The British Nationalist

Foreword

This question was posed by a potential supporter; what follows is my subjective response. I hope you will add your thoughts and feelings on the question, to the comments section below.

M. Wood

You’re either a Nationalist or an Internationalist. Britain has arguably been internationalist since the beginning of our Empire-building. Some say Britain is run by, or for, the interest of big business. Big multinational conglomerates.

Britain has existed for too long as nothing more than a collection of consumers with a handy army should anything or anyone threaten the money-maker’s designs. At the height of Empire, Britain had 4 million unemployed at home; is internationalism nothing more than the ability to exploit cheap foreign labour at the expense of one’s own people? Demanding that these people, who once made commodities with their own hands, purchase products made by the hands of those whom now have their jobs and livelihood.

Sure, you can earn £20k in the service industry, but come retirement, what have you done but been a conduit between your people and internationalist corporations? Worse still, you may have traded your man power to produce wealth for other nations and peoples. After 45 years of work, you have not produced anything that will outlast you. There’s no testament to your existence, you did not produce anything, bar digits on a screen or worthless paper money.

Contrast this with the British archaeological artifacts such as jewellery or instruments of toil. They stand as a record of the daily-life of our ancestors, they have soul because they were made by human hand and mind. A visit to Stonehenge is an almost spiritual experience for those in pursuit of a connection with their ancestors. They leave an indelible mark that speaks to you from ages past – ‘we were here, we lived, we loved and we died.’

I am a nationalist because being British is more than just reverence for some hero involved in a glorious battle-field story from our rich history, or some cultural practice that is under siege from PC bureaucracy. No, it’s more tangible than that. Nationalists stand to protect and promote a nation’s most valuable asset, something real – its people.

‘I pay my taxes!’ Cry the recent arrivals, as if this is the major factor in judging one’s claims that they’re British. Our people have paid taxes, generation after generation. Our forebears paid a higher price, paid in blood, during the internationalist elites’ political repositioning on continental chessboards.

Of course, there are people facing hardship in the world. The hardship of our ancestors is not taught; is it taught that the life expectancy of early Britons was once just 24? Or that British mothers would often commit infanticide — murdering their babies — in anticipation of crop failures? Our people came through famine, plague, warfare and oppression – never abandoning this island when circumstances conspired to persuade them that emigration was the answer. They stayed and weathered the times. Would those almost broken people have persevered if they could foresee the dispossession of their lands when entrusted to our generation’s stewardship?

But all of this does not answer the question. Understanding of the hardship experienced by our people and the overall human story of our Island, this human history will endear you to British Nationalism. If it doesn’t? Then you have no heart, no soul; you have no national empathy and you cannot describe yourself as British. Let alone a British Nationalist.

‘We’re all human’, spit the multicultists and it is only human to desire to live amongst your own people in your own land.

300 of the BNP membership voted yes to constitutional amendments allowing ethnic minorities to join the party.

Good.

As for the opponents, they’re now trying to claim that the motion couldn’t have been carried because thousands of members did not vote. It was a party-wide ballot; they knew where the EGM was to be held. Claiming that Northern members couldn’t get down to the south is laughable, if it was held in the North, how would the Southern members attend?

I’m sure many of you will have watched Young, Angry and White on Channel 4 last Friday, if not, here’s the link – It is highly recommended.

Despite the blurb describing the documentary, the short film isn’t really about the BNP. The star of the show, 19-yr-old Kieren, says that he is considering joining the BNP.

At first, you imagine the usual caricature. Some young, chavvy bloke who left school at 14. Not in this case! I was quite impressed with Kieren, he understands his ideology and was able to put it forward in a manner that many older nationalists couldn’t.

However, when the camera crew attended his BBQ, you will have noticed the flags draped over his garden fence. I knew then that this lad was going to have issues with the BNP’s direction – he is a racial-nationalist, the BNP are not.  His water and ink analogy made me cringe, I’m not saying he was incorrect, biologically speaking he is correct, it was just a very crude way of explaining the concept to a group of young, mugsheeple.

You quickly get the impression that Kieren has been influenced by some of the more eccentric nationalists. I know he has been because I’ve read his posts on the Stormfront forum, not exactly the best place to learn about political nationalism.

Near the end of the footage Kieren discovers that we’re making amendments to our constitution. He doesn’t like it, and so he joins the National Front. Which makes a mockery of the documentary as I believe there was never any question of him joining the BNP. He is a racial-nationalist and – as a young lad – he is attracted to the grittier factions of nationalism. (Before anybody says that the BNP is a racial nationalist party, it isn’t. The new constitution states that we are ethno-nationalist)

I feel that Kieren is too good for the NF, he will probably rise rapidly within the organisation, as he actually has a brain. Then again, hopefully, he will see the dead-end that is political racial-nationalism and ‘modify’ (I prefer upgrade) his ideology.

The documentary appears to be ‘bigging up’ the NF, which of course makes sense to the enemies of nationalism. Austria has two successful nationalist parties, combined they could  probably win control of the country, whilst apart, they are competing against each other and their potential is diluted.

I don’t believe that it had very much to do with the BNP but it is still worth watching. Channel 4 have been a little bit sly, they purposely didn’t pick the stereotypical young, white male that I described earlier. If they did, it is easier to laugh at that caricature and pretend we’re all just thick, little bigots on the fringes of society. Channel 4 has chosen a normal lad, albeit an ideologue – for one reason; It scares people.

It’s still quite a shame to lose a recruit of Kieren’s quality.

Over the past few weeks there has been a sharp increase in the amount of anti-BNP agitators. They’ve tried to embed themselves into the social network, the chat rooms and the blogs – even creating a few new blogs.

With this in mind, it was decided to resurrect the old site, but not running at the same level as the previous ‘magazine’ site. Hence the more minimal styling. Some of you will be happy to hear that I managed to salvage all the author’s posts and comments, others less so.

In the coming weeks the British National Party membership will be making the biggest decision ever asked of them. Our enemies know this, they hope that by some interference they can drive a wedge into the membership, causing splits or factions.

The newest little addition to the anti-BNP blog army is claiming that it represents 70+ ex-BNP members. However, the description gives the game away:

“A GROWING GROUP OF EX PARTY MEMBERS TO EXPOSE THE HIDDEN AGENDA OF THIS VICIOUS PARTY TO MEMBERS OF THE VOTING PUBLIC AND TO CURRENT UNSUSPECTING MEMBERS WHO ARE BEING BRAINWASHED.

ANY EX MEMBERS WHO HAVE TRUE EVENTS AND STORIES TO TELL THEN PLEASE GET IN TOUCH.”

Now, the majority of ex-members have left because they believe the party has moved away from its original ideology. Some believe the party isn’t ‘vicious’ enough, they certainly don’t think it has grown too aggressive for them since Nick Griffin took over in 1999. So, who else thinks the party is ‘vicious’, couldn’t be our anti-fascist pals, could it?

Secondly, the blog author is claiming that they have raised £4,000 to stand independent candidates against BNP parliamentary candidates. The reasoning behind the move raises further questions about those running the blog, and their real agenda:

“The only reason we will do this is to strategically split the votes and Help to lose the BNP their deposits , We have no political agenda other than to Protect the General public from these Crooks whom are just wanting to bleed the country dry.”

Right, because if you wanted to raid the country’s bare coffers you would pick a small, fringe nationalist party as a vehicle to do it, wouldn’t you? Nonsense. And nonsense is what constitutes the vast majority of the postings on the site. The facts can be found if only you search.

The final piece of evidence offered up should leave you in no doubt as to the nature of the people behind it. Every post labels a senior activist or official as a ‘racist’, including Martin Wingfield, Michael Elliot, Clive Jefferson, and Eddy Butler.

There is a twist – the site claims to be run by our pals from the now defunct BNP reform group. The site author considers the National Front as a ‘viable alternative’ to the BNP, yet perceives no irony in labelling BNP folk as racist, whilst attempting to reconstruct a racial-nationalist party. Perhaps this development lends weight to those who claimed that the reformists weren’t interested in politics, merely interested in bringing the BNP down. If this isn’t the case, you have to ask why they haven’t simply taken their skills to the National Front and let us get on with our political activities.

You can view the pitiful blog here. Let them know what you think of their lies and schemes.

—————————————————————————–

According to posters over on the Northwest Nationalists forum, BNP activists that took part in the European election campaign, ‘are not Nationalists‘.

The author doesn’t qualify this statement, but another poster agrees and offers up the Magna Carter (Habeas Corpus Act 1679), specifically the section which details the supremacy of parliament.

I agree. To participate in EU elections amounts to a recognition of its legitimacy. True nationalists should adhere to the British constitution as embodied in Magna Carta, the Act of Supremacy and the Bill of Rights.

Their argument is that the BNP gave legitimacy to the European machine because it took part in the European elections. This fits in with the general consensus of the ex-BNP’ers that the party should have concentrated on the local elections, and completely abandoned any electoral assault for European representation. This stance was espoused by John Tyndall before, during and after the Euro election of 2004, the results probably proved him correct for that election.

They don’t seem to understand what a political party actually is. It exists to compete in the electoral process, to gain political representation for the forgotten silent majority. It is not a drinking club. It is as if these people just keep looking for more nasty little insults to throw around, disregarding that the Euro victory was the greatest ever achieved by a British Nationalist party. Certainly trumping anything these maggots will ever achieve, personally, or politically.

And another thing.

Hadley is seriously deluded if he believes the membership will vote overwhelmingly to defeat the amendments. Does he think that this is the 90’s? Even ‘Shady’ Graham branded him a ‘useless organiser’, and he has even bigger problems ahead; if the allegations made against him recently, are true.

With notable exceptions, why do those whom are thrown out of the party turn around and wail about how great they were? If this is the case – why haven’t you all banded together and created a purist nationalist party driven by legions of expelled super-activists? Those ex-activists that I have had the displeasure to run into were largely illiterate, an embarrassment to themselves and the BNP. They are oblivious to how much of a joke they really are, when you have no self-respect to begin with, you never know that you lack it. I suppose we can’t expect those whom are devoid of self-respect, to bestow respect on others.

A few years ago, during the ‘December rebellion’ I tried to stay impartial, as to get a clear view of the situation, and as I had friends on both sides. In fact it may surprise SOME people that I am STILL friends with Colin Auty.

Nothing to do with what he or I politically believe, but the fact that we actually get on with each other.

Anyway one thing that stood out during the conflict to me was that they (the said rebels) posted a video of Mark Collett getting threatened by some Nutzis, and clearly in distress. Now whether you disagree with someone, or if you don’t even like them, showing a video like that in a public place not only made me cringe but destroyed any respectability to their cause.

I am glad it did.

Whilst surfing the net I came across this old article.

Take special note of the bits I have highlighted.

Membership List Leak – A Response

It is unfortunate that a response has to be made regarding the disgusting accusations emanating from the lie filled mouth of Nick Griffin, yet in order to set the record straight we feel that a response is indeed necessary.

Firstly we would like to point out that the publication of the BNP membership list is a treacherous act which will have repercussions for the entire Party and nationalism in general. Whoever has done this should be utterly ashamed of their spiteful actions. Whatever the reasons for the publication of the list, ordinary BNP members should not have to suffer because of the crass incompetence, flawed personality and arrogance of the Party Leader.

The BNP website carries an “urgent update” from the BNP leader, Nick Griffin. This update blatantly accuses those involved in the December 2007 dispute, which had its source concern expressed by several leading Party members and senior officials over the disgraceful protection by the Chairman of two individuals who had brought and continue to bring the Party into disrepute and heap embarrassment through their incompetence, immaturity and selfish behaviour. Griffin, a man who like so many contemptible politicians can be detected lying when his mouth open’s hardly conceals his ill-founded and thoroughly false suspicions that Kenny Smith, the previous Head of Administration, of being responsible for the publication. This is a disgrace and a downright lie. None of the six people involved in the April 2007 court case want to see the BNP suffer at all. Moreover, they certainly do not want to see the thoroughly decent members and activists suffer at the hands of filthy communist scum. Seeing Nick Griffin get his deserved comeuppance is one thing, harming the Party is completely different. Neither Kenny Smith, nor any of the other co-defendants who Griffin and Darby took to court leaked/published the database.

Nick Griffin has clearly landed himself in very hot water by alleging that the publication of the list proves ‘Contempt of Court’. He says that the web host’s legal department has been contacted by the BNP and that the BNP are liaising with their solicitors about how to use this against the six defendants in the ongoing court action.
We would dearly like to see the BNP find out who did this and we would like to see them brought to book. When the real culprit is found we will be expecting a full public apology from Griffin, with damages for the smearing of our names.

In reality, the publication of the membership lists simply shows the contempt in which Griffin holds the BNP membership. By allowing gross inefficiencies in BNP departments (which was the main reason behind the December crisis whereby sickened national officials could not take any more incompetence from two departments and were sacked for speaking out) Griffin is to blame. The fact that up to a dozen (possibly more?) people may have, or have had a full database is bad enough when the database is the BNP’s prize asset. However, the real problem is that Nick Griffin has such a terrible record for falling out with senior BNP officials who criticise him in any way that the list of his enemies is seemingly endless. Because of the way in which Griffin treats those who have given their all for the BNP, he creates a rod for his own back in that some people (in this case misguidedly) may do things which damage the BNP in an attempt to attack Griffin himself.

Further, the rather arrogant way in which the BNP web team and Griffin himself dismiss the membership leak as ‘a publicity bonus’ is truly shocking when you consider that many members and activists with a sensitive job have now been exposed to violent communist bully boys and their backers at Searchlight and UAF. We have already had calls from people who have had such threatening calls and our sympathies go out to them. For Griffin to brush this off, and to wrongly claim that ‘former employees’ were to blame is beneath contempt. Griffin has once again shown just how little he really thinks of the everyday BNP member.

We suggest that the Party Chairman:

1.) Immediately apologises to the six court defendants (who have never been found guilty of anything despite the malicious Griffin/Darby prosecution) and to Kenny Smith in particular.

2.) Actually contacts Dyfed-Powys Police rather than just pretending so, in order to start the ball rolling as to who did actually leak the list.

3.) Actually contacts the web host’s legal department and gets them to shut down the offending websites.

4.) Starts to act in the interests of the members and not operate once more in a zone of self-survival which leads to utter contempt for the feelings of the average BNP member.

Just a little food for thought on how close we nearly came to bowing to the wishes of these people. Let’s make sure we’re not naive enough to let it happen again.

By Joey Smith

We know that trade unions are often mobilised to interfere in our democracy, particularly when the BNP is standing. So it comes as no surprise that a local Unison member in Barking and Dagenham is going to be fighting the BNP there.

You will no doubt have some idea of what the virulently anti-BNP Unison gets up to. Supposedly, allowing hope not hate, searchlies et al, free use of their call-centre facilities. One member allegedly traced nuisance phone calls back to a Unison facility.

Louise Couling is a lollypop woman, or crossing officer (as I imagine she likes to be called), she is also a member of the London branch of Unison and has a position on the National Executive Council (NEC).

According to Labourlist:

Louise describes herself as an ordinary working class trade unionist who fiercely represents her predominantly low-paid women members. She is also a super-proud true Brit who hates fascism.

This is normally translated as lower class, uneducated, very left-wing and thinks Fascism is anything right of themselves; which just happens to be everything when you’re that far left. Having spent some time around the Labour scene, I know what these lot are like. Usually stinking filthy, with yellow teeth, cat hair on their clothes and rather fond of the booze. That’s your average Liebore bag lady. Not to menti0n that most of them were young communists, before they learned to conceal their beliefs.

Richard is running for election to Barking & Dagenham council, instead of parliament, and should be successful, having been one of the most well-known and liked politicians in the area. If the party captures the council Richard is expected to be installed as the first BNP council leader.

This mouldy ragamuffin should offer no stiff challenge to the seasoned BNP activists of B & D, despite the plotting between Liebore and (E)UKIP.

UKIP’s London Chairman Paul Wiffen took great delight in telling me that I was lying about everything in the last article, I must have just made it all up off the top of my head.

They have actually dumped poor Winston Mckenzie and gone for the rabid gay-hater, failed footballer, failed jockey, one-time chef and boxing manager Frank Maloney. Nobody knew about this development, apart from very few of the mugs in (E)UKIP.

Maloney stood in the 2004 London mayoralty election, securing 6.19% of the vote and fourth place. During this very campaign, he refused to canvass Camden because there were ‘too many gays’.

The ponces of the UKIP London hierarchy probably think Maloney’s non-PC outbursts will endear him to the indigenous folks of Barking – the ones that haven’t been ethnically cleansed, yet. We’ll see, maybe Wiffen can make a documentary about it.

We hope he is ready to take on the BNP-Machine, after all, it was only two months ago that he suffered a heart attack. No Mercy, prepare to be crushed, Maloney.

(Gay BNP supporters are urged to participate in the Barking Campaign)

UKIP insiders are claiming that political chameleon Winston Mckenzie is putting himself forward as the candidate to take on Nick Griffin for the Barking parliamentary seat.

The former boxer, landlord and hairdresser who has been a member of Labour, Liberal Democrats, UKIP, Veritas, Conservatives and founder of the now defunct Unity Party is up against Paul Wiffen for the nomination, UKIP’s London Chairman.

UKIP members have asked why the party is standing against another EU withdrawalist in a seat they have little chance of winning. However, it was revealed that UKIP has a history of working with the local Labour party to split the BNP’s vote. Labour activists were even used to deliver UKIP literature, and the party put up 12 candidates specifically in the Barking and Dagenham wards contested by the BNP in 2006.

The plot thickens, de-facto leader of UKIP’s Barking and Dagenham branch is Kenny Smith, whose brother just happens to to be Liam Smith, the boss of the local Labour group and River Ward councillor.

Given the nature of UKIP’s duplicity it would not be surprising if the BNP stood a candidate against Nigel Farage, who plans to oust the speaker of the house of commons John Bercow in Buckingham. This would seriously lengthen the odds of the contest returning UKIP’s first MP.

Mckenzie is a prize fool, but he is also Black. UKIP will trade on his ethnicity, playing up the contest as some sort of battle between the lovely ethnic minority vs the evil BNP leader whom wants to send him home to Jamaica. The press will love it.

Credit where it is due, Mckenzie was one of the very few London Mayoralty candidates that didn’t walk off the stage when Richard Barnbrook made his victory speech.

After the Spanish Nationalist Conference attended by Nick Griffin was attacked by the fascist admirers of Francisco Franco, the EDL has been on the offensive. Take a look at this charming little message, below.

“edl (EDL), mickey mouse? You mugs, where (we’re) not state-funded or even state-run, you thick, dole dossing, idiots , not one of you job less (Jobless) bums know the script , WE ARE ENGLAND, WE ARE THE SAVIOUR, and (if) any of you mugs keep calling us a little outfit…

You‘ll see on yer (your) next demo, when we turn up and turn you lot out !!!! And make it an EDL demo , you forget we‘re  getting bigger than you and it (has only) been 3 months !!!!”

(The parts in red are my corrections, it’s almost unreadable without it.)

Message received from an official English Defence League email address.

Let us break down this little comment, and forget that it represents a sad barometer of the British education system.

A state-run organisation doesn’t necessarily have somebody right at the top, actually running the day-to-day business of the organisation. The fact that they have been given free-rein to rampage around some of Britain’s largest cities is proof enough for some, that something isn’t quite right here, and that it may indicate state-manipulation. Only this weekend they uncovered a UAF plant within their ranks, which caused considerable uproar amongst the EDL Facebook community.

Again, with state-funding, you can’t seriously believe the state will send a nice little bundle of notes inside an envelope with HM Crown MI5 emblazoned across the front. Field Operatives are given an allowance with which they make donations to organisations. This is almost impossible to guard against when using a third-party online payment processor, such as paypal, which is the service that the EDL use.

Yes, we’re all knuckle-dragging thugs. All on benefits. Next.

The sight of 70-100 EDL lads getting chased out of London by 1,000 enrichers hardly inspires me to confirm, that, you are indeed, the White Knight we’ve all been waiting for. You are a growing – but still small – organisation. As are the BNP, whose membership should exceed 15,000 this coming January, coupled with our supporters, silent or otherwise, we’re looking at twice that figure as a total. Suggestions that you’re anywhere near approaching our size are well off the mark.

I can assure you that you won’t be seeing us (as the BNP) on your next demo, we don’t do street marching. You have us confused with the various hardline nationalist groups that have attached themselves to your cause. The same people that you surrounded and thrashed a few months ago.

One last thing, I notice your site offers a uniform for purchase – that in itself is of questionable legality – which suggests that you personalise your shirt with the name of your Town/City. Why not go the whole hog and have your name,address and shoe size embroidered onto the shirt. Saves police time when identifying you from the footage, doesn’t it?

Having said all this, I wouldn’t be ungrateful if you did manage to run the UAF off the streets.