The British Nationalist

It has been revealed that Communist protesters with the Unite Against Fascism (UAF) group have cost the taxpayer £143,000.

This figure includes thousands of extra police at a cost of £109,000 and a further £13,000 in overtime, and £21,000 on road closures, erecting barriers and a helicopter.

Police were drafted in after the communists threatened to lay siege to the BBC’s headquarters in West London on the night that BNP leader Nick Griffin, took party in Question Time, the BBC’s premier politics show.

500 of the violent far-left activists surrounded the BBC building, and at one point managed to break through the police line and enter the building. They were only stopped when the BBC’s security staff spotted them gathering outside the studio where Question Time is filmed.

Local Labour MP Andy Slaughter, said that the BBC should cover the cost of the policing. Therefore, spreading the cost across all contributors of the TV licence-fee tax, and not leaving the bill with the Metropolitan Police.

It is believed that the various anti-democracy groups – such as the UAF – have cost the Taxpayer around £1 million this year, in police protection costs. This figure includes the monstrous £500,000 spent protecting women and children at the BNP’s family festival.

Well, needless to say Nick Griffin’s appearance on Question Time could have gone a lot better.

It cannot be said that the bullying manner of the other panellists coupled with the carefully chosen, hostile audience was unexpected. Never has there been such an episode of QT. Never has any other panellist been ganged up on with such hatred and vehemence. To be clear, I wholly commend Mr Griffin for his efforts given the way in which the circumstances were stacked against him, though let’s for a moment evaluate his performance as a whole.

Mr Griffin seemed to be placing far too much emphasis on attempting to play the nice, polite chap, the reasonable guy. Let’s make it clear now; there is no room for these characteristics in the world of politics, particularly at a time when the Nation is looking for strength in a leader and Griffin showed himself to appear weaker than even Mr Brown!

Admittedly this was largely due to constant interruption on the side of both the panellists and the audience (with, of course, no help from the host) as well as attempts made by Dimbleby and Straw alike to entrap Mr Griffin when it came to the issue regarding an explanation into his previous thoughts concerning matters such as the holocaust; matters which Straw and Dimbleby know are sensitive areas whereby speaking of them, if misinterpreted, could result in prosecution thanks to oppressive laws against freedom of speech put forward by the cretinous elite within the European Union.

However, Mr Griffin missed an excellent opportunity to explain exactly this, instead stumbling over his words and at times coming across rather incoherent.

One point I must touch upon is the way in which Mr Griffin handled Bonnie Greer’s condescending and, quite franky, rude attitude towards the latter part of the show.

Greer was heard to mock Mr Griffin’s 2.2 Cambridge degree moments before making a wholly invalid point regarding her fantasy of a multicultural Roman Britain, as if  by doing so her argument would gain more credibility. Now, Nick Griffin’s overly strained attempt at laughing this off could be seen as little more than pandering to an ethnic.
Heaven forbid he should sharply and concisely put her in her place in the same manner he shot down Jack Straw after his rant about colour/racism being a key part of BNP ideology, whereby Nick quite succinctly put it as, “Skin colour’s irrelevant, Jack.”

Ideally he should’ve begun to differentiate between race and ethnicity in an attempt to educate those who may not be aware of the fact that the British National Party is ideologically ethno-Nationalist, not racialist, though never mind.

Mr Griffin did manage to successfully expose the panel’s utter disregard for the existence of the English ethnic group, though as aforementioned, more effort should have been placed on defining ethnicity in comparison to race or civic British identity.

On the whole it was a poor performance from all sides (albeit one amusing positive is that Ms Warsi at times seemed more keen to attack Labour minister Jack Straw than Mr Griffin), though the panel failed in adequately countering any points Mr Griffin put forward (when able) even if Mr Griffin, in turn, was unable to successfully do the same.

By Jersey Royal

Well, anybody who thought that Question Time would be a stroll in the park for Nick Griffin MEP, had a rude awakening last night. Most Nationalists knew that the opposition politicos would be out to destroy Nick, but we didn’t know by which tactic the BBC would facilitate this. To be fair the BBC has played a blinder.

After sustaining very harsh attacks on their judgement from across the political spectrum we imagined that David Dimbleby would be under orders to scupper Nick at every turn, but it was not the other panellists who scored the hits, but the audience themselves. This is a clever move by the BBC because it absolves them of being accused of allowing the panellists to turn it into a witch-hunt. It allows the BBC to say ‘hey, look, we gave Mr Griffin a platform and the British public shot him down, that’s democracy’.

The audience itself appeared to be heavily composed of ethnic minorities, certainly an over-representation not reflecting the ethnic demographic of the UK, I suspect the BBC would say that it reflects the area it was filmed in (West London) and they’d probably be right.

At 20 minutes into the programme Nick looked shaken, he had just been attacked by the audience, host and panellists for a sustained period. This appears to have been the producers formula for the evening – smash him in the first 20 minutes, then 20 minutes recovery and finish him with the last 20; it is similar to a play-list selection for live rock bands, a blazing beginning, slower middle building up to a fast and furious ending. Only it didn’t quite work out, Nick had weathered the verbal storm of the first 20 and appeared to grow in confidence as the programme went on, contrary to Sky News he did land a few good hits.

Jack straw answered the first question with the logical fallacy of comparing the British National Party (BNP) to the 20 century Fascist regimes of Italy and Germany, of course, the dullards in the audience clapped like stupid seals. Nick countered with a great comment about Straw being the son of a coward – as his father was imprisoned for refusing to go to war, and therefore, Straw has no right to trade on the bravery of British troops – this enraged the seal-people, but Straw had no come back.

Baroness Warsi pretty much attacked everyone and refused to make clear her stance on civil partnerships, she also claimed that there ‘is no such thing as a bogus asylum seeker’, there is, as the vast majority of them are economic migrants.

Chris Huhne just sat there mumbling, what is the point of the Liberal Democrats? What is the point of Huhne? He tried desperately to make out that the Lib-Dems would be tougher on immigration, which Nick called him up on.

Bonnie Greer had her back turned towards Nick throughout the show, mocked his degree and generally tried to p0rtray herself as smart (lol). However, she left herself open when attempting to assign the Neanderthals as the indigenous population, they are a different species! It’s like saying that Monkeys were in Africa before Humans so Africans are not indigenous to Africa. Nick should have reminded her that the Neanderthals were wiped out by immigration, their birthrate was 0.1% below the rate at which they could have sustained their species, and competition from the immigrant Cro-Magnons sent their species over the edge.

Dimbleby had a few sly little digs, nothing of note.

I think some of us are being a little too critical of the performance, this is a new platform for Nick and it couldn’t have been easy being surrounded by a hostile audience and panel. He is ten times the man of Straw & Hunhe, those cretins would refuse to appear had the roles been reversed. The neutrals I have spoken to have all said that the panel was trying too hard, that it looked like a setup, and that is exactly the portrayal the producers wanted to avoid.

This was the establishment’s chance to bury Nick Griffin for good, in front of a massive home audience, and they failed.

The leftist newspapers and websites have been awash with support for Peter Hain’s little letters that demand that the BBC renege on their agreement, the Director-General rejected his anti-democratic demands, so he went cap in hand to the BBC trust. He hopes the trust will override the Director and tear up Mr Griffin’s invitation, however, the trust normally reviews the decision to air programmes after they go out, and not before. It’s likely that his last-ditch effort will fail.

Over on the Lancaster Unity blog they were becoming sexually excited about one of the latest Chairman’s update emails, which  - according to leftists – libels Hain. Something to do with branding him a bank robber, when Hain was cleared of any wrongdoing.

The suspicious part of this little tale is that Hain seems reluctant to get the solicitors involved.  Hain said last night: “What they said about me is libellous and I know a lot of campaigners want to drain the BNP’s finances with legal action.

“But I have got more important things on my mind at the moment.”

More important than trying to derail the BNP locomotive? I very much doubt that.

There is speculation that Hain doesn’t fancy a legal wrangle because it would attract the wrong sort of attention onto himself and his activities. Hain isn’t stupid, despite what we would like to think you don’t get to the front bench without having some political nous.

The left suspects that Hain doesn’t want details of his former case aired just before a general election, despite being exonerated by a criminal court he would still be required to give evidence in his defence in a civil court to prove that Libel had been committed.

Others believe that the BNP is deliberately being given a ’soft-ride’, but that Hain isn’t prepared to go along with their game. All I want to know is now that South Africa is under Black governance why hasn’t Hain returned to the Marxist utopia that he promoted for so long? And secondly, why Neath? It’s not a very ‘enriched’ area, it must be hell living amongst a sea of hideously white faces.

Since announcing that the leader of the British National Party (BNP) Nick Griffin will appear on Question Time – their flagship politics show – the publicly funded BBC has come under sustained attack – from all those whom would normally reserve their venom for the BNP;

1.) Labour fuhrer Gordon Brown is said to have been ‘furious’, as calls went back and forth from No.10 to the Director-General’s office. The BBC’s Royal Charter is its constitution, it guarantees the independence of the corporation, section 6.1 states: ‘The BBC shall be independent in all matters concerning the content of its output, the times and manner in which this is supplied, and in the management of its affairs.’ Yet Labour’s Alan Johnson appeared on the latest episode of Question time and proceeded to repeat over and over again that the BNP is illegal because of the constitution, he did this because he knows that section 6.1 is proceeded by a large ‘BUT’ in section 6.2, the independence of the BBC is subject to any provision ‘made by law’. Luckily for us the court hasn’t yet ruled that we’re breaking the law, if we fought and lost this case before the next general election the BBC would be under no obligation to air our broadcasts on any of its services.

The BBC’s charter is next due for reformation on the 31st of December 2016, we shouldn’t be surprised if the government tries to amend the constitution to limit party political broadcasts to parties that have representation in parliament.

2.) Journalists from The Guardian – no surprise there, The Independent and Telegraph queued up to ‘blast’ the BBC’s decision. Who cares? Never before have the public had so much access to information at the source, via the Internet. The power newspapers wield is seriously diminished. Who cares what a rich outraged upper-middle class columnist has to say, certainly nothing of any worth on Nationalism.

3.) The left-fascists. As the anti-democratic ‘no-platform’ policy was destroyed in one fell swoop by the BBC the collective hard-left were seething, ‘those fascist-loving f*****s at the BBC will let Griffin go unchallenged, more votes for the BNP and acceptance into the mainstream! And now we hear they’re going to vet the audience for anti-fascists, this programme cannot be allowed to go ahead.’ I’m sure you won’t have missed the irony, censorship of the press and political opponents is a tactic of fascism. Having failed to threaten the BBC into submission the left-fascists are taking ‘direct-action’ in the attempt to silence Nick Griffin – a democratically elected representative. The breathtaking audacity to appoint themselves as the censors of free-speech is matched only by their arrogant contempt for the average British voter, if the BNP is full of nonsense as they say, then surely what we have to say will sink without a trace. No, the left-fascists know that what we have to say is based on common sense, it is precisely because they fear our words will carry weight with the British public that they want us silenced.

Finally the BBC is doing its job, with growing dissent over the licence-fee it should hardly be surprising that the corporation is starting to reach out -via the BNP – to Britain’s most forsaken community; the working class indigenous population. The question is do you trust them? After all the years of virulently anti-BNP reporting, stitch-up jobs and their aggressive multicultural agenda. Roll on Thursday 22nd.

In a recent online edition of News Shopper, Gerry Gable was quoted saying that the British National Party’s election strategy has “Shades of Nazi Germany.”

GERRY Gable, the publisher of anti-fascist magazine Searchlight, says the BNP’s “bullying tactics” had “shades of Nazi Germany”.

He said: “The BNP is very good at organising people to email local newspapers in protest, but those who do email are largely not from the area.

“The first thing they want to do is silence the media.”
———————–

Just a minute! Firstly, It is the UAF with their Muslim attack dogs that bully BNP supporters and activists only when they have superior numbers, isn’t that a hallmark of  bullying? Secondly, 90%+ of the communist street army are non-residents of the areas they invade, in fact, they’ve been known to bus them into London from as far away as Glasgow. Thirdly, the anti-democracy blogs organise ‘the troops’ to threaten and abuse the owners of hotels and pubs where the BNP is planning on holding a meeting. And finally, it isn’t the BNP that is planning on surrounding the BBC’s studios because they don’t want them to abide by their charter, who wants to silence the media? It’s not us.

So how would he describe the actions of UAF ,AntiFa and other fascist style left wing groups who also use similar tactics to silence those of us who seek to speak out against what we see as an attack on our liberty.
When the BNP membership was leaked on-line various Newspapers were quick off of the mark to print the list in their pages, some left wing groups exhorted their members to email, phone and otherwise harass people whose names appeared on the list, not content with just launching such attacks against the persons involved some even contacted the employers,neighbours and family members of those on the list.

Most trades unions bar people who belong to the BNP, some professions are denied to them, they are attempting to bar those in the teaching profession from being allowed to teach, but assert it is ok for children to be taught by rabid Communist and Islamic adherents.

Gerry Gable writing in ‘ The Independent‘ on Thursday 11th June 2009 states:
“The template for tackling and defeating the BNP is in place – at its base is a dynamic, broad-based coalition put together by Searchlight. A new politics of “Hope not Hate” has been created that reaches outside the Westminster beltway via unions, churches, voluntary groups, students and local political parties.
We will be confronting the BNP in every neighbourhood, on every estate and every street between now and the next critical showdown, the general election, which is less than 12 months away.

Nick Griffin has had his day. Now it’s our turn.”

You’re kidding no one Gable, you had your day back in the 60’s, and you failed to get even 5% of the vote when you stood as a Communist Party candidate in 1962. The heyday of the left is long gone, it’s about time you joined it in the wilderness.

by Alley Cat

African-American playwright and critic Bonnie Greer has been chosen to face BNP leader Nick Griffin on the October 22nd edition of the BBC’s Question Time politics show.

Police fear high costs could be incurred by the anti-democratic activities of  Unite Against Fascism (UAF), who have promised to mobilise ‘thousands’ of students to protest outside the West London studios where the episode will be filmed. The BBC has refused to use licence fee contributions to pay for the policing.

Unite Against Fascism explained that if thousands of protesters turned up there were plans to blockade the BBC building. A rally is also planned for the night before the event in Central London. Anti-fascists plan to leaflet BBC workers on the day itself, as they arrive at the White City building in the morning, urging them to stop work for the day in protest.

Greer, 60, will be joined on the panel by Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, Chris Huhne, the Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, and a Conservative politician whose name has not yet been confirmed, but rumours circulating suggest that Shadow Foreign Secretary William Hague is a favoured candidate.

BNP supporters suspected that the non-politico spot would be filled by an ethnic-minority in an attempt to generate discomfort for Mr. Griffin MEP. It appears that Greer has been selected because she is a successful Black lady, but commentators fear her American accent could reinforce her status as an immigrant in the eyes of the viewership.

One self-described ‘anti-fascist’ said: “I’m not sure this is a good move, she’s a softly spoken woman, but Griffin will be out to trip her up. Does she have the bottle to beat Griffin? I just don’t think she does.”

Greer was involved in the Resistance and Remembrance campaign - commemorating the bicentenary of the abolition of Slavery - which was well received by the guilt-ridden white liberal elite.

Members of the anti-democratic organisation, Unite Against Fascism (UAF), have revealed plans to sabotage the filming of an episode of Question Time, the BBC’s flagship politics show.

Responding to the news that Jack Straw will be included on a panel with Nick Griffin, British National Party Chairman and MEP,  members of the militant wing of the Socialist Workers Party are planning to intimidate BBC lighting technicians, camera crews,  and production personnel. This is their plan B should they fail in the attempt to prevent Mr Griffin from entering the studios.

The free-speech deniers have used similar tactics when attempting to subvert the democratic process of elections in the United Kingdom, in the past they have attempted to recruit union members to bully postmen into refusing to deliver BNP literature, with limited success.

One particularly rabid UAF socialist, said: “We will be targeting BBC staff involved in the filming of QT (Question Time), if we can’t stop Griffin getting into the building then we WILL stop it being filmed and broadcast. THE BNP MUST BE DENIED THE OXYGEN OF PUBLICITY. NO PLATFORM!”

The Tories have yet to name their representative in what will be the most viewed episode of the series.

I have every confidence in the professionalism of the BBC’s technical staff, and their ability to shrug off threats by the fascist thugs of the UAF.

Just as we suspected, anti-democracy group Unite Against Fascism (UAF) are to protest outside the BBC studios where Nick Griffin MEP will appear on Question Time, the BBC’s flagship political show.

The episode is expected to filmed in either Manchester, or London. Both Cities are fertile ground for the scare-mongering and black propaganda that the UAF is partial to, but filming in Manchester would lend credence to the BBC’s decision to invite the BNP because it is situated within Nick Griffin’s North West constituency.

Despite some leftists urging caution over any attempt to disrupt the filming, UAF spokesman Weyman Bennett has said that his rabble will protest, he said: “Why is the BBC so willing to grant airtime to the racist and fascist British National Party? In the past couple of months barely a week has gone by without the BBC extending an invitation to these noxious bigots.”

It’s called democracy, the BNP has passed the threshold set by the BBC and attained national office, the BBC is bound by its charter to be politically impartial, although Bennett uses the ridiculous argument that the BNP is not a legitimate party and so should not be accorded the same treatment as the other political parties.

Forgive me, but I don’t think the UAF contests elections? The organisation doesn’t participate in the democratic system at all (except to subvert it), it would rather whip up racial tensions in areas with large Muslim populations and try to harness the resultant violence for its own schemes. Namely; control of the streets, isn’t that a major theme of fascism? Oh dear.

Bennett goes on to demand that Black people should apply to be in the audience, and attend the protest. Even ‘The Voice’ – a website for the Black community – wanted to laugh at that. He just doesn’t get it.

The UAF is quickly smearing itself when all their recent protests descend into full scale riots, their tenuous alliance with young aggressive male Muslims is not good publicity. People who had never heard of the organisation now speak of them in a manner they deserve: “The UAF seem to be more dangerous and fascist than any other group in Britain,” said one commentator. I agree.

The Times has revealed that the leader of the British National Party (BNP), Nick Griffin, will appear on the BBC’s flagship politics show – Question Time. The BNP has long called for a slot alongside other panelists, but up until now those requests have been largely ignored by the BBC.

As you can expect, the move has angered the ruling Labour party, most of whom are scared witless at the prospect of a BNP breakthrough in Labour strongholds come election time next year. Tory and Lib Dem panelists have confirmed that they will appear with the BNP to ‘confront our policies’.

In fact, Labour are so angry that they have threatened to boycott the whole new series of Question Time.

“If labour refuse to sit on the same platform then they are displaying the worst form of fascism, the suppression of free speech,” said one commentator.

He added: “I do not believe the BNP is a very racist party. They are not the national front or the Nazi party.
It is crazy that some jobs are banned to members of the BNP, who represent a significant and growing sector of the population. UKIP need more opportunities to appear as well. How about appearances in proportion to the European Election results?”

Nick Griffin MEP is expected to appear some time in October. The choice of opposition panelists will be very interesting, will they opt for ‘intellectual’ heavyweights, or prominent ethnic minorities, in an attempt to wrong foot the Chairman?

Either way, I believe the BBC has made the right decision in allowing airtime to the UK’s fastest growing political party. The question remains –  has this come about as the result of our intention to alter our constitution?  It certainly hasn’t gone unnoticed in the corridors of power.