The British Nationalist

Here follows an intercepted email from Mike Easter, member of the British National Party (BNP) reform group. You may recall that the odious activities of the reform group were covered in an earlier article here. Chris Jackson – the leader of the group and would-be fuhrer of the BNP – has since claimed that he is going to join the National Front (NF).

Hi,

Since writing the attached, the BNP accounts are still not in to the Electoral Commission.  Also Griffin has been consorting with Fiore and other foreigners of very dubious reputation.  He is now making certain that the BNP General Election campaign in Barking, where Richard Barnbrook was to stand, will be a fiasco.  NG has deserted the North West almost as soon as he was elected.

Some people have actually already transfered to the NF including Steve Smith of Burnley fame.

Others are waiting to hear the result of a NF directorate meeting on 5th December at which, we hope, Ian Edward will be confirmed as NF Chairman.

Ian, I am sure he won’t mind me saying, is a steady lad and intends to keep to the NF Constitution.

This Constitution is just the one that the BNP should have, but hasn’t.

Regards,

Mike Easter

Attachment

The situation is currently very confused for nationalists. (Perhaps less confusing now that Griffin has come out of the closet!)  There is no apparent best option.   All options have serious downsides.  Let’s consider the following:

1.  Continue in the BNP and attempt to reform it.

2.  Rejoin the NF, effectively transferring the trained personnel from the BNP into the NF.

3.  Go with Dem Nats.

4.  Do nothing.

The BNP is by far the largest of the nationalist groups. However, it suffers from having a dictatorial structure consequent on its ludicrous Constitution. It has a very high turnover of members and most members are unschooled in nationalist politics. Indeed it is now becoming difficult to describe it as a racial nationalist party.

The NF is tiny but has, over the last year or two, grown appreciably. It does have a proper Constitution and that potentially means that it can grow and develop in a satisfactory way. (The de facto leader is now Ian Edward.)

The Democratic Nationalists is effectively a ‘shell’ and has very limited membership but is registered with the Electoral Commission. It has a Constitution that would allow for growth and development.

Before making a personal decision, I would like to get a feeling for others opinions. My feeling is that the BNP is going nowhere. Consequently, making an enormous effort to reform the BNP, remove dud personnel and then train the members in nationalism will be time and energy wasted.

The NF is very small but contains well motivated nationalists and has a Constitution that allows for the party to grow and is controlled by the members.

The Democratic Nationalists seem to be in a similar situation to the NF but only just starting out.

I have deliberately not mentioned individuals in this brief note. However, in the cases of the NF, and also the DNs, it would be possible at the respective annual general meetings to remove individuals from positions of authority, who are in some way unsatisfactory. This has not been possible in the case of the BNP due to its Constitution.

Personally, I am inclined to put my effort into the NF because, first of all they are genuine racial nationalists, and secondly they potentially can grow rapidly if the long term BNP members, including those that have been thrown out by Griffin, join them. These are people already trained.

‘Dem Nats’ refers to the independent nationalist candidates that the reform group intends to stand against BNP candidates in the general election, under the Democratic Nationalist label. Some Dem Nat candidates have already been selected to stand in Bradford and Burnley.

Point 1 is the option that the reform group is currently employing, subversive tactics laid out in the infamous six point plan. We’re hearing of some bizarre little games being played out at recent BNP meetings in the North; showing of hands, people storming out of rooms.  A bemused member whom attended one of the meetings and witnessed Jackson’s latest stunt, said:

‘He (Jackson) launched into a tirade about Nick Griffin, and at the end asked us if we still supported the leader or him, only about 12 out of 60 people put their hand up for him. He said that when he got to power he’d hang all those whom voted for the amendments. We’re calling him Wacko Jacko, he’s losing the plot.’

The NF appears to be ecstatic at the moment. It seems that members of the National Front’s directorate –  a member of which is the hilariously inept Eddy Morrison – are under pressure to select the ‘right’ chairman, before any of the reform group will join them, they’re holding the NF to ransom, not the best way to enter into a new alliance. A source tells us that whomever is selected will be considered as somebody who is easily cast aside when Chris Jackson decides he wants to become the Chairman.

The NF are claiming that they’re going to see a big increase in membership, mainly driven by dissatisfaction amongst the nutzis about the upcoming BNP member ballot on the constitutional amendments. The vote is expected to favour the proposals offered by Nick Griffin. The party has confirmed that despite the amendments our ethno-nationalist ideology, and our policies, will remain intact. What’s the problem?

Well, BNP members and supporters should not be fooled. These people are not threatening to leave because of the constitutional amendments forced on us by the establishment, they are people with a pathological hatred of the current leadership, and especially Nick Griffin. They have been sitting in a run-down pub, belittling the success of the party and praying for Nick to trip up, in some cases they have been waiting for that day for 30 years. They can wait on, preferably from the politically insignificant sidelines of the National Front.