The British Nationalist

Over the past few weeks there has been a sharp increase in the amount of anti-BNP agitators. They’ve tried to embed themselves into the social network, the chat rooms and the blogs – even creating a few new blogs.

With this in mind, it was decided to resurrect the old site, but not running at the same level as the previous ‘magazine’ site. Hence the more minimal styling. Some of you will be happy to hear that I managed to salvage all the author’s posts and comments, others less so.

In the coming weeks the British National Party membership will be making the biggest decision ever asked of them. Our enemies know this, they hope that by some interference they can drive a wedge into the membership, causing splits or factions.

The newest little addition to the anti-BNP blog army is claiming that it represents 70+ ex-BNP members. However, the description gives the game away:

“A GROWING GROUP OF EX PARTY MEMBERS TO EXPOSE THE HIDDEN AGENDA OF THIS VICIOUS PARTY TO MEMBERS OF THE VOTING PUBLIC AND TO CURRENT UNSUSPECTING MEMBERS WHO ARE BEING BRAINWASHED.

ANY EX MEMBERS WHO HAVE TRUE EVENTS AND STORIES TO TELL THEN PLEASE GET IN TOUCH.”

Now, the majority of ex-members have left because they believe the party has moved away from its original ideology. Some believe the party isn’t ‘vicious’ enough, they certainly don’t think it has grown too aggressive for them since Nick Griffin took over in 1999. So, who else thinks the party is ‘vicious’, couldn’t be our anti-fascist pals, could it?

Secondly, the blog author is claiming that they have raised £4,000 to stand independent candidates against BNP parliamentary candidates. The reasoning behind the move raises further questions about those running the blog, and their real agenda:

“The only reason we will do this is to strategically split the votes and Help to lose the BNP their deposits , We have no political agenda other than to Protect the General public from these Crooks whom are just wanting to bleed the country dry.”

Right, because if you wanted to raid the country’s bare coffers you would pick a small, fringe nationalist party as a vehicle to do it, wouldn’t you? Nonsense. And nonsense is what constitutes the vast majority of the postings on the site. The facts can be found if only you search.

The final piece of evidence offered up should leave you in no doubt as to the nature of the people behind it. Every post labels a senior activist or official as a ‘racist’, including Martin Wingfield, Michael Elliot, Clive Jefferson, and Eddy Butler.

There is a twist – the site claims to be run by our pals from the now defunct BNP reform group. The site author considers the National Front as a ‘viable alternative’ to the BNP, yet perceives no irony in labelling BNP folk as racist, whilst attempting to reconstruct a racial-nationalist party. Perhaps this development lends weight to those who claimed that the reformists weren’t interested in politics, merely interested in bringing the BNP down. If this isn’t the case, you have to ask why they haven’t simply taken their skills to the National Front and let us get on with our political activities.

You can view the pitiful blog here. Let them know what you think of their lies and schemes.

—————————————————————————–

Dreaming: Chris Jackson

I notice that the editor of the Bedfordshire Beacon blog is angry about my little article on the BNP Reform Group. He attempts to counter with his own article entitled ‘In defence of Truth‘. Apparently, I am ‘misinformed’, the meeting wasn’t called by the Sterling Trust to avoid it being labelled as an official BNP meeting, YEAH RIGHT. Judging by who turned up it could have been described as a BNP meeting, the editor knows this, as he attended (what a surprise).

The gloves are off.

“The conclusion was not that Chris Jackson was no match for Nick Griffin. The fact is there was no conclusion at all other than a leadership challenge needed to be mounted.”

They concluded that mounting a challenge to Nick Griffin would end in failure, as explained in my original article, which contained a quotation from their own report. They came to this conclusion because 95% of the membership don’t even know who the hell he is, he is not media savvy (Judging by the company he keeps, quite possibly the worst person any nationalist could be associated with) he doesn’t seem to be able to talk to the crowd without injecting racial epithets into his speeches. I will never trust a man whose website carries links to sites like Lancaster Unity, there is never any excuse for promoting anti-nationalist sites.

“There was no evidence, nor mention of siphoning off of funds from branches for any other party. What was said was any monies collected on behalf of the BNP must go to the BNP. It is both a moral and legal requirement.”

So the funds that would have normally ended up in the branch coffers end up with the Sterling Work Trust, people only have so much money to donate. This is forcing them to choose between the BNP or funding a new party whilst still being activists/supporters of the former.

“What was said was, any member who acts alone or shows support for the challenge is likely to be ejected from the party.

As for virtually no support. I am not privy to how many members support Mr. Jackson but no-one at the meeting wanted to sabotage the BNP.”

As stated above, they are not going to challenge Nick Griffin, instead, they have come up with a 6 point plan. They are asking people to retain their membership of the BNP and work from the inside to gather more supporters, no doubt, their intention is to take over whole BNP branches. Where is his support? Apart from dinosaur nationalists, disgraced ex-members, malcontents, weirdos, Nutzis and cranks?

“There were current members and ex-members at the meeting. There were no representatives of anti-nationalist groups and certainly no “nutzis.”

Vetted everyone, did you? We all know that the Nutzis who were purged from the party over the last 10 years have a serious issue with Mr Griffin, the same old faces pop up every time there is a leadership challenge. This hatred-fuelled reckless crusade could topple not only the leader, but the whole party.

“When articles are written in this manner, and I don’t seek to fallout with fellow bloggers, they only serve the purpose of re-enforcing the view that the BNP is a dictatorial unsavoury party. It is not only the terrorist group the UAF or the dysfunctional Unity loons that read these sites. They are browsed through by news writers, political boggers [sic] and pundits.”

Had you enabled your comments section I wouldn’t need to put this into an article. I wouldn’t need to comment at all if the future of the BNP wasn’t threatened by halfwits spitting their dummies out because they want to be the big daddy. When the time comes for Nick Griffin to stand down, I will only support the candidate that is on a par, or better than him. I don’t see the wisdom in downgrading our leader.

The organisational structure of the BNP is designed to scupper splitting, infiltration and other malign forces. It cannot be run like the other parties because the establishment would exploit a democratic internal mechanism to place their own people in positions of power within the party. This has happened in the past, we’ve learned from it, and we are now stable at the top.

They should all go and form their own party, although it would probably fall apart within a year, ten Fuhrers all vying for control.

P.S Reprobate –  To disapprove of; condemn. I think that fits

P.S.S I’m willing to come on to your radio show to discuss this