The dawn came up like thunder

A group of rather quaint flower children of all ages, and both sexes, received a  rude awakening to the realities of the Brave new EU world they live in when they were subjected to a rather harsh over reaction from an unexpected source. It seems that  the new EURulers of the former Nation of Denmark, once a bastion of respect for civil liberties, have taken a page from the defunct East German Stasi, (or maybe the US interrogators at Guantanamo) about crowd control, and a rather surprised bunch of sincere but rather brainwashed people, who had come to support the establishment approved stance on carbon emissions control, found themselves tied up and forced to sit in an extremely uncomfortable position for about five hours.

From the published pictures we can at least credit the Danes with one thing, they have not forgotten to be neat.  There was the perfectly straight fence made from police trucks and the neat  row of black clad riot police standing a regular intervals. Then,  like wrapped Turkeys all lined up in a freezer bin, tidy rows of people with their hand tied behind their backs forced to sit with their bottoms on the frozen pavement and their legs spayed out for hours.

‘But I didn’t do anything’ came the tearful wails of people struggling not to piss themselves, “we were just marching in the back of the Demonstration when the police surrounded us, boxed us in then told us we were under arrest and tied our hands behind our backs.”

Well, you all seemingly love the socialist collective society, so welcome to the brave new world of collective guilt and collective policing. You see, here is the thinking of the socialist big brother authority. Several small groups of young males had thrown fireworks and other missiles at the police, and then, groups of Denmarks  finest had been seen hidden behind police vans so they wouldn’t get their brand new riot gear smudged with fire cracker residue we presume.

Unfortunately, the pictures had gotten out and that made them look , well, rather like wimps to cops elsewhere (knowing cops, every where in European cities I can see little groups of cops sitting around tables making jokes about how “studly” the Copenhageners looked cowering from a few firecrackers.)  Bad form says the police brass. Something needs to be done,  We will show them.

So they practiced their standard group cut off and round up technique, on those who had the misfortune to be at the back of the queue away from the news cameras, celebrities, and parade marshals, on these surprised flower children. Or maybe they were going to practice it anyway just using this opportunity  to tune up on these people for things yet to come. Anyway, good exercise.

“Arrest and process 1000 people” says the brass ” Jahwall Mein Fuhrer” reply the lieutenants and Sergeants’, And low and behold, 997 people processed  and even 3 charged with hitting policemen. And didn’t they stay neatly in their rows for all that time!!  Why, I haven’t seen anything so orderly since. . .since . . since . . yes  I have it!!  Those pictures of Jews all lined up in rows at Dachau!!

By American Nationalist

Life in the Shark Tank

There was a young lady from Niger….who decided to ride on a tiger…

The thing that is curious about this is how quickly all the European politicians who had been making so many nice noises to the Europhile Brits of the Tories and Labour, turned around and showed their traditional “F U English” attitudes. First the adios to a no longer needed ToneeTony for an obscure Belgian and an even more obscure unelected British Peeress, now the bold announcement that the City of London investment policies will be scrutinized by the EU s regulating body.  The translation is that the EU intends  to swallow the City whole. I guess they were planning it all along and let Sarkovy give the word as a gauntlet thrown down while Labour is still in power. Methinks they want the dust settled on the initial shock of the kidnapping, and the City Banksters well into behind-the-scenes bargaining on the price of the ransom, before the General Election. Another scenario is that it could be that while everyone waits for the other shoe to drop on the USA debt bomb,  the European central bankers want to lasso the city and its assets to forestall a British US deal. Or worse to keep  them from withdrawing investment capital from the brave new EU world in anticipation that when the dollar busts out, it may take the Euro with it.

I read this as a small FU to the UK but a real FU to America, and as a patriotic politically active American , I intend to see that this  compliment from Paris and Berlin and Switzerland, as well as all the other ‘compliments’ over the last forty years  are understood and returned in the same sentiment, with one hell of a lot of interest.  The European Central Bankers with  Their Wall street bastard cousins and the City of London along for the ride planned this whole EU and NAU mess complete with the rape of the British and American middle classes called Free Trade.  Now these Banksters, having used us for half a century, are coming around like vultures to feed off our prostrate bodies, and they sure don’t want an independent City of London to breaks ranks and Invest in America, If populists are elected over here, and we go to a protectionist trade policy. They know the city would do that and abandon Europe in a  flash, the only  logic for a  shark being, when there is blood in the water, feed! These European SOBs did not like it when isolationist America prospered while they foundered, methinks  if I have my way, they are really gonna hate round two, especially if the BNP sits as a principal party in a government coalition in Westminster.

Some might wonder at the  reference, “for the last forty years”. I have a phrase for these people, the Bretton Woods Agreement. For those of you who do  not know, that was the meeting held by the world’s Banksters in the midst of WW2 when they decide to make the dollar the worlds reserve currency. Actually This was a lifeline thrown out to  the non American Banksters who all the while touting to the world the benefit of Laisse Faire capitalism, did not want to throw their own fates to the abilities of their own respective nations to revive their economies.  Since as a practical matter this would mean that the Banksters of the world were going to acquire masses of dollars,  They decide to anchor the dollar against inflation with the gold standard at thirty five dollars an ounce, a price that given the real world production cost of new gold , was even then massively overvalued for the Dollar in terms of that metal (unless you were using Africans at bare subsistence wages to dig it up, which they were).  But the Banksters greed was  not finished. they had already figured out that if  you anchor gold to an unrealistic paper money value, and in America  with the industrial wage even then, seventy dollars a week  it was already unrealistic,because smart Americans were going to redeem their excess paper for gold, as fast as they could.  So they made it  law allowing only Non Americans to demand gold redemption of dollars, still illegal for Americans to own gold and to safeguard the value even further these central European Banks had to give “Pledges” not to redeem and there by wipe out fort Knox. The Published theory was that with an American Balance of trade surplus Guaranteed for the foreseeable future, this pool of Dollars held in Europe and other areas would be reabsorbed into the US economy, and thus everything would go swimmingly.

Of course it did not. The Sharks know no rules about feeding and the Banksters, not needing to invest in anything even slightly risky in Europe( even  in 1947 and 19 48 when America was keeping the European population from starving with the Marshal plan these banksters kept the vaults of Switzerland locked tight to the desperate western Europeans)  invested massively in US industries, and so, when America prospered ,so did they.   Of course they garnered American currency by the ton. By the late sixties this pile of Eurodollars  was almost 80 billion and was used for inter  European trading. Also despite the pledges  the Dollar redemption for gold was now going on at an ever increasing rate, and  finally, with fort Knox becoming empty, the banksters took the dollar off the gold standard, and, shortly after that, dropped the proscription of Americans owning gold. Now the Dollar was truly adrift, and what was worse, the Puppet Ronald Reagan was in the oval office, and as a stupid man easily led by the nose he allegedly decided it was necessary to finish off the Soviet empire by tripling our national debt in a massive arms build up, which he somehow thought was necessary to stop communism. Of course anyone who actually knew how things were in the USSR, knew that the entire communist empire was a shell that was rotting apart, and sure to denigrate into warring states within the next decade, without Ronny’s “assistance”.

Reagan  was just parroting what his handlers, who wanted the government to print a pile of new currency backed by IOU,s of American borrowers, in other words for American workers to go further into debt so the Banksters could make another couple of trillion.  Next, since we swallowed that without a murmer, they cooked up free trade.

The Dollar in 2009 is now in really a piece of paper, backed up by the supposed ability of the average American worker to  pay $3750 a year just in T bill interest plus another $ 8000 in to run the federal government plus $4000 to run the state and local governments  plus $16,000 in other interest to private banks. After this $31,750 then he has to feed and clothe his or her family, pay for the cost of a car and other transportation,  medical care education, and the principle on his mortgage, house furnishings, higher education, and then if anything is left over, recreation.  And all the while this is happening the Industrial well paying jobs are still drying up, thanks to “free trade” and more and more Americans are making less and less.

The Dollar is now trapped in a doomed spiral of inflation and the European Banksters, knowing this, have been replacing it with the Euro as fast as possible. The new policy is for the Federal government to “loan” the American public whatever it needs to just keep enough of our industry going, to keep our heads just above water, which of course will mean more and more government bailouts thus further increasing the debt and inflating the dollar against the rest of the world currencies. Americans ,It is the plan are not to be let out of this downward spiral until our wages are on a par with  the rest of the third world.

Unfortunately for the Banksters more and more Americans are aware of this plan and are contemplating banksters the way men of the generation who fought world war 2 viewed German storm troopers and the Japanese army. In other words we are thinking of switching our diet to shark, and how nice it is going to be to seize all assets of these parasites wherever in the world we find them, with the American armed forces persuading reluctant national officials in Switzerland of our new” open the bank vault or else” policy. Most of us would like to see future Builderberger conferences held in Leavenworth federal prison.

But, wishful thinking of David Rockefeller  twisting on a gibbet  surrounded by his friends and peers world wide, doesn’t do the trick.  It is going to take hard work for Nationalists to educate millions of ordinary  people what happens when you let the powerful bankers control the government. They need to come to understand that only  thousands of dedicated people by volunteering their labor and time,  in true nationalist political parties, can we overcome the power of these privileged entrenched elite.

By American Nationalist

There are few times  in high level politics when the people involved show that they are really incompetent to hold the positions they have. In America we have been treated  to eight years of a stooge so inept he kept muffing his lines until finally his handlers had him saying nothing that was not completely scripted. But that was a first in the history of the Presidency

Then we had the governor of Illinois who was so indiscreet, such a loose cannon that  the establishment dumped him with a publicly leaked bribe soliciting tape  recording, as an anchor around his neck.

Now the British, in the run up  to one of the most critical Elections in their 2500 year history have the leader of the major spoiler Party, UKIP, the party that took the second highest number of seats in the recent EU election, the party that was poised to become the one that would force the Tories into a coalition government,  Lord Pearson, reveal   publicly that not only are he and Farage  completely inept,  but that Farage and a few stooges have been making the decisions all alone, with no infrastructure involved.

It is no wonder the parties strongest region, the southeast, has issue a quick ultimatum, disguised as an invitation, for Pearson to appear and explain himself. It is not often that in a few sentences  the leader of  a political party that is on the verge of becoming part of the power structure reveals himself as a fool and the central hierarchy of that party as a shell .

Just in case you have not realized what has happened here, it is essential to understand that a political party that seriously intends to run a government of a modern nation has to have a cadre , in fact a small army  of specialists ready to support the political hierarchy of that party run all the myriad functions of modern government,   You cannot just march in to office and appoint ministers to oversee permanent undersecretaries unless they are extremely familiar with how the departments are run, and you need a  slew of political appointees to fill  the various slots in the executive.  Lord Pearson revealed that the inside of his organization was such an empty shell that not only could he and Farage  make this preposterous offer, cold turkey, to David Cameron, without having a clue as to how he would respond, But they did not have to consult their cadre  beforehand,  because essentially, they did not have one.

Incidentally this is why Labour is trying to demonize BNP supporters, to make all those inside the government who are in the know about Labour’s terribly inept management afraid to contact the British National Party for fear they will lose positions. Fortunately for the People of the UK Thousands of civil servants support the BNP and when Labour is out of power and they Tories are forced into a coalition, be pouring out of the woodwork to join a BNP government. These include senior and retired Police officials who have had to sit by silently and watch Labour try and in many cases succeed in turning the best police service in the world into something resembling the East German Stasi.  There are also hundred s of military officers in all the services  thousands of school teachers and administrators, Barristers,  judges,  financial workers who have lost their jobs due to the greed of the top Banksters, health service workers , and many other honest British civil servants thoroughly fed up with the intimidation of the leftist system, that has forced them to keep totally silent if they wanted to preserve their livelihoods.   Anyone doubting this statement only needs to follow the pathetic tale of the dismissal of two outstanding  members of the Yeoman Warders at the Tower of London.

What is significant is that these people could have flocked to become the UKIP cadre, without much risk,  if the Parties executive council had opened the party up and tried to build a real party where decisions are made by the activist membership. That they, system insiders did not do so, is more indicative of what they actually thought of, or conversely what they were allowed to do  in a closed shop party run by old Tories, with but a single real issue, keeping the UKs bankers out of control by Brussels and Strasbourg, while retaining this financial system that has brought the great depression once again to the western world.

It would be wonderful if the large group of UKIP activists in the southeast as well as the south west would succeed in  getting Pearson to step down in favor of the number two candidate or conversely running the election for Party Chair once again, but if the history of UKIP is any indicator, Pearson, Farage and the rest of the hierarchy will close ranks and force the outraged membership to swallow what they have done in silence, or leave the Party. Either way this should be a massive boon to the BNP as soon as the membership approves the  new membership criteria which allows ethnic minorities to join.  That is because with a new chair the UKIP party will most likely withdraw candidates in BNP strongholds or if their is no new administration, with the UKIP membership once again forced to tow the line, there will be massive defections to the BNP.

Because so many of the UKIP rank and file activists and candidates are honest patriotic Brits,  I hope for the first circumstance, because as a practical matter, to force the Tories into coalition government this coming may the UKIP must win strongly in the South , and the BNP significantly in the North. But what will be, will be, and whatever the result, the Nationalist movement will be stronger in the coming year.

By American Nationalist

Political motivation vs. political reality, a study of British politics.

The quotation of  Oscar Wilde, “the British and Americans are two people separated by a common language.“  Is in the forefront of my thoughts as I write this, what I hope to be a guide to understanding British politics, for both the Brits and the Americans.

When one reads the broad selection of commentary in the British Newspapers, especially the flagship papers for the intelligentsia on the right and the left, which are the Telegraph and the Guardian  respectively, an American, used to the less disparate comments of our political scene on the west side of the pond, sometimes thinks he  has made a wrong turn and  is visiting the tower of Babel, (or the inside of a mad house.)

This article will attempt to sort out all the players, and explain their various motivations, so that hopefully both of our peoples will understand the system, and the many times bizarre way it functions.

American observers of our domestic political scene in the various  big city political machines, state capitals, and that strange place inside the Washington Beltway insiders here call Sodom on the Potomac, at least those of us observers who have lost our juvenile faith that one of the two political Parties is intrinsically better than the other,  have little trouble penetrating the rhetoric, and Identifying the groups of players, their actual agendas and loyalties.  The basic words in US politics are paymasters, and core constituency groups.  If You know who the players are in these groups for a specific politician, you can predict with astounding accuracy the political positions he or she will take on any specific issue. Conversely  the actual voting record, on specific facets of any piece of legislation, or the behind the scenes advocacy for various doctrines, gives a glimpse of the politicians actual controlling forces, which of course no politicians reveals in his or her public pronouncements.

If this sound too Machiavellian, to be true, then I submit to the reader that he better get out his copy of “The Prince” and read it. And this time pay attention.

American and British political systems differ, because American and British people differ in their self perceptions and their outlook on the world.  The irony is that American Society, which is much  more diverse in origin, is also much less fragmented in political opinion, which in turn is one of the reasons this nation has operated for so long under a two party system , when the  British system has now three “mainstream” Parties, two large minor parties, three regional Parties, and a slew of small minor Parties.

No understanding of the complexity of the British system is possible without first understanding the underlying motivations of the various classes of Brits who make up the modern UK.  The first thing Americans and British need to understand about the British  is that they are a people who  as a nation were once predominant on the world stage and cannot quite come to terms with the second class status the UK now has, as a no longer determinant body in world affairs.  Since this is written for both Americans and British I must explain to my American readers that, with the last sentence, I have just shot an arrow through my British cousins hearts, metaphorically speaking.

Most Americans who are concerned primarily with things in this nation, do not realize the tremendous sway and primary effect the British empire has had for the last three hundred years, over the affairs of the entire world. In the Latter half of the twentieth Century, America has been dominant, but even that dominance has largely served to complete the work of establishing the Anglo Saxon culture as preeminent in the world, and that preeminence is largely the work of Great Britain.

So now when the British, who have contributed so much, look at their nation, shorn of its political dominance of the English speaking world, even shorn of its industrial base by voracious international capitalists,  are unable to cope with this loss of majesty, they seek substitutes, and their individual rationalizations  about their choices form the basis of their political attachments.

With the caveat that any categorization involves inherent simplification of complexities and thus reduction in accuracy, I will lay out the basic political groupings amongst the various  British classes and some of the whys and wherefores of these

Since these people, financially speaking, are at the top of the heap, we first need to discuss the  Conservative Party, the Tories, and their various groupings of political supporters.  The most important thing to understand about the Tories is no matter what they say their leadership follows the dictates of the international Banksters without the slightest deviation.  They are Europhiles not because these Brits love continentals, they do not. They cordially hate the French , Patronize the Germans, and hold the Italians in contempt.  But they are financial pragmatists first and foremost and they believe to a man, that their bread is baked  in Zurich and buttered in Strasbourg.  The international Banksters have created this Kluge, this European monster, as the next Roman empire and the for the top Brits, it is their new  ego toy, predestined to continue the world dominance they  have enjoyed for the last three centuries. Furthermore, it is the British banking families who are amongst those at the top of the heap, and a whole bunch of Tories, who butter their own bread in the City of London (translated into American, work for the banks)  pin their hopes upon the success of that confederation, which they believe is predestined to replace America as the new financial powerhouse of the world.

The top Tories aren’t the only Brits who have cast their fate  on this shiny new vision. There are legions of hangers on throughout the social spectrum  who have also cast their fate with the success of this brave new world.  These include what we in America would call upper Middle class Brits, college educated and for the most part professionally employed, or at least with well remunerated “white collar” employment in the capitalist sector, mostly in large firms.  They have their salaries, their suburban houses and their easy lifestyles. They want to appear urbane and sophisticated, and even if they do not really buy into the whole “multicultural” shtick, they can sure fake it well enough.  These people represent the core Tory voter.  All in all, the Tory voters are the easiest to understand and if they had a universal motto it would be ” don’t rock the boat”.

The other predominant political Party is Labour,  the Party which to American pragmatic eyes is  a collection of the oddest bedfellows he has ever seen or expected to see in the western world .  This Labour Party is actually Nu LABOUR and it was formed when Tony Blair forced the stodgy old communists  in the old labor party to, at least publically, abandon their Marxist Ideas about the government forcible redistribution of wealth.   The current supporting electorate of this  party is a mixture the old left who are smart enough to see that the Red fringes In the Socialist workers Party will never achieve political power, and the old working class drones ( “my father voted Labour and His father before him and  I will always vote Labour,”) and the immigrant ethnic blocks who believe that only the Labour party will assure their protected status.  The Old left pragmatists with their Frankfort school ethics and their anti-religious views who run the Labour Party,  also favor the EU because its policy of cultural genocide matches their own.  You cannot preach to them on the financial consequences of grabbing a tiger by the tail  for the more venal of them are  more than satisfied  to milk a leftist bureaucrat rich social system for  the myriads of well paid sinecures it provides, and the idealists hate the Tories too much to ever change the way they vote  no matter how degrading their lifestyle becomes.

The swing voters those who bounce between Tories and Labour  are ill educated in real politik but are pragmatically concerned primarily with their own economic situation. They are usually swayed by the opposition party whenever the government Party is in power in an economic recession. That is why currently the Labour Party has almost no chance of winning the next election, which by British law, must be called by May 2010.

The third  establishment Party, which might be called “Tory lite” is the Lib Dems. Politically they position themselves somewhere between the Conservative and Labour, which in practice means they really do  not stand for anything.  The ten percent of the nation that votes for them are somehow convinced that they are the enlightened ones,  capitalist without being mean towards the labouring man  and concerned about societies social problem without proposing anything that will actually cost them much money. Politically correct; their voters come from upscale semi urban areas that have no problems with the cultural issues of the ethnic ghettoes.

Going to the regional parties one comes in order of influence to the Scottish National Party  It is what it says and advocates essentially a poetical split between Scotland and the rest of the UK.   It campaigns for sovereignty but its leadership has no problem with the complete surrender of sovereignty  to the EU.  It has no economic policies, no plans to protect Scottish culture or to attempt to revitalize Scottish industry, thus it is second, even in Scotland, to the Labour Party.  Outside Scotland it does not exist.

Next we have Plaid Cyrmu in Wales, a party whose name means Welsh national but whose support is largely gathered from the Moslem community in Wales which it courts assiduously. It managed to get one of the three  MEP seats in Wales and has control of a few councils but otherwise has no influence, or presence anywhere else.

The third sectarian nationalist party  is once again in northern Ireland and is the well know IRA political wing, Sinn Fein.  Hard core communist  and anti British  in policy , it represents  the ethnic Catholics in northern Ireland  but just as the other two, has no support or relevance anywhere else.

Now we come to the large minority Parties first and foremost, the most important the British National Party. This party is the true opposition in the UK to the destruction of British sovereignty in that creation of the international  Banksters which is the European Union. This is the only genuinely populist political Party in Great Britain and as such is the only viable threat to the European federalist oligarchy. Consequently it is the most reviled party by the establishment and it press. They never cease to castigate the party and its membership, knowing full well if it takes power most of the criminal collaborators in the British establishment face exposure, ruin, and in many cases long terms of imprisonment.

Since  the  political establishment that controls the three main parties has staked all on becoming part of the European Bureaucracy, They must stop the BNP at all costs.  This creates somewhat of a problem, for the British people who know the truth about the BNP and what  it really represents, are its staunch defenders,  and  the establishment has largely failed in its attempt to demonize the party, thus to enable brutal repressive measures that the vast majority of the British public, no matter which party they support, will not countenance, and would in fact be political suicide  for any party  to attempt. So the leadership of the BNP cannot be  removed or physically attacked like the nationalist party in Hungary, Jobbick, has been by the security police, and the extreme violence provoking attacks by  the Communist UAF has generated little but disgust from Brits of all political stripes at the way the police allow them to get away with all sorts of political violence, during so called “peaceful demonstrations”.

The failure of the establishment to demonize the BNP has only failed in working class areas, however.

The people there know the local BNP as “good honest blokes”  ” not scum like the ‘toffs’ call them” and the only reason why they haven’t  kicked the Labour party entirely out of white working class areas is their sense that they can’t go along with the BNP’s all white British ideal. In fact, the only people who hate the BNP are divided not politically but socially, because, and this is something Americans do not understand, Brits have an ingrained “class consciousness” that  forms their basic outlook and is much more important  to many of them than their common British Nationality. Quite simply put, the Middle class (translated into American  white collar college educated well spoken) actually despises the undereducated  mostly underpaid working class. And the working class similarly does not like the toffs. And though you find members o f the Middle class both in the Tories and in Labour, you almost never find the hard core white working class  in the industrial areas, supporting the Tories, no matter what Labour has done to them.

So the Propaganda painting the BNP as uncouth lower class goons has done its job amongst  the more dim witted of the middle class who unashamedly parrot the lies the establishment tells about it. The fact  that Griffin has a law degree from Cambridge evokes tirades of denial that he is intelligent and competent , these people cannot disturb their fantasy that somehow they are mentally superior to Griffin, when quite obviously  they are not.

The minions of the media not only cater to this self deception of  the common herd of somewhat thick Tories, they do everything in their power to keep these conceited know nothings in their state of denial, and not being able to shut Griffin out of the media entirely,  when they do get him on, go to fantastic lengths to keep him on the defensive about the ethnic policy of the BNP, and not allow him to get into an open discussion of the political policy of the ruling elite.

For indeed the underlying struggle the raison de Terre of the political class is to support the financial oligarchy in its never ending game for more power and wealth.   The super rich Brahmins have for some time define the political struggle as to keep the world from being submerged in a tide of egalitarianism. To have to give up their bloated life styles even for a well appointed  house in suburbia, to be submerged in a rising tide of endlessly breeding humanity. This is their ultimate nightmare and they will go to any lengths to prevent its happening even to a genocidal  ”limited” nuclear war.  Having no faith in a God or the prospect of the next life, they do whatever they perceive as necessary to cling to their position of privilege in this one.

To accomplish this they have to perpetually manipulate their underlings, the functionaries of the ruling classes, the business and political leaders, to carry out their policies. the bribes are rendered hierarchically, in form and amount sufficient to assure the compliance of each component of the infrastructure, and penalties for those who don’t  ”go along to get along” are delivered as well.

Of course this knowledge of how the system really operates is the political equivalent of the religious  states of enlightenment teasingly proffered as  the goal to practitioners of some oriental religions.  It is the only real  contribution of  Karl Marx, the knowledge that there are some at the top of the pyramid whose only goal is power and their version  of  ”lebensraum” that requires, in their view, a significant downward adjustment in the world’s population.  The only thing worse in fact that than the knowledge that it is these people who run the world, and will ,no matter what we do, continue to exercise a disproportionate influence in how it is run, is the Marxist nightmare of the regimented masses forever toiling in a dreary society of bureaucratically enforced  godless proletarian “equality”. That may not be the dream of the die hard Communists, but demonstrably  and invariably, it is the result of Communism.

The member of the BNP understand, just as their forefathers, the historic British yeoman who were subjugated by their Norman overlords understood , that an oligarchy is going to be with us perpetually, but it is up  to the people to limit the power and rapacity of those classes who have no self limiting mechanism.  This is not done by attempting to enforce the Communist concept of almost absolute social and financial parity, but by ensuring that these lions of commerce and industry do not aggrandize their wealth by monopolistic control of all material engines of wealth, which leaves the common people struggling in a perpetual tightening downward spiral of an economic and social straightjacket.   The accomplishment of this the regulation of the rapacity of societies wealthy, while not stifling our star performers, is an art, rather than a set of cut and dried rules, as changing times and conditions requires constant change in the rules.

However, certain basic principles abide.  The first is concentrations of power are dangerous, and any concentration higher than the nation state extremely dangerous, hence alliances and treaties should be of necessity for the good of the people,  temporary in nature, to be renegotiated when the disadvantages of such outweigh their advantages.  The second principle is a corollary to the first,  power within the nation must be divided and devolved to the lowest levels possible.

The BNP hierarchy all understand these principles thoroughly. In fact, the restricted nature of the voting membership has enabled the BNP to largely limit its leaders to those whose life experience  has enabled them to agree  to these concepts.  This is necessary for nothing is so essential to a relatively small party, beset on all sides by enemies, than unity of basic purpose. Those who can’t see that they are fighting the entire power structure of the EU, and agree to work together, are of necessity removed from positions where they can damage the party, or if they are too rebellious, from the Party entirely. For the BNP to do otherwise at this stage would be suicidal.

This is not a complete explanation of the BNP but it is sufficient so that serious minded people can see that the British National Party is worth the time and energy to investigate, and, if they find things as I have stated, support. Most Brits agree with many of the concepts of limited interchange with Europe that does not impede the national sovereignty of the UK and a limit to the international bankers rapacity that has caused the current financial crisis .  The only reason they do not flock to the BNP are, as previously stated, the perception of it as a low brow low class mob. However many of them can no longer support the current Lib Lab Con EU project.

For these people, essentially Tories who are smart enough not to try riding tigers, the Party of choice is the one created by dissenting Tories. That party is UKIP. or spelled out the United Kingdom Independence Party.   The 2009 European elections revealed that on the issue of the EU their support was stronger than Labour. In fact the only reason the Tories beat them in the number of supporters, was because David  Cameron, the leader of the Conservative Party, held out as a lure, something he hoped he would never have to keep, a promise of a public referendum on the Lisbon treaty.

However smart they are about not riding the tiger, and thereby not marching to the tune of the Banksters, UKIP is really a Party made up of fools.  They think they can force the Conservative Party to adopt their position on Europe when all most all the financial backers of the Tories are controlled by the banks.

The  laisee faire attitude of the UKIP party leaders cannot let them see the truth. Either the government controls the banks, or the bankers control the government.  There are no power vacuums in politics. If you won’t ride the tiger because you know you will be eventually killed by it, you better get the whip and the gun and cage it or you will end up as lunch anyway. The idea that you can stand aloof, a personal island of political principles  in a sea of change, without taking on in full battle  those who hold opposing principles is absurd.

Anyway in practice it seems the  anti EU principles of the UKIP leadership may be mere posturing, no matter what the rank and file believe.  In Barking, old Labour territory that the UKIP Toffs cannot possibly win, they are following the same destructive plan they tried in Barking and Dagenham in 2007, when they put up opposition candidates to oppose the BNP slate that swept the electorate and has now become the official opposition on the local council.   They are planning to oppose Nick Griffins’ run against Margaret Hodge by putting up a candidate to act as spoiler and siphon anti EU votes from the BNP. Since in practice it is going to take all the UKIP seats they can win in the south of England, plus all the seats the BNP can wrest from Labour in the industrial areas, to force a coalition government on the Tories, their action is unjustifiable. It is beyond foolish to sabotage your allies.

However making foolish stands on alleged principles without attempting to discover  the nature scope, organization, and power of the established structure you are opposing, is another quirky facet of the some British people.  There are a myriad of small parties, of which,  the logic of their go it alone stance, and even of their principles,  makes most of their cadre and even supporters belong in the mentally ill category. To put it bluntly, denial is not a river in Africa, it is the mental state of about eight or nine percent of the British electorate, who support political parties like the Greens, the English Democrats, NO2 EU, or the Socialist Workers Party, Most of these do not even have a logically coherent platform, in terms of real politik.  None of them stand the chance of a snowball in a furnace, when it comes to taking power or affecting policy.

Successful politics is a matter of joining the Party that most closely follows your views, then working together with the membership to make it successful in elections.  Being divisive Insisting on your views prevailing when you are in the minority, and forming secret cliques against the leadership of that Party when you don’t get your way, is the type of behavior children engage in and is by definition mentally aberrant behavior in an adult. If you are not a child and you oppose a certain stance of the Party you are in,  you have two choices, One is to keep your opposition to that aspect of Party policy to internal party circles, stating your position to the membership but willingly and publically supporting the majority position. If the principle is so basic, so important to you that you cannot stop supporting it, you must Publically stand against the leadership , then resign from that party and try to find a group of like minded people.  And, this is a reality check. If  you find a policy or principle that, in your mind, is so overwhelmingly important, but you cannot convince a sufficient number of people to also support this principle, it is most  probable that the flaw is not in all those that oppose, but in the idea that you are trying to  sell to them.

Anyway, politics is the art of the possible, and if you don’t have the vast wealth of the Banksters,  the possible is defined by your support base for your ideas, and the allies you can garner.  It takes strong principles and  hard work, openness and honesty and the willingness to engage in free discussion with others, as well as a knowledge of how the system works,  to achieve  a political system that will make your nation and community a decent place to live.  It is a constant struggle where each generation does its part in the battle for freedom and decency, not something that can be won once and for all for all time. Finally it is a vital struggle for honorable men  and women cannot placidly coexist with corruption and evil.  It is in our nature to fight it, and if we do not, then something good dies within us.

By American Nationalist

The Harlot Church

The Church of England otherwise known as the Anglican or Episcopal Church, is not a Christian church.  I have been jolted out of my reverie by a series of actions taken by various functionaries of the COE to write this missive. Please feel free to copy and distribute it where hopefully it will do some good.

Simply put at almost no time in its checkered history has the Church of England actually been a body of Christ. Its beginnings were not in a ministry listening to the voice of the lord and founding a mission, but rather in the greed of a king and his economic adviser Cecil. The story of Henry the eighth and his desperate desire to father a male heir to the thrown is well known, as is the part in this drama played by the Spanish Court when it pressured the Pope to deny Henry his divorce.  There were few Christians inside the established Church at that time, and even fewer Christ led leaders. Nevertheless  I believe that God approved the split with the extremely corrupt Church of Rome.

However, what I am sure of is that God absolutely did not approve of Henry and his group of rapacious court followers seizing the monastic lands of that church throwing out the only real Christian communities within it and then selling those lands for reduced prices to his followers. The real Christian leadership that refused to countenance this theft were driven from the Church and persecuted by the King, in some cases martyred.  The ones who decided to go along to get along with Henry, kept their positions and their pampered lifestyle, including the barely hidden sexual debaucheries that were allowed as “princes of the church” in what was now “Henry’s church”, with that bloated adulterer taking the position formerly held by the Pope. This however eased up the persecution of the real Christian Church of the time , then known as the Lollards, because, if  for no other reason,  the new “christian” Church of England and Great Britain itself needed all the protestant support they could get to fight of the power of Catholic Spain and Rome, so they gave these Lollards breathing room during the reign of Elizabeth and James. But from the very start the COE has been a political beast riding on the support from King and Parliament and in turn  giving its allegiance to the powers of the State.

The varying degrees where the COE suppressed or allowed to grow true Christ led New Testament Churches always depended on the political winds. Indeed it was this political uncertainty which drove the pilgrims to settle in North America.( and it was the Scotch Presbyterian raised James I, who  always kept the COE at an arms length, who gave them leave to do it) It was not until the British state granted religious freedom in the late nineteenth century that other authentic Christian bodies were even allowed to build church buildings in the UK and even then ,a portion of peoples taxes, still, contrary to the Word of Christ, were used to support this institution.

So when last May, the political leadership of the Labour and Tory Parties met with their sycophants at Saint Paul’s, it did  not surprise me that this collection of sexual deviants and humanist oddities were easily pressured into issuing, what amounted to a Fatwah, against the BNP.  Being fools and not heeding the warning about taking The Lords name in vane they issued their blanket pronouncement that being a member of the BNP was incompatible with being a member of the COE.

If these hypocrites and liars had left the name of the living God out of their pronouncement,  It would still be possible for me to ignore their blasphemy, but no they boldly went ahead and condemned the BNP as anti Christian, confident that no real Christians were going to expose them.

Just so there can be no mistake, let me make myself clear, the purple robed leadership of the COE who supported this incontrovertibly unchristian edict did it because the politicians asked them to and, not being Christians themselves, they did not understand the grave offense they committed. A Christian does NOT EVER pronounce what amounts to a blanket condemnation on a large group of people.  PERIOD. IN FACT THE ONLY SPIRITUAL REASON THAT I AS A CHRISTIAN AM ALLOWED BY THE WORD OF GOD, IN FACT COMPELLED BY IT, TO MAKE THIS PUBLIC PRONOUNCEMENT AGAINST THEM IS THEIR PUBLIC CONDEMNATION OF OTHERS .

In all other cases, If a Christian daring to speak boldly and pronounce some individual ethically unfit to be in the church he needs to follow first the admonition of Christ, about removing the log in thine own eye before going after the splinter in someone else’s, and next the admonitions of Paul, which are to meet first privately with the alleged malefactor and discuss his alleged transgressions, then, if they get no response have the body of elders meet with him and only then if in fact he or she is in the wrong and he refuses to mend his ways, shun him.  The hypocritical pronouncement by that collection of Sodomites, Pantheists and Druids which comprises the hierarchy of the Church of England followed none of this procedure, but then expecting charlatans and posers to behave like  Christians  is in itself, ridiculous.  The Roman Catholic hierarchies never bothered with the real substance of Christianity so why should this group of costumed functionaries who were spawned from it??

The blanket “fatwa” pontificated by these posers, postulates several things against the BNP, and the summation of all of the charges is that they are said to be guilty of hating other people because they are of a different Race.  Leaving aside the blanket aspect of the charge which assumes everybody in the entire BNP organization to be guilty of this charge, and the fact that it was leveled without even one of the leaders of the COE even speaking to anybody in the BNP,  this charge has been categorically denied By the BNP, which quite reasonably points out that being one of the most overcrowded medium sized nations in the entire world, entitles a person residing in it, to hold the LEGITIMATE OPINION THAT THERE IS NO NEED TO CRAM MORE PEOPLE IN.  This belief has nothing to do with ones Christian responsibilities  for nowhere in the scriptures does the Word of God say cramming masses of people in a small nation and crowding out the indigenous inhabitants, as being a spiritual duty of his followers.

If you the reader, want to know if the building you enter, which has the name of Christ on a sign out front, actually houses a group of Christians, ask any one you meet inside, when and where are the bible studies held.?  You see, real Christians, as opposed to posers,  meet in small groups at regular locations and times  to study the Word of the Lord.  No bible study groups translates to no Church of Christ.  Going once a week on Sunday to listen to an organist  play a half dozen mostly ancient hymns and watch a man in a costume deliver generic homilies for 45 minutes from the pulpit, has nothing to do with the exciting dynamics of a real spirit filled Christian church, and once you have been a part of the real thing, you won’t settle for the bland imitation. The reason so many of the old COE Buildings are closing their doors and even more obscenely for a Christian Church, selling their properties to the Demon inspired Moslems, is because they are spiritual deserts, and when the last of the old parishioners, who attend the services out of long habit, passes on to reside in the church graveyard, no one else feels the slightest reason to make those edifices his or her place of worship.

British Christians have had to tolerate the existence of this mockery of the church of Jesus Christ for centuries, because just like its sister Harlot church,  the Church of Rome, it has been supported by the political State, and Christians are forbidden by Christ to use force to cleanse these edifices of their corruption. However the Lord has not forgotten them and since none of the leaders of these caricatures of Christianity has repented and asked for it, forgiven them either.  If you wish to know their fate you can read the Book of Revelations chapter seventeen.

By American Nationalist

Nick Griffin is not odious. He is Not a Nazi.  He is what he says he is; a British Nationalist Fed up with the plans to turn Britain into an extremely overcrowded multicult nation, trampling on British Heritage, pride, and the scenic beauty of its countryside by importing hordes of foreigners. These moronic  non-ethnic British UK citizens and the equally moronic ethnically British, heads full of the EU dream – Europhiles, these critics of Griffin, who claim to be loyal patriotic Brits but who call Griffin a Nazi, completely miss the point.

Yes they are right. the ethnically non British UK citizens, are by the large majority fine upstanding citizens, as are also the majority of the people who want to emigrate from their homelands and go to someplace better.  But by conservative estimates, there are at least a Billion of these would be immigrants in the world, and the UK is already massively overcrowded at 61 million.  So the fact is there is no room for more, and even if you overstuffed this Island with ten million more, right now, that ten million would  not be one percent of all the nice people who live somewhere else, in a country which currently has a lower standard of living than the UK, and who would, if given a chance, gladly trade their primitive hut for a flat in Birmingham. That ten million would also be replaced, in less than a year, by new children born in these countries which don’t contribute much to the world but another mouth to feed.

The obvious answer to people living in third world conditions  is for them to curb their birthrate and bring their nations up to modern standards themselves, not to overpopulate much of the world and overcrowd the West.  That goes for using any Western nation as a safety valve for an exploding boiler,  including the USA, and especially the already most crowded  nations of the west. The UK – at 640 persons per square mile – is at the top of this list of western nations, exceeding every nation in  Europe but tiny Belgium and The Netherlands. In fact,  the UK exceeds in population density, every large and middle sized Nation in the entire world except India, Bangladesh, Japan, and the Philippines and equals the population density of Viet Nam. This fact, that the nations of the world must take responsibility for their own conditions, is so obvious, that anyone but a brainwashed politically correct Liberal can see it. It is time to stop putting up with abuse by these extremely dense and prejudiced people, and to let all and sundry know of your opinion and the rationale behind it.

Finally, the Liberals who would grovel in the dirt before anyone with a darker skin rather than be called “racist”, and these self righteous immigrants, who claim the “right” to live anywhere they choose, are curiously blind to the “racism” and logical contradiction  of simultaneously insisting that the western world has a duty to help the non-Caucasian world achieve western standards of living because the non-white cannot be expected to do this on their own,  and contrarily asserting that these same unfortunate third worlders are equal in every respect to the rest of us.

Of course they are equal, and they have equal rights and responsibilities with all the other people in the world, including the responsibility to respect the human rights of their fellow citizen’s to their own homeland! The Idea that they are somehow unable to and not responsible for raising their own living conditions through political struggle, just as the nations of the west did, is really a very racist concept!

The sanctimonious Liberals who tell us we must be “Christian” that we must sacrifice to help our brown and black brothers, miss the point.  The Good Samaritan helped a seriously injured man lying in the road.  These would-be immigrants are fully healthy and should be expected to take care of themselves and their own problems.

Of Course, these liberals do not really sacrifice their own standard of living. They expect to maintain their regular jaunts abroad and those condos in Spain. (or in the case of Parliament, second homes in London and moat cleaning at public expense.)  They are quite willing to sacrifice the lifestyle of other British people, mostly British industrial workers who do produce useful objects, and  retired British workers, who spent a lifetime in useful service, to their lofty pipe dreams and sanctimonious proclamations.

By ‘American Nationalist‘

Foreword: You had better get a cup of tea, this is a big one that is well worth the read.

This article is written to expose the forces that, if unchecked, will lead to the extinguishing of liberty in the cradle of western civilization

In American we are more blessed than most of us know. Our constitution enumerates human rights that the rest of the world does not possess . However our focus upon third world and communist nations that are historically seen as the centers of Human oppression should not blind us to what is happening in nations we traditionally think of as supporting international Human rights.

The most alarming thing is that it is in some of the nations of the former British empire, specifically the UK and Canada, that leftists together with the forces of international capitalism have joined together to encroach  most dangerously on human freedom.  Ironically most of the leftist cattle are so focused on the utopia that they hope to create that they ignore the horror that they are creating. This is what happens when people with mediocre intelligence and moral sensibility embrace  a chimerical vision of human perfectibility and are manipulated by more cunning and vicious masters.

As a Christian I know only Christ is perfect and the best Human laws are those which restrain the least, and are  only necessary to protect life liberty and property .  All laws which seek to direct or constrain Human thought are absolutely wrong,  those which constrain Human freedom must only be to the extent that they  protect the first two, life and liberty,  and human property essential for the enjoyment of human life must be protected  as individual property up to the point where the amassed possession of such property by individuals is congruent with the rights of society as a whole.

The left-bankster coalition of which I speak threatens all three of these principles.  The deluded leftists are the useful idiots, the shock troops  of a disaster which threatens us all.

Laws and governments, basic principles

No one in this world has as of yet said it better than Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence,  ”To protect these things( life liberty and the pursuit of happiness )governments are instituted amongst men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,” This is basic declaration that implies, foremost, any power that does not have the consent of the majority is morally void  The next concept he puts forth ” is that when any( power) becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it” The importance of this is the onus that it is the responsibility OF THE PEOPLE to continually examine the workings of the government to see WHETHER IN  PRACTICE the government is inflicting misery on the people, DESPITE ANY THEORIES or explanations that the government may argue that it is attempting to follow.

A look at actual governments, as the  historical record proves the effects of their actions, will show that there are many forces which compete with each other to create the types of governments that have evolved amongst men. On the whole, they have been anything but good. The basic forces of the Human existence bear the first mention, for no understanding of human history is possible without an understanding of these.  They are, love, hate, fear, and greed.   Love, the regard for one other than oneself, the very force of God that creates the universe is the Divine force that makes civil human interaction possible.  The three other forces present in this world (but not according to scripture in the next,) are what makes the practice of governance and the structures of this , governments. necessary. Unfortunately, history reveals that most of the past governments in our world were basically instruments of theft  and oppression, with protection of the people a concept given much lip service but little actual support.

Human beings have, over the course of history, tried many forms of such governments. Ever since tribes grew into city states then nation states, peopleof good will have striven to defeat those of bad will or warped vision and vice versa.   It was the growth of the understanding of Human rights principles for Christians on that “sceptered  Isle”  that was unique in all the world, in this land, England. This is where these principles first achieved human recognition  and were put in initial written form starting in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries  by Tynesdale and Wycliffe.

These men and their ideas were brutally suppressed by the ruling Norman elite, but nevertheless, these concepts took gradual hold amongst the more discerning of the population. We had evolved from a tribal society to a province of Rome,  to scattered small hereditary kingdoms under constant attack from outsiders, to a coalesced kingdom of  vassal strongholds under the rulership of the line of Wessex to much the same with a superimposed hierarchy of Norman warriors,  to a mixed system of intricate small vassalages and fee holdings interspersed with city guilds, run by a hierarchy of merchant  bankers.

The established, Romanized “Christian “Church, the purported source of all moral and spiritual authority, coexisted with this arrangement, but was never an independent body, its leadership being appointed by the civil authority.

As  I have said ideas of true independent Christians,  Tynesdale , Wycliffe  and later Locke, were accepted in theory by the perceptive members of the populace even though they were constrained by the oligarchy from putting them into practical effect.  This is why at the beginning of the seventeenth century  Christian pioneers petitioned King James to start a colony in America. a land three thousand miles away from the oppression of the hierarchy. there, they established the first truly free Christian government where a person’s property was his or her own and their lives , choice of occupations, the very liberty to go where they pleased when they pleased was for the first time in history, not under the control of an oligarchy.

There were still the necessary conventions of governance however. land had to be divided and granted. Criminal actions had to be defined,  the malefactors apprehended and punished ,and measures for the common defense undertaken.  Civil offices had to be created and filled for these necessary functions, and taxes laid and collected to pay for them.  The unique thing was that for the first time  in modern history, the drafting of the laws creating the structure of these offices and the elections of persons to fill them were done completely democratically, with the head of each household having one equal vote.  This milestone in Human events is one of the most important because although  England had had a Parliament  Its  members powers were both limited and the members themselves were chosen in varying ways ,most of these not democratically. The other principle that evolved was the extension of the jury trial to all matters civil and criminal, long before that was the practice in England

Mean while back in the old world  of England the struggle was still ongoing between the forces of Parliament representing the mercantilists and the sovereign representing the Feudalist. However, this time that personage was not a pragmatist like Elizabeth, nor a determined protestant like the Scotch raised James, but his son Charles, who was unfortunately determined to bring back the powers of the monarchy that Elizabeth, of necessity, had ceded to Parliament.  To do this Charles had made a devils bargain with the throne of France  with the support of both the Papacy, that wanted the church of England returned to the Roman fold and the Spanish, who wanted a check upon the rapacious English mercantilists.( It was they as privateers, backed by the nascent Banksters, who had vastly reduced  Spain as  a naval power. )

Since Charles I could raise no funds without Parliament, and he was adverse to having Parliament look into his affairs, he tried to govern for many years without calling for a new session,  living on his own lands and properties plus loans from sympathizing catholic leaning nobility. This could not last forever. He ran out of money and had to call parliament which promptly proceeded to hamstring him further.  Things came to a head and Charles declared war on parliament in 1647, but he lost both the war and his own head in 1649. After the commonwealth period when Cromwell ruled,  the Monarchy was restored. However, things had changed a bit and Charles II had to give  up quite a bit more of his power to parliament. Parliament had also changed and the hereditary nobility in the House of lords had to give up even more of their power to the House of Commons

These people were still completely behind the times  as far as political enlightenment had proceeded in America, where  the kings governor was usually little more than a figurehead.  The crown may have appointed him, and he the high judge, but the elected assemblies of each colony made all the laws, raised and collected all the taxes, and the jury system was applied to all trials.

The reason that was to cause the colonies to rebel and throw off the shackles of the king was that by  then, just as it is now, to quote Oscar Wilde “the English and the Americans were two people separated by a common language”. The meaning of that was that  after one hundred and fifty years the Americans understanding of what were ” the rights of Englishmen” was completely different than that of the common man in England. The Americans were free men.  The homage they paid to the king was about as much as a man of my maternal  grandfathers  generation (he was a London bus motorman during the 1930’s great depression and world war 2) would have paid him.  In other words an Americans obedience was limited to politeness, and a man had his rights. The ordinary Englishman of the eighteenth Century was by contrast, no more than a serf.  He obeyed his “betters” as a matter of course and his concepts of his rights was limited to not being robbed or killed by anyone, including the nobility, as long as he fulfilled his duties of his station in life.   That was better than a medieval serf but not the same as being a free man. The common English man could not improve his position in society.

The fact that Americans and English both spoke the same language disguised the fact that there was a gulf between the two nations in terms of basic perception of ones position in society,  and that fact,  was understood by few.  When the English and Americans had firmly defeated the French in the mid 1760’s the British  oligarchy, now well mixed with banksters, now proceeded to treat the Americans just as they treated their own commoners; as tax cows to be milked.

The American insistence that they be consulted first was misunderstood as was their determination not to return to serf hood.   This little misunderstanding started a shooting war in 1775, but by 1781 most of the British Oligarchy  got the point, if grudgingly.  Shooting Americans was a risky sport, not only did they shoot back, but because so many of them were familiar with guns and had well cared for rifles instead of brown Bess muskets,  The British Officers, even more than the enlisted men, were  more likely to find early graves rather than glory and riches. (My American ancestors were  contemptuous of the so-called nobility and preferred shooting them to some poor private soldier,  and were  damned unsporting about it.)

So the imperial Brits, funded by the banksters, went elsewhere  to look for lands to conquer, much to the dismay of the Boers and  Indians, and other Asians and Africans.  Meanwhile we Americans had codified our rights under a Constitution and later fought another war to stop the Brits from kidnapping our seaman.   The British Oligarchy, who hadn’t learned their lesson In the Revolutionary War had to be taught all over again by Jackson in New Orleans. After a brief battle lasting less than 30 minutes with almost 2000 of their men dead and wounded,  a couple of British generals learned the hard way.

Charging American rifles, especially if they are behind a  protective earthen berm, is a bad idea.  Even if the British soldiers  outnumbered us 4 to 1. And our ancestors  learned something also.  The right to keep and bear arms, if one becomes practiced in the use of such arms, ordinary farmers and backwoodsmen can defeat trained soldiers. This was almost exactly the same lesson, those other “ordinary citizens”  English and Welsh archers, taught to the French Knights and men at arms in the fourteenth and early fifteenth century.

The codification of American rights in a constitution that was binding upon the government, is something that was not and is still not understood by the average British man in the streets.  Here is the theory in simplified terms for your edification.  One we divided the government in as many parts as possible so that one person or group of people cannot oppress any ordinary citizen  Two we codified absolutely some  rights that every American has that no government  official  OR THE WHOLE LOT OF THEM PUT TOGETHER can take away.  Three among these rights  we gave ourselves  the tools to stop oppressive governments; the freedom of speech, press,  and assembly and the right to jury trial and the perpetual right to keep and bear arms( That means powerful deadly accurate handguns and assault rifles) to ensure  that the government cannot take these rights away. Four We teach all these rights to every American in school so he knows what he or she  has and why he or she has it.( we have not nearly done well enough with # 4, IMHO )

Things for British ordinary people had not improved, now not only were the ordinary people virtually bound to an occupation, working hard for little remuneration, but The oligarchy drove the tenants from their land with the various laws, drastically reducing, the once  common yeoman farmer class . In his books , Charles Dickens describes this period  best.  The rights of Englishmen were many times the right to choose between  crime, starving in the gutter, or the work house.

Meanwhile over here across the pond we Americans, in the late nineteenth century, were coming to grips with the latest tools of oppression by the capitalist oligarchy (The  European Banksters had intermarried with the American wealthy and created our own class of oligarchs)  These tools were monopoly capitalism and financial capitalism. Even In Europe there were people looking at the problem . One of them was  a not too bright German by the name of Karl Marx.

The Americans  solutions to these problems were different than what Marx proposed.  Marx, who did not understand the situation was a result of normal human greed tied to perpetual access to the levers of power by  a limited and self perpetuating group, had his plan. It was to unceremoniously Murder all the present oligarchs and set up another group, the Communists, a  group that with no checks and balances other than his book, which would have power over all material things in this society, and would , in Marxian dream theory, see that they were all equally distributed.

Where amongst Human beings one would find these perpetually selfless and uncorrupted ones, who would  do this for no tangible reward,  and who also would have the God like knowledge of which inventions to fund and which to ignore and at what times, or  how all these happily toiling workers were to invent mange and create the intricate industrial society where all would benefit equally, were details he did not bother with, he had wrote his holy writ now it was up to his disciples to do it.

Americans , then and now pragmatists,  did not seek to eliminate the powerful and greedy, they understood that the quest for something better for oneself in life was the essential driving force for all human endeavor,  something Marx ignored. They acted just to legislate limits to the greed of the capitalists.   The Sherman Anti trust act and the Interstate commerce act and the Pure food and drug act all in the eighteen eighties, filled the bill at the time. American prosperity, squeezed in the1880’s by the monopolist forces, was substantially restored by these acts. So the Americans went back to living the good life. ( and unfortunately forgot that the Banksters were still working behind the scenes to undo all these restrictions on their rapacity)

Meanwhile back in England, Marx’s disciples founded the Communist movement and the Labour Party.  They did the same thing in all European countries,  The Banksters secret police were vigilant but because the ordinary Englishman could not be arrested for thought crime,  they could not stamp communism out. and indeed they found even in totalitarian countries like Germany and Russia,”thought crime” is impossible to obliterate by state force.  Indeed SINCE THE STATE HAD CLOSED ALL OTHER AVENUES FOR THE COMMON PEOPLE TO REDRESS THEIR GREVANCES AND THE OLIGARCHY WAS ACTING JUST AS DASTARDLY AS IT ALWAYS DOES, JUST AS MARX SAID IN HIS LITTLE BOOK, MARXISM FLOURISHED.  To any one who knows the psychology of people in a prison, this is not surprising. If one can do nothing else, dreaming of lining his tormentors up against the wall and butchering them gives a certain satisfaction. But it is not a solution to societies problems

Here in America the pressure of the greedy capitalist was less intense.  labor unions were organizing, not on Marxist principles but to act as collective bargaining agents for wages and working conditions.  Philanthropic industrialists like Carnegie and Ford gave millions for public higher education  Ford even unilaterally increased the daily factory wage two and a half times its former level. Consumerism increased production so fast that even with capitalist greed here just as bad as in Europe, any working man could make a good life for his family.

However back in Europe the never ending greed of the oligarchs was about to plunge the world in a catastrophic horror the likes the Caucasian race had not seen since the great plague.   All the Oligarchs of Europe, greedy for colonies and Empire, formed alliances and coalesced into two groups.  Then they proceeded  to conscript most of their young men, then butcher them, sending them marching unprotected into  the hell of a scientifically engineered  mass produced apocalypse. Worse, the Oligarch/Banksters  lent the money to the governments to pay for this butchery, and the common people ended up more in hock to them than ever. Europe was again in flame !! World War One was a monument to the evil of naked capitalist bankster greed.

This time through, the behind the scenes machinations of the American Banksters who  as stated before, were  intermarried with their European cousins  hoodwinked the naive academic they had supported for President, Woodrow Wilson, into dragging America into it.  That is because while we were partying on here in America , and not paying enough attention, the banksters had destroyed the independence of the Senate, taken over the currency and paved the way for fiat money, and passed an Income tax constitutional amendment so they could, run up a debt and rob us all!!

The lesson here is full stomachs and easy living breed complacency,  AND FAT COMPLACENT SHEEP ARE EASILY SHEARED!!

The Banksters have endless variations on the central  theme of stealing as much as they can any way they can.  In WW1 they played the game lend both side all the money they can possibly repay to buy munitions which the bankster owned firms make at a profit  to kill each other with.   In the nineteen twenties they had a new game. Inflate the stock market with loans to any rube the Banksters could sucker into investing. The scheme is for every dollar of his own he puts up Banksters loan him ten at a low rate to buy stock then once his savings are all invested in inflated stocks., pull  their own money out,  slow down the lending and watch the whole thing collapse like the punctured, overinflated,  balloon it was.  Next the Banksters had another Idea .

Use a fanatic bunch of German losers led by a mad man, to take that nation into another war with the Russian communists . This time they tried to fix it so the Germans would only go east rather than west, then butcher the communists and pick up the pieces dirt cheap.  This plan, otherwise known  as WW2, was totally screwed up by the fact that  Hitler may have been insanely filled with race hatred for Jews and various types of Eastern Eurpeans, but he wasn’t  stupid.  He used the Banksters money to build the German Army to juggernaut proportions, but he was not about to turn east until he anchored his right flank by occupying Czechoslovakia. And forget about a single thrust from German East Prussia through the Baltics, he made a deal with the rest of the central European  totalitarian remnants of the Austrian empire so he could attack all the Slavic nations En Mass. Then after the initial attack, he took care of France and England so they could not  stab him in the back, and only then thrust his armies  to the East.

The Banksters also forgot that the Japanese oligarchy, also no slouches at the greed game, were only waiting until the Brits got themselves tied down in another European war to take over their Asian colonies. You see, the Japanese elite did not buy into the concept that it is Ok for white men to seize land and property belonging to other peoples but not ok for Japanese to re-steal what the Brits and the French stole from the Asians!!  ( Fancy that !!  buggers didn’t know their place!!)   Pity the poor Banksters, they lost their German investment, and didn’t get to carve up Russia!! Not only that  but England,  France and all Europe were broke.  Only the money loaned to the USA was paid back with interest ,poor Banksters.  Still there were some payoffs  . The Banksters  got to keep most of the loot the Nazis stashed in Switzerland, even the gold they stole from the Jews.  And , as no surprise to anyone, the bankster recouped ,massively financing the western military build up in the “Cold war” era.

Now with the end of the cold war they needed something else  to rob. They picked up a good bit of change helping the Russian mob loot the Russian industry in the Yeltsen Era. Old Boris was too drunk to care what was happening,  But Putin put a stop to it

Not to worry, the banksters  bottomless pit of  scheming were already working on  a new idea.  The new cash cow was called Free Trade.  Here is how it works  China has hundreds of  millions of people who don’t have a job scratching out a bare existence from the soil with hand tools, people who will work for next to nothing.  Invest in Chinese factories,  make everything  there that used to be made in America and Europe, then, if you can get away with it undersell all the western factories and make a fortune.  Then keep the scheme going longer with another pump and dump  Ponzi scheme using western people’s houses as the cash cows, so they can go further into debt to buy more offshore made stuff.

This time they’ll rake in a cool  ten trillion!!  And the Americans and  Europeans!!  If they are so dumb they buy everything from China and lose  their own jobs in the process, they are much too stupid to figure out who pulled this off!!   Besides China they’ve got India and then Malaysia, an endless stream of desperate people who will work for the banksters for enough to buy a few bowls of rice to feed their kids.  What a great place this world is.. the banksters get so filthy rich they have to buy whole countries to hide it all in and  the suckers in America and Europe will work another whole generation just to buy back their homes they stole from them,  DON’T YOU JUST KNOW UNRESTRAINED LAISEE FAIRE CUTHTROAT CAPITALISM IS THE BEST GAME EVER!!!!!

So now we come to the last bankster project in progress .  The modification of the trade agreement between western European nations, which was originally designed to PROTECT European jobs against third world dumping by providing a common market for inter European trade and tariffs against the rest of the world. This has now morphed into the EU, a superstate where International capitalists will take advantage of desperate eastern European and African people to drive down wages and force the middle class back to their previous condition of serfdom. Of course the leftist proponents of this regeneration of the Roman empire, do not see it that way.  But then leftist the world over have this propensity to believe in fantastic  utopian dreams that downgrade tradition western values like family and the strictures of the Christian religion.

Getting down to the specific nuts and bolts of tyranny there are three principle avenues of attack by which various governments have enacted laws that if unchanged, will enslave western people .  I will first list, then explain each.  they are all insidious for they inexorably lead to the type of thought control by which the communists oppressed the nations behind the Iron curtain during the cold war, (and the way China still oppresses people today). This warning is important, because the United States cannot be the sole defender of individual rights in of its citizens in our world today( we obviously are having our own struggles with the globalists)  and expect the torch of human liberty to shine forth in our world.

In nations with no written constitution such as the UK, the parliament is already well on its way to creating this mischief with a series of public order acts, already on the books which can be interpreted to stifle any public criticism of the government.  There are two ways this can be accomplished.  first are the parts of the act criminalizing free speech.   They are written to enable the government to be able to criminalize criticism of anyone. The 2006 addition to the acts specifically allows criminalization of any criticism of any religion including Islam, no matter what the factual basis of that criticism, the criteria is only that it is likely to give offence and cause disorder.  For instance if you say that the Islamic practice of forced marriage or forced veiling is wrong. and some Muslim objects you can be tried and sentenced to prison.

It is to protect the rights of Americans  that we formed a constitutional government under which the Constitution CANNOT be altered by the legislature or the executive or the judiciary.  One of the main protective provisions, the list of ten which we call the “bill of rights”,  the first states simply and absolutely CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAWS ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH, OR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, OR FREEDOM OF RELIGION . . …

There is no ifs ands or buts.   Nick Griffins trials including his ‘98 trial, would not be allowed in the US A.   The persecution of people who speak or write books criticizing the barbaric practices of Islam is prohibited in our country.  As a matter of fact one here is free to speak or criticize anyone or anything subject to the common CIVIL laws of libel and slander, which give slandered people the right to seek redress and monetary compensation from those who have abused them. This remedy, available under English and American common law is ALL that is necessary to protect people from abuse. The power to ban speech, in Government hands, is the power to impose TYRANNY!!

The next type of acts I wish to talk about that are on the UK books are the banning acts, under these provisions, with hearsay  testimony allowed a magistrate,( Hearsay testimony  allowed in these proceedings, is also prohibited by the Constitution in the US) sans jury. to ban a person from an area or from any particular act, for up to three years.  The insidious part is that a person can be imprisoned for three years if he or she violates the ban, AND THE JURY AT THE SECOND TRIAL IS PROHIBITED FROM CONSIDERING WHETHER THE BAN WAS REASONABLE, OR THE VIOLATION TRIVIAL, ONLY WHETHER OR NOT IT WAS VIOLATED. WHAT IS MORE IF THE GOVERNMENT DECIDES THAT THE CHARGE IS TOO POLITICAL OR UNPOPULAR AND THE JURY MIGHT LET THE DEFENDANT GO THEY CAN HOLD A JURY-LESS TRIAL WHERE THEY CAN STILL IMPRISON PEOPLE FOR SIX MONTHS!!

The East German Stasi  had similar rules under which they operated, only they didn’t bother with the British  pro forma farce of a  trial (since the verdict is a forgone conclusion). Of course the Government says this use of banning, which in its most common form involves prohibiting people the police accuse of creating various types of disturbances from certain areas, is necessary to maintain order.  Rubbish!! If  someone commits a crime he or she should be penalized sufficiently to deter he or she from committing further crimes,  and that punishment will serve to deter others .  Banning a person from an area as a tool against crime is a de facto admission that crime is out of control and the population no longer co-operate with the police to maintain order. This all by itself is an admission that the government is no longer serving the needs of the people.

Finally the third type of laws which enslave the British, and indeed all the European people, are those made under the provisions of the various EU treaties.  These laws are literally made by unelected bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg and override any laws made by your own elected parliament.  They prevent you from protecting any Jobs or industries  allow the undermining  of Union agreements indeed the wholesale importation of low paid labor from anywhere.  As long as you are subject to the treaties there is nothing you can do about it!!

Now on all these laws Nu Labour has been the willing partner of the capitalist banksters.  The useful fools, the so called leftist intelligentsia,  whose blogs you see and whose articles you read in the Guardian repeat endlessly the nonsense that these laws all are to protect the rights of the minorities in “our multicultural society”, not having the wit to see that rapacious international CAPITALISM HAS CREATED THESE MINORITIES, REFUGEES FROM THEIR OWN LANDS WHO ARE DELIBERATELY IMPORTED TO EUROPE TO DILUTE AND DESTROY THE POWER OFTHE LOCAL INDIGINOUS PEOPLES WHO WOULD ACT OUT OF SELF PRESERVATION TO PROTECT THEIR SOCIETY.

They make the same mistake as their demigod Karl Marx, who ignored the realities of the human condition, never understood the principle, that to be just, authority must devolve to the lowest levels , and further more that all human rights are based on individual rights, AND THAT EACH GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS MUST SECURE THEIR OWN RIGHTS IN THEIR OWN HOMELAND!!    Instead the leftists bought into the unsustainable proposition that any person must be free to live and work anywhere, which ignores that fact that people in lands ravaged by their own or invader oligarchs will naturally flee to and swamp any place where standard of living, built by generations of sweat by the native people of the land, is better, essentially robbing the natives of these lands of their own prosperity.  UNDER PRAGMATIC NATIONALISM, UNWORKABLE THEORIES ARE DISCARDED, THE GOAL IS THE HAPPINESS OF THE INDIGINOUS PEOPLE, NOT ADHERANCE TO HALF BAKED THEORIES!!

So now you know and the question is what to do about it.  Well, believe it or not, The leadership of the BNP are  not  knuckle dragging  retards with Nazi tattoos, but educated men  and women,with a very clear understanding of these principles.   And if you speak to the leadership of the BNP you will see this.  That is why the policies of the BNP are so clearly written.  No other Political Party in Great Britain  understands and states that the banks have to be regulated and that the means of production individually be under the control of the individual stockholders and employees ( In Great Britain) who will benefit if the endeavor is prosperous, or lose if it is not,  foreign bankster owned conglomerates are to be carefully scrutinized to assure they are not wiping out local peoples prosperity!! The  jobs of the people of this nation need to be protected against unscrupulous rapacious international capitalism (the Banksters).

No other political party is committed to free speech, which specifically means free speech for everyone, even your opponents.  And next  The BNP will formally withdraw from the EU so it can enact these policies.  Griffin and other leaders want to interact with Europe, but will insist that interaction be mutually beneficial to British people and that each detail be subject  to review by Parliament. The BNP also believe that local matters should be in the hands of the local  councils. Finally  I believe the BNP will set about putting the UK under a written constitution where human rights are  codified, not just implied by tradition, and beyond the reach of any political  party, which may at any particular moment have a majority in Parliament, to alter, infringe, or abolish.

In the course of human events, it is times like these, times of Crisis, when societies have enough serious people who can no longer accept the status quo and gain the resolve to implement changes and improvements in the structure of their societies. This requires people to band together and to work for these changes, it is not enough to just sit back and hope that others do the work for you. Democracy means government by the people, ACTIVE involvement of the people. If you refuse to work with people who share your vision, then the changes that will improve our societies and our world may fail to overcome the resistance of the established power structure.

By ‘American Nationalist’

I grow weary of reading the comments by the weak minded who repeat the establishments lies that the BNP are like the Nazis. The dullards who write this, parrot the lies of the establishment politicians because they do not have a clue about the real political hierarchy in this world, or its true leaders, or its goals. There is a basic level of understanding any individual must achieve, before it is worthwhile engaging them in political conversation, and most people in the world have not achieved this level, so talking real politics with them is about as useful as discussing the subject with a ten year old child.

Politics is about power, and power and vast amounts of money are synonymous.

The heads of government and the political leaders know this, they understand who really controls the world, and they have agreed to serve them or they would not hold the positions that they do. That is why the “socialist” Blair and Brown and the rest of the world leaders go hat in  hand to the Bilderbergers every year. That is why all the Presidents and Prime Ministers,  Bush senior, Clinton,  Bush Jr, and Obama, Thatcher, Major, Blair, and Brown, all have or had the Trilateral Commission running their treasury departments and that is why rhetoric about whether the Tories are better than Labour or the Lib-Dems , or in the USA whether the Republicans are better than the Democrats, is a discussion for fools.

Any real populist political party must oppose the nefarious designs of the international bankers and in turn that party is going to be vilified by the establishment parties and the media, which are controlled by them.   That is reality, and those who do not understand this are brainwashed .

The leadership of the BNP are well aware that the creation of the superstate of the EU and the corresponding loss of UK sovereignty is part of a design by the western worlds moneyed elite to solidify control of the power structure of the world, by the creation of an impenetrable bureaucracy, impervious to populist concerns, and they are certainly not doing this  for the benefit of ordinary people.

Any basic philosophy of true democratic government  emphasizes distributed devolved power operating under local control, with checks and balances against abuse.  This is the opposite of what has happened in recent years, in both the USA and the UK, and is the antithesis of the EU and the proposed NAU.  There is really nothing to debate about, the BNP is currently the only hope for those Britons who wish to save their Nation  from future Chaos, to repeat a prior election cry ” It’s all about the economy, stupid!! .

I certainly agree with  the point raised by many people, objecting to the concept  of an all powerful group of  ”Banksters” controlling the western “democracies” , that they are not omniscient and  have had the share of , as many would  call them, “cockups”.  However, that does not lessen their degree of control of the political process.  I recommend the book “Tragedy and Hope” By Carrol Quigby as a starting point for further education about who they are and what they have done.  It is very thick and rather heavy going, but it is extremely well documented and an insider’s view of the system.

Historically speaking, the Merchant Bankers wrested control from the “Traditional” Norman descended landowning aristocracy  in a long struggle that began in Tudor times  and effectively  was completed when William of Orange was brought in to supplant the Stuarts.  A century and a half later,  even before the beginning of the Victorian era,  the banking families realized that the USA would eventually eclipse Great Britain  in political power and moved to co-opt the power structure by intermarrying with American powerful families and producing some of the central dynasties that control  American politics even unto this day.  You can see this clearly if you look at the history of the “Skull and Bones” society at Yale university.

The real Power of these people is that they control so much of the western world’s economic engine that any political organization has to deal with their minions, even such an anti capitalist and xenophobic organization as the Chinese Communist Party was forced to largely abandon its central principals in return for access to the world’s economic system.   Of course the lion’s share of the wealth generated by a hundred million Chinese working for a pittance in the so called “free trade” system has gone into the pockets of these super rich families and is now safely stashed in financial trusts in tax havens all over the globe. These are also the same trusts that hold on to the end of the string of financial documents that represent the debts “owed” by ordinary citizens of the western world, as these “sheeple” mortgaged their own and their children’s future to pay the difference between what their salaries would provide and the price of the goods and services the Banksters offered them.

I am sure you can understand that DEBT IS SLAVERY and those who own the debt, rule the slaves.

There is one weakness in the Banksters control of this system and it is that a national government has the power to declare some financial instruments illegitimate and to regulate interest due on ALL of them.  Even more important, since the primary or consumer end of these chain of banks were the ones caught in the squeeze between what their  ”Bankster” owners demanded in interest, and what their financially destitute borrowers could actually pay,  the governments intervention with nationally owned tax payer funded IOU’s has given these governments  a seat at the table, so to speak, in what was supposedly (on paper)  a private struggle between the people and the Banksters.

Griffin and company propose to utilise this nationalist power to the maximum, and the large level of support for the BNP is what has got the Banksters  knickers, all in a twist. I suggest you go to the web site, listen to some of the financial videos and read a little bit on the financial treatise “the third way”.

I am sure when intelligent people reflect on all of what has  REALLY happened in our nations during the last centuries,  we can see that organizing, EDUCATING, and electing, activist controlled, broad based populist political parties to run our governments is essential in neutralizing this dangerous concentration of power in the hands of a selfish and  intensely greedy band of thieves.

I submit that it is important to distribute concise, but fairly comprehensive treatises on the actual history , current structure , and  future designs of the financial oligarchy, and the horrific effects of these designs on ordinary people, together with the BNP’s proposals to counter these forces.  These need to be distributed and discussed amongst university students, who are now subject to a thought control regimen on campus enforced by the power structures  useful idiots, the Marxist goons, who are permitted by the authorities to run amok at these institutions and literally assault all those who would disagree with them.  It is time for a new revolution on Campus.

By ‘American Nationalist’