE ARE THE SAVIOUR, and (if) any of you mugs keep calling us a little outfit…

You‘ll see on yer (your) next demo, when we turn up and turn you lot out !!!! And make it an EDL demo , you forget we‘re  getting bigger than you and it (has only) been 3 months !!!!”

(The parts in red are my corrections, it’s almost unreadable without it.)

Message received from an official English Defence League email address.

Let us break down this little comment, and forget that it represents a sad barometer of the British education system.

A state-run organisation doesn’t necessarily have somebody right at the top, actually running the day-to-day business of the organisation. The fact that they have been given free-rein to rampage around some of Britain’s largest cities is proof enough for some, that something isn’t quite right here, and that it may indicate state-manipulation. Only this weekend they uncovered a UAF plant within their ranks, which caused considerable uproar amongst the EDL Facebook community.

Again, with state-funding, you can’t seriously believe the state will send a nice little bundle of notes inside an envelope with HM Crown MI5 emblazoned across the front. Field Operatives are given an allowance with which they make donations to organisations. This is almost impossible to guard against when using a third-party online payment processor, such as paypal, which is the service that the EDL use.

Yes, we’re all knuckle-dragging thugs. All on benefits. Next.

The sight of 70-100 EDL lads getting chased out of London by 1,000 enrichers hardly inspires me to confirm, that, you are indeed, the White Knight we’ve all been waiting for. You are a growing – but still small – organisation. As are the BNP, whose membership should exceed 15,000 this coming January, coupled with our supporters, silent or otherwise, we’re looking at twice that figure as a total. Suggestions that you’re anywhere near approaching our size are well off the mark.

I can assure you that you won’t be seeing us (as the BNP) on your next demo, we don’t do street marching. You have us confused with the various hardline nationalist groups that have attached themselves to your cause. The same people that you surrounded and thrashed a few months ago.

One last thing, I notice your site offers a uniform for purchase – that in itself is of questionable legality – which suggests that you personalise your shirt with the name of your Town/City. Why not go the whole hog and have your name,address and shoe size embroidered onto the shirt. Saves police time when identifying you from the footage, doesn’t it?

Having said all this, I wouldn’t be ungrateful if you did manage to run the UAF off the streets.

The chart is from Political Betting.com a good source of mostly unbiased material, money where the mouth is tends make people’s opinions more honest.

They used the chart to show the difference between vote share when spread across the whole of the country against only those seats fought between Labour and the Tories. But my interest went down the chart to the BNP see how the percentage rose from 0.7% nationally – which the opponents of the BNP love to bang on about – against the figure of 4.3% average across all 119 seats which the BNP fought, this average is 1.5% higher than that of UKIP.

You will also see if we could harness the nearly a million voters which we got out in the euro election. We would have a clear 4th place and I am sure be winning seats in the next election. The challenge is to get those voters out, the tools is reports like this, it is all in how you decipher and promote the figures, you can say the BNP only got less than one percent or you can promote that we were 6 times better than that.

By Election Correspondent

There is confusion spread throughout the party. Some are asking why we have to amend our constitution, some are questioning their ideology and some are taking a long hard look at their political allegiance. They are right to be unsure.  We are walking a tightrope. If we falter now, the BNP will never secure parliamentary representation for the indigenous peoples of these isles.

A cocksure Tory once said that Labour would never be elected again. A few years previously James Callaghan’s Old Labour  government had fallen. It was widely believed that the party then in its present incarnation would never capture the support of middle England again. The signs were there in 1974 (and arguably decades earlier), when they had been forced to form a minority government, short of a majority by 33 seats. The belief that the public had lost faith – and many were suspicious of anything remotely resembling communism – in a socialist party was borne out over the course of the next three general elections, they failed in 83, 87, and 92.

Labour bigwigs needed to make the party more attractive to the middle-class, it was vital that they try to move away from its socialist stance to free-market policies. There was considerable opposition from the elder members and the hardcore ‘reds’. Like the BNP, Labour had constitutional issues, the infamous clause four, which detailed Labour’s commitment to Nationalisation and wealth redistribution, but it was also a stick for their own back, often attacked by their opponents.

In 1992, Labour were expected to defeat the Tories. Labour lost, and this was a wake up call for the party, it gave impetus to the architects of the New Labour project. Labour ratified Blair’s clause four constitutional amendments in 1995. This represented the final step from Old Labour to New Labour, and two years later, they won, massively.

2004 was our wake up call, it was supposed to be the year that the BNP finally broke into the big time, we were going to win several seats at the European election. Perhaps we should have realised that the media weren’t attacking us because we we didn’t pose a threat, and they were right, we were agonisingly close in Nick’s North-West region, but ultimately we failed. The party had overextended itself financially, morale was very low, and then, Nick announced the unthinkable, we were going to have to amend our membership criteria. There was big opposition from the membership, and the plan was abandoned, but not forgotten.

Five years later, high on victory, the amendments first suggested in 2004 were now being forced onto us by the establishment. The first hurdle has been navigated – the voting membership has selected a proposal from the Chairman to go to the party membership to ratify our constitutional amendments. The membership now holds in their hands the one chance we have to break away from the remnants of the old party that hold us back. For some, this may be a very bitter pill to swallow, but tell me: Is it as bitter as all the years of failure you have endured?

Remember;

We are still Ethno-Nationalists,

We still oppose mass immigration,

We are still committed to dismantling Multiculturalism,

We will leave the European Union.

The major difference between ethno-nationalism and racial-nationalism, is that the former recognises loyalty to your ethnic group before that of your race. Think of your country, culture and heritage before that of the kindred ethnicities. This may come as a surprise, but the British have been betrayed, bullied and in some cases slaughtered by those whom racial-nationalists would consider their brethren. It’s just a reconsideration, a repositioning of your world view and priorities.

From 1982 to 1999, the BNP was like a small child, uncouth, politically unpalatable, electorally toxic, too influenced by the movements that gave birth to it. We are now at the adolescence stage of our development, and it is painful. We are at the brink of passing into adulthood, political maturity, and like a youngster that has outgrown his peers, we most move on. Move on to electoral success and become a parliamentary party.

However, we must not cast aside those whom were there in the beginning, but they must accept that the tyranny we face now was allowed to manifest itself on their watch, their brand of nationalism was unacceptable to the electorate, it was a complete failure, they must accept and correct those failings, and they must adapt. Those that have done so, now lead the party.

This is our ‘clause four moment’.

Following on from GA’s article about nationalist sites linking each other etc, I notice that there are still only 16 of our BNP supporting sites listed in the Total Politics blog directory.

Myself and GA have have called for blog owners to register their sites on this big traffic generating site, but to no avail it seems, bar 5 or 6 blogs. Even UKIP has 29 blogs registered, and apart from one or two, all their support sites are a pile of dung.

There are around 40 pro-BNP sites that are yet to get themselves listed in the directory, most of them are in the regional nationalists list on this site. Getting yourself listed on a search engine isn’t enough, Google can only generate so many visitors.

None of the more official BNP blogs (sites run by officials) carry any links at all. Well, fine, but this site does not link any sites that refuse to reciprocate. Sites without any links at all consider themselves ‘too good’ and don’t need to build up outgoing and incoming links, or the owner is technologically retarded. Only, none of the BNP support sites have traffic figures that indicate no need to build up internal traffic – Simon Darby’s and GA’s being the most visited, the former site could have a higher rating, but I refuse to link it without receiving the same courtesy.

I think it all comes down to the argument about content, BNP bloggers can’t be trusted not to write something that will tar other sites by association. That’s an insult to most of us. We don’t receive payment for generating all this interest for the party, we’re outnumbered heavily by the amount of Tory/Labour blogs, and consistently punch above our weight. A little bit of acknowledgement wouldn’t go amiss, maybe an offer to link back,  it would be nice. We’ve got a massive year ahead of us, the BNP blog network could mean the difference between a candidate becoming a BNP member of parliament or us uttering empty words about coming second.

Go here, get your blog put into the BNP directory, let’s overtake UKIP.

Here is a video of me at this years Red, White and Blue festival. Hope you find it interesting.
Joey Smith @ RWB 2009