UAF Intimidate Durham Students
Once again Unite Against Fascism (UAF) have scuppered interactive democracy. Reminding us of one of their infamous lines: ‘ We believe in freedom of speech but not for fascists’ . Obviously oblivious to the fact that the opposite is declared as soon as their representative uttered ‘but’.
As much as these fools like to claim that they’re ‘concerned local residents’, for the most part they are parachuted in from all over the UK. At Durham University, the decision to allow or not to allow active democracy should have been a decision taken by the student union, as elected officials. Not by failed students of the 60’s and the young social-retards of the UAF.
These extreme leftists peddled the usual lies in order to shut the debate down; the violent BNP thugs will turn up. THIS IS A LIE. The BNP does not engage in street protests, save in exceptional circumstances, such as the ‘free speech’ trial of Nick Griffin. Why would BNP supporters turn up to a University debate, it’s a function for the students alone.
This is an outdated tactic by the UAF, it’s designed to goad us into rolling in the streets with them, there can only be ‘violence’ if the UAF turn out to attack us. This would provide local and/or national rags with the pictures to accompany articles describing us as violent fascists. They’re frustrated because we don’t do street marches or violence. In fact, it is the UAF that engages in fascistic tactics. Clawhammer attacks, spitting in the face of disabled children and surrounding lone BNP supporters.
It is this simple.
Q – If, as claimed, our arguments are so ’stupid’, surely these students will see through them? Where is the need to stop us putting them forth?
A – It is precisely because our arguments are growing in popularity and acceptance that they want us silenced. The UAF and the broader leftist movement cannot counter us via argument. They have nothing left to offer but fists and boots, and they know it. Sadly, our supporters have experienced the power of the leftist’s argument – normally resulting in a visit to A and E.
Furthermore, this wasn’t just an attack on the BNP, this was an attack on every student that wanted to challenge our stance. It is up to ‘mainstream’ party supporters – and students – to stop these extremists. Do not be intimidated by these people. They’re communists at heart, and that translates as an inherent cowardice, they fear the freedom to fail.
The BNP has its hands tied. I will give my warning though, any UAF that gets up in my face will be picking his teeth up off the floor – I will stick the head on you, in self-defence of course.
The newspapers call us ‘fascists’, ‘extremists’, ‘racists’ etc but they never call us liars.
The uaf are trying to convince everyone that if they have anything to do with or vote for the bnp they will be paving the way to a new nazi Germany.look at all the groups on facebook etc.’the bnp are nazis’. We have to convince these moron this is certainly not the case.
This shower of shit has the temerity to call the BNP racist whilst hiding behind the race card.
These Mugabee-ites speak of equality, but not for the BNP.
Sad bunch of thick, uneducated, unwashed, undesirable, unwanted, united against freedom and anti-British Ba****ds
Good article glad you are back!
UAF dont intimidate anyone…
they just think they do.
silly little people with something to hide (hence been TERRIFIED of the BNP).
funniest quote EVER from weyman 'bongo' bennett after EDL stoke demo.
'we defended the square from 3 attacks by facists'…eh?
we know weymans a pathalogical liar and much hated in the UAF (joint 1st place with kettleon tossoffski in the most hated by our own UAF members category) but what planet do these people live on…WAY too many magic mushrooms.
UAF?………the very dregs of society, a laughable bunch indeed.
Ah, this amuses me. UAF, full of fail as usual. There's no law that says all free speech must be pleasant. Indeed, the right to voice an unpleasant and obnoxious as an opinion as one chooses is a vital tool in promoting debate. I'll certainly concede you BNP fans do that in spades, which is all to the good.
The comment about the UAF acting violently is deadly accurate, too. I've seen tacit admissions of this on their supporters blogs, comments about breaking through police lines for the purpose of 'getting at the nazis' in reference to the EDL protests.
Still, Editor, that picture is a clear attempt to smear the opposition as 'perverts and mutants' isn't it? Hardly sporting, while it's predictable from that knuckle dragger Kevin, I hoped for better from someone with your intellectual capacity.
Anyway, I must retire for a meal at the pub and then my hobby of drinking until I fall into a ditch. See you soon, nationalists.
Naggedbycats, this is politics. I'm not above striking a low blow for my party.
'perverts and mutants'
LMFAO
Considering the history of your own party complaining of unwarranted smears from numerous sources, for one of their activists to indulge in similar activities seems a rather … curious position.
Regardless, I have to admit that it's this kind of tactic from politicos is one of the issues that has me glancing at lamp posts whenever anyone attempts to impress upon me their desire for me to vote for almost any of the parties.
P.S. Lack of denial noted.
LOL, It's an image of some UAF demonstrators. Should I have used an image of their logo? That image is priceless and I will exploit it at every opportunity.
This isn't unwarranted or unfounded, the UAF clearly has perverts and mutants within their ranks, as you confirmed.
Win at all costs; smash the UAF!
Well, I've sat and ruminated on your statement for a while. Ultimately, my displeasure over your use of that image comes down to the fact it's a blatant appeal to emotion. So what if they're perverts and mutants, that fact does ot render their arguments moot, any more than the same applies to those you propose for your association with, shall we say, certain… outspoken individuals with rather… interesting views.
Emotion isn't a good thing to base our society on. Emotion is often wrong, my own arachnophobia provides simple evidence of that. This is not, at this point, to suggest your own arguments are wrong ( I actually agree with the BNP on some points.. ), but where I come from, such tactics are considered evidence of poor logic.
Finally. I've told you about that slogan before. Once again, if you mean what you say, I've the chemical formulae and various other data that would probably stand you in good stead for such an attempt. They are yours on demand, simply due to my desire to see a less ordered society.
Additionally, might I add my pleasure at seeing you blogging again. Much as I disagree with you, I have a lot of respect for the fact that you on the 'right' of the political spectrum will actually debate, rather than resorting to silly emotionality designed to silence dissent.