The British Nationalist

If you look at the linked pie chart of UK expenditure, you will see that by far the largest slice of overall spending is devoted to “Social Protection”, at 169 billion pounds or 27% of total spending. This is on top of “Personal Social Services” spending of 27 billion pounds.

So, what is this vague cover-all term “Social Protection”? What does it mean?

A little research reveals that the main focus of this expensive targeting is “maternity”, “childbirth”, “early years” and “young adulthood”. All very well and good and beneficial. But just who are the main recipients of all this money?

When you factor in the statistics from the Office for National Statistics which reveal that Britain’s highest birth rates are in the Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities, that the birth rate among women born in Pakistan but living in the UK is three times higher than that among British-born women – and that Mohammed has overtaken Jack as Britain’s most popular name for baby boys -you will begin to realise where most of this sizeable tranche of expenditure ends up.

Yes, all that money is for the vastly increasing immigrant baby boomers, more than for health, education, transport or housing (of which they get their share as well).

And look at the disproportionately tiny amount spent on defence. If Labour had not inflicted this situation on us, we would have had all that money available to spend on our aging infrastructure for use by us British Brits. Instead of which, it’s all being wasted on people who shouldn’t be here anyway.

Vote BNP and redress the balance in our favour.

File: UK Expenditure - http://tinyurl.com/58d9rh

By Sheriff of Nottingham

In reality, the term ‘Social Protection’ means voter base protection. Labour are merely utilising and encouraging the benefits culture to keep themselves in power. As revealed last week, the areas with the highest percentages of benefits claimants are Labour territory. It goes some way to explaining the ties to the ‘benevolent’ state that the Labour party has cast upon the most disadvantaged, for their own electoral gain. For example, Glasgow North East. -Ed

The whole by-election was a bit of a farce. The Labour candidate proudly mooted as the only local candidate cast his vote by postal ballot and is actually registered to vote in London, his father being the Willie Bains registered in Glasgow. There is a police investigation ongoing into several cases of “personation” and the massive increase in postal votes assigned to Labour just a day or two before the election is also a matter for concern, as raised by the Spectator. In this regard one should remember the trouble in Glenrothes with regard to the registration books which is still unresolved.

Apparently, the BNP was refused a recount with regard to the 20 votes by which they failed to retain their deposit. If so, I would like to know on what grounds. The returning officer stated that he would allow a recount of the 1st and 2nd placed party’s ballots, but not the 3rd and 4th placed parties. The Conservative’s and the BNP’s respectively.

Despite all the above question marks and again despite media onslaughts, biased reporting, comics like the Lizzard and religious ministers like Christopher Rowe forbidding his parishioners from voting for the BNP, this was an excellent result, which obviously had the frighteners on all the other parties that took part. 74 years of Labour rule has left its mark not only on the sad demise of Glasgow North East as a provider of statistics but on the sorry mental state of the voters who can’t see the wood for the Labour moss.

“Postal voting on demand is lethal to the democratic process. Wholesale electoral fraud is both easy and profitable.”

That statement sounds like a description of Afghan electoral practices, but it was delivered by Richard Mawrey QC after an inquest into UK postal voting … History shows that Labour benefit from postal voting, notably at the comfortable Glenrothes by-election victory last year, when every indication was that the SNP would overturn the majority.

The Scotsman claims that over 6,000 people have registered for postal votes in Glasgow North East, which is 10 percent of eligible voters. (Surely not that many people can be bed ridden or in absentia, even in Glasgow North East?) … Postal voting is open to fraud and has been abused on numerous occasions by a range of campaigns. The system is shambolic and needs to be reformed to ensure that only those who are incapacitated or unable to vote on the day receive a postal ballot.” (Electoral fraud – The Spectator Blog - http://tinyurl.com/yhy2o9m )

Police investigate ballot papers at Glasgow North East by-election - http://tinyurl.com/yf6mgzu

“But the SNP has formally asked for the Electoral Commission to investigate whether Labour abused the postal vote system after 1,100 postal votes were applied for less than three days before the deadline. The applications came in so late that the SNP was unable to visit all the voters involved, before their postal votes were sent in. The SNP alleges this prevented it from getting fair access to all the voters involved.” (SNP throws in towel to Labour in Glasgow North East byelection - http://tinyurl.com/yg2a4qh )

By Sheriff of Nottingham