The British Nationalist

We all have heard and know of the tired rants and accusations of the mainstream Political Parties, the so called Liberal Elite, the Establishment and the mainstream Media – the rants and accusations that the BNP, it’s policies, members and supporters are all ‘Extremist’. Indeed, it is due to this judgment of Extremism that the BNP is deemed to be vile and odious – the reserve of skinhead knuckle dragging Nazi thugs. To prove their point on this, we saw on the Nick Griffin Question Time a concerted effort by representatives of all of these groups to ‘expose’ a supposedly extreme past of the BNP leader just to establish that their accusations were correct, when surely it would have been simpler and quicker to convince the 8 million viewers of it’s ‘extremism’ just by examining the BNP’s policies?

Why did these avowed enemies of the ‘extremist’ BNP not examine the Party Policies on a public forum, so that the ordinary voters could see for themselves how ‘extreme’ they are? Quite simple really, because not one of the BNP’s policies could remotely be described as Extreme. For any who have bothered to find out what the Party policies are, they would have been struck by the simple fact that they are not extreme in the slightest, but are in fact deeply conservative ‘common sense’ policies drafted to promote the happiness, prosperity and security of Britain and her people. What on earth could be ‘extreme’ about that? Are they not the aims of every reasonable democratic government on earth?

Before we go further, let’s take a look at the definition of the words Extremist and Extremism. Extremism is defined as a term used to describe the actions or ideologies of individuals or groups outside the perceived political center of a society; or otherwise claimed to violate common moral standards. Extremists, within a democracy, are defined as individuals or groups which advocate that democracy should be replaced with some kind of authoritarian regime or who advocates or resorts to measures or views beyond the norm, especially in politics.

So knowing what Extremism is, let’s take a quick look at some of the issues relevant to life in the UK and the BNP ‘extreme’ policies designed to deal with them.

Of course, the first policy relates to Immigration, an area of prime importance to every person living in the UK today, whether they are of indigenous descent or a recent immigrant. I am old enough to remember a pre-mass immigration Britain, and also remember the protests of the majority of Britons when faced with the beginnings of immigration from Third World countries. The Britons of those times, much like the Britons of today, didn’t want any number of immigrants from Third World countries to be allowed to come to Britain and live here, and made their feelings known loudly. The Governments of those times (Conservative and Labour), knowing full well that immigration from the Third World was unpopular, promised the people of Britain that numbers would be severely limited, and after every small wave of immigration would promise ‘these are the last to come’. We all know what happened to those promises. Now, what name would you call a government which acts against the express wishes of the people that, in a democracy, it is supposed to represent, and lies while doing so? Extremist perhaps?

Successive Labour and Conservative governments who have acted outside the perceived political centre of British society – and who violated the common moral standards of the times by acting against the very people that they were supposed to represent, and lying to them while doing so. In fact, by ignoring the wishes of the vast majority of British people, were they not acting in an authoritarian way? So, here we have already established that Labour and Conservative governments have both been extremist when in power. So now, we move to more recent times. Both of these main Parties, when in government, have continued – against the wishes of the majority of the British people – to flood Britain with immigrants from the Third World. So eager have they been to flout their duty and responsibility to the British people and democracy, they have allowed all kinds of people to come here ‘to aid the British economy’, not just the well educated and skilled immigrants looking to improve their lives through hard work and diligent living, but the millions who don’t speak English, are not well educated and have no skills, the physically sick who cannot work, the lazy who don’t want to work, and the downright criminal. So against the express wishes of the British people, who they were supposed to represent, they have imported millions of people from the Third World, to ‘aid the British economy’ all the while ignoring the fact that the vast majority of these immigrants are a drain on limited resources and vastly overload the Public Services of this country. Democracy or Extremism?

However, the most important fact is that, whether we agree with the results of the mass immigration policies of successive governments or not, Britain simply cannot afford to let all of these people live here. We currently have a population far in excess of what our land can sustain. We are currently one of the most densely populated countries on earth, our cities are full to overflowing, our roads are so congested that one small accident can grid lock traffic over a large area for hours, we have no available land for house building – unless we want Britain to be completely paved over, we cannot grow enough food for the numbers who live here, and we are causing massive environmental damage to the land. Not only all that, but our tax payer funded Public Services are overwhelmed and we do not have jobs for all of the people here. All of these problems caused by Immigration policies pursued by successive Labour and Conservative Governments acting against the express will of the British people who they are supposed to represent. Were they acting as a Democratic government would or as an Extremist Government would?

Compared to what I, and a lot of ordinary non-extremist people, consider to be the Extremist policies of past governments and this current Labour government, the BNP’s policies on immigration are the common sense solutions to the results of extremism. Whether we are indigenous Britons or immigrants or the descendants of immigrants, we cannot go on with this failed mass-immigration experiment which has clogged our country with people and has been the cause of the dire circumstances which the country is in today. Large scale unemployment, overburdened Public Services, a society broken and splintered into a myriad of different races, cultures and ethnic interests. It is not only unworkable but has cost this country far too much, and needs to be stopped before Civil Unrest breaks out. Even the most recent immigrant can have no wish to see this, but it will be the inevitable result of such extremist policies as enforced mass immigration.

The British Nationalists and their Political Party have an Immigration policy designed to start the repair of Britain, designed to bring Britain back from the brink of Civil Unrest. When was preventing war and civil war considered to be ‘extremist’? Only by those whose plans for such would be disrupted. Even recent immigrants must realise that Britain has too many people to be housed and employed – and the BNP policy is to prevent any more people coming here, people for whom there are no houses or jobs to come to. After the deluge of people has been stopped, the BNP Immigration policy is to remove all those who should not be here – the illegal immigrants and criminals. Can any reasonable person argue against that? Extremist? I rather think that it is extremist that these people have been allowed to come here and stay in the first place. The BNP will also prevent so called Asylum Seekers from crossing half of the globe to get here by the removal of all monetary and other incentives. This will prevent them from risking their lives to get to this tiny island when they could find safety from oppression in the country next door to their own, where they will be in the position to return to their own country when the situation stabilises, rather than stuck in a totally alien environment on the other side of the world. Extremist? No, simply following the guidelines set out by the United Nations on Asylum Seekers.

As for the many long term legal immigrants, their children and grandchildren, the BNP policy is to introduce a system of voluntary resettlement whereby those who do not feel that Britain is their true home but think of their ancestral homeland as their true home, can return to these countries with the help of financial incentives. Note the word ‘voluntary’. At no point is it suggested that legal immigrants or their British born descendants will be forced to leave this country against their wishes. Quite reasonable compared to the mass immigration forced on the British people against their express wishes by the extremist Labour and Conservative Parties, who now lie and accuse Nationalists of the intent to do what they have been doing for the last 50 years – forcing policies on people against their wishes. So they are not just Extremists but Hypocrites too.

The BNP, with it’s Immigration Policy, intends to restore Britain to a country for the British people, run by the British people for the benefit of the British people. Extremist? If so, then every other country in the world must be run by Extremists. After all is said and done, didn’t most immigrants to this country come here originally because they wanted to live in the Britain as it was – a Britain full of British people, run by British people for the benefit of British people? Don’t they feel betrayed by the Extremists in power who have destroyed the Britain that they came too and made it into a hell-hole of assorted and incompatible races and cultures which is anything but Britain?

The BNP’s Immigration Policy is not extreme but the Common Sense solution to decades of mass immigration forced on the British people by the extremists in the Labour and Conservative Parties.

Do I sense a shift of opinion in the mainstream media since the public backlash against the treatment of Nick Griffin on Question Time last week? Just little things, like Quentin Letts referring to ‘Mr’ Griffin in a small section of his Saturday Column in the Mail, a reference that was decidedly sympathetic to the BNP’s stance on giving sex education to Primary School children, and was quite defensive of Nick Griffin’s past in respect of the attacks on him by people who used to be Communists. Then, again in the Daily Mail, we saw Peter Oborne admitting that in the opinion of many voters, compared to Jack Straw, Nick Griffin is an honest politician.

Small things, but just a hint of empathy with the British National Party’s policies – a seismic change from the previous attitude that the Party and all of it’s policies were extremist and racist. An indication that when people actually hear what British Nationalist policies are, as in the Sex Education of Children, all but the extreme left and the so called Liberal Elite discover that those policies are not Extreme, and where relevant, not Racist.

Let’s take just a minute to examine this charge of Racism, which is aimed not just at British Nationalists, but at the British people in general. According to the dictionary, the definition of a Racist is someone who not only believes that race accounts for differences in character and ability but that a particular race is superior to others, and has the right to control other races. It does not refer to the characteristic common to all people of the world, whatever their race or culture, of preferring to associate with people who are just like themselves.

That is where the Marxists and the Liberal Elite get it all wrong. Not surprising given their inability for logical thought processes. Like the Chinese, Indians, Pakistanis, Africans and the population of the rest of the world, British Nationalists – and in general, the indigenous British people – prefer to live and associate with other indigenous Britons. We do not consider ourselves to be superior to people in the rest of the world – we just prefer to be with our own kind, and prefer our culture. Nothing racist in that. However, while the Marxists and Liberal Elite wouldn’t dream of calling the Chinese racist for preferring to live in a country populated primarily by Chinese people, they see no double standards in applying the racist term to the indigenous British people when we want the same thing.

That double standard is exposed even further when the recent history of mass immigration to this country is examined. What other ethnic group on the planet would accept such huge numbers of people from alien races and cultures arriving in their country in such a short time without a hint of the civil unrest that would explode in other nations if the same were to happen to them? What other ethnic group would, on the whole, treat such immigrants as civilly and as fairly as the British people have? What other ethnic group would willingly mix in all spheres of life with immigrants from such different racial and cultural backgrounds as the indigenous British people have? Take a look around the world, especially at the countries that immigrants to this country come from, and see if those immigrants would have mixed – socially, in business and even in marriage – with any people from different races and cultures if they had remained in their own countries. We know what the answer would be. It is only in Britain – home to the indigenous British people – that other races and cultures have met such freedom and tolerance.

Which brings me to another point which struck me when watching the Nick Griffin Question Time last week. For all of the accusations of racism leveled by the audience at Nick Griffin and the British National Party – an audience which consisted of a large number of people with immigrant origins – I started to wonder just how many of them are as accepting of other cultures and races as the British people have been? How many immigrants to this country actually give up their culture to integrate and live with us? How many immigrants are there who are quite happy to mix socially with us, adapt to our customs and lifestyles and even to intermarry with the indigenous British people? In fact, what we find from many of the immigrants represented by that Question Time audience is that they eschew the indigenous British people, preferring to live in their own communities, mixing with their own kind and marrying their own kind. They want nothing to do with us. Some of them even go as far as returning to their original countries to find a spouse – the thought of marrying a native of the country that they live in and demand full ‘birthrights’ in would appall them. Is this simply because they prefer their own kind – which begs the question of why they would come to this country in the first place and not remain in their own countries populated by their own people – or do they simply believe that their own kind are superior to the other races that inhabit Britain? Considering the disdain with which many of them treat the indigenous people of Britain, it would appear that they believe their race is superior, and considering how they refuse to integrate into the indigenous British culture and lifestyle but instead expect us to adapt our country to suit their cultures and lifestyles, it would appear that they are attempting to exert control of us. Superiority and Control, both part of the definition of a Racist.

So who are the Racists? The indigenous British people who just want to get on with their own lives, in their own country, with their own people and culture but have been extremely accommodating to immigrants from other races and cultures, or the people who have chosen to come here and have then created smaller versions of their own homelands, not only refusing to associate in any way with the indigenous people and culture but, by keeping hold of their own cultures, customs and lifestyles, attempting to destroy and replace our culture and way of life with theirs?

We must explode this myth of the racist indigenous British people and start to explore the racism of immigrants who refuse to give up their ’superior’ cultures and by doing so, are affecting the way that we live – therefore attempting to exert ‘control’ of us.