The British Nationalist

I make apologies to the folks that have email subscribed to this site and have received this expletive laden post in your inbox. If bad language offends, please don’t read on. Thanks.

There was an eye-opening discussion on the Green Arrow paltalk last night. Mainly centred around the masturbatory adulation of Geert Wilders. Now, myself and a few other gentlemen expressed our lukewarm attitude towards Mr Wilders, having doubts about his international ties and motives. Not forgetting his, shall we say, less than respectful attitude towards the BNP.

Well, fuck me! Oh, you’d think it was heresy to question dear Geert. The attitude of the reprobates in that room confirmed some of the fears of my fellow ethno-nationalists:

1.) The party has focused upon Islamification for so long that it has attracted supporters whom have no other raison d’etre.

2.) Some members have absolutely no ideological grounding. Most don’t know what nationalism is, let alone ethno-nationalism.

The general consensus, lead by Bertie Bert, seems to be the belief that it’s Black & White: Wilders attacks Islam therefore Wilders is a Nationalist. Umm, hang on a minute, Wilders is a neo-con. The only major area that the BNP and his party share is an opposition to Islamification, little else.

This ideological indifference has permeated right down into the youngest of our supporters, the vile little prick known as ‘SAFCMAN’ conducted a disgraceful interview with the star of ‘Young Angry and White’, the ‘in-crowd’ applauded this reprobate like a bunch of circus seals. You may sense some anger in this paragraph. Well, that’s because SAFCMAN described me as Hitler. Him not having the intellect to understand why I do the things that I do for the good of the party.

It seems that SAFCMAN has been recorded telling racist jokes and using racial slurs, as a result of allowing communists and nazis to participate in his chatroom. Once again justifying the action I took to protect the fragile reputation of the party.

Not having a high tolerance for bullshit and stupidity, I carried on questioning the pronouncements that Wilders is ‘on our side’. Which lead to the questioning of my political allegiance. ‘I think you’re actually working against us’, said Bertie Bert.

I believe that this goes back to my insistence that Alby Walker was going to stand against Simon Darby. The newspaper that broke the story carried a DIRECT QUOTE from Alby saying that he was going to stand and that he needed £500 (which just happened to be the exact amount for an parliamentary election deposit). Oh no no no, I was just stirring up trouble, Alby wasn’t standing there, I’d bought the paper’s lies hook line and sinker, apparently.

Apparently not, I was right all along.

Who else has bothered to explained the basis of their nationalist beliefs? Such as I  have (Here). Laying open my sentiments to the criticism of others. That’s right, none of my accusers.

Who else does more to protect the image of the party? Going against the tide of people that can’t keep their stupid fucking mouths shut; making enemies of strangers that would, in other circumstances, be counted as friends.

I do have personality clashes with some people, but it’s illogical to jump from thinking somebody is a prick, to thinking they must be infiltrators.

Foreword

This question was posed by a potential supporter; what follows is my subjective response. I hope you will add your thoughts and feelings on the question, to the comments section below.

M. Wood

You’re either a Nationalist or an Internationalist. Britain has arguably been internationalist since the beginning of our Empire-building. Some say Britain is run by, or for, the interest of big business. Big multinational conglomerates.

Britain has existed for too long as nothing more than a collection of consumers with a handy army should anything or anyone threaten the money-maker’s designs. At the height of Empire, Britain had 4 million unemployed at home; is internationalism nothing more than the ability to exploit cheap foreign labour at the expense of one’s own people? Demanding that these people, who once made commodities with their own hands, purchase products made by the hands of those whom now have their jobs and livelihood.

Sure, you can earn £20k in the service industry, but come retirement, what have you done but been a conduit between your people and internationalist corporations? Worse still, you may have traded your man power to produce wealth for other nations and peoples. After 45 years of work, you have not produced anything that will outlast you. There’s no testament to your existence, you did not produce anything, bar digits on a screen or worthless paper money.

Contrast this with the British archaeological artifacts such as jewellery or instruments of toil. They stand as a record of the daily-life of our ancestors, they have soul because they were made by human hand and mind. A visit to Stonehenge is an almost spiritual experience for those in pursuit of a connection with their ancestors. They leave an indelible mark that speaks to you from ages past – ‘we were here, we lived, we loved and we died.’

I am a nationalist because being British is more than just reverence for some hero involved in a glorious battle-field story from our rich history, or some cultural practice that is under siege from PC bureaucracy. No, it’s more tangible than that. Nationalists stand to protect and promote a nation’s most valuable asset, something real – its people.

‘I pay my taxes!’ Cry the recent arrivals, as if this is the major factor in judging one’s claims that they’re British. Our people have paid taxes, generation after generation. Our forebears paid a higher price, paid in blood, during the internationalist elites’ political repositioning on continental chessboards.

Of course, there are people facing hardship in the world. The hardship of our ancestors is not taught; is it taught that the life expectancy of early Britons was once just 24? Or that British mothers would often commit infanticide — murdering their babies — in anticipation of crop failures? Our people came through famine, plague, warfare and oppression – never abandoning this island when circumstances conspired to persuade them that emigration was the answer. They stayed and weathered the times. Would those almost broken people have persevered if they could foresee the dispossession of their lands when entrusted to our generation’s stewardship?

But all of this does not answer the question. Understanding of the hardship experienced by our people and the overall human story of our Island, this human history will endear you to British Nationalism. If it doesn’t? Then you have no heart, no soul; you have no national empathy and you cannot describe yourself as British. Let alone a British Nationalist.

‘We’re all human’, spit the multicultists and it is only human to desire to live amongst your own people in your own land.

300 of the BNP membership voted yes to constitutional amendments allowing ethnic minorities to join the party.

Good.

As for the opponents, they’re now trying to claim that the motion couldn’t have been carried because thousands of members did not vote. It was a party-wide ballot; they knew where the EGM was to be held. Claiming that Northern members couldn’t get down to the south is laughable, if it was held in the North, how would the Southern members attend?

I’m sure many of you will have watched Young, Angry and White on Channel 4 last Friday, if not, here’s the link – It is highly recommended.

Despite the blurb describing the documentary, the short film isn’t really about the BNP. The star of the show, 19-yr-old Kieren, says that he is considering joining the BNP.

At first, you imagine the usual caricature. Some young, chavvy bloke who left school at 14. Not in this case! I was quite impressed with Kieren, he understands his ideology and was able to put it forward in a manner that many older nationalists couldn’t.

However, when the camera crew attended his BBQ, you will have noticed the flags draped over his garden fence. I knew then that this lad was going to have issues with the BNP’s direction – he is a racial-nationalist, the BNP are not.  His water and ink analogy made me cringe, I’m not saying he was incorrect, biologically speaking he is correct, it was just a very crude way of explaining the concept to a group of young, mugsheeple.

You quickly get the impression that Kieren has been influenced by some of the more eccentric nationalists. I know he has been because I’ve read his posts on the Stormfront forum, not exactly the best place to learn about political nationalism.

Near the end of the footage Kieren discovers that we’re making amendments to our constitution. He doesn’t like it, and so he joins the National Front. Which makes a mockery of the documentary as I believe there was never any question of him joining the BNP. He is a racial-nationalist and – as a young lad – he is attracted to the grittier factions of nationalism. (Before anybody says that the BNP is a racial nationalist party, it isn’t. The new constitution states that we are ethno-nationalist)

I feel that Kieren is too good for the NF, he will probably rise rapidly within the organisation, as he actually has a brain. Then again, hopefully, he will see the dead-end that is political racial-nationalism and ‘modify’ (I prefer upgrade) his ideology.

The documentary appears to be ‘bigging up’ the NF, which of course makes sense to the enemies of nationalism. Austria has two successful nationalist parties, combined they could  probably win control of the country, whilst apart, they are competing against each other and their potential is diluted.

I don’t believe that it had very much to do with the BNP but it is still worth watching. Channel 4 have been a little bit sly, they purposely didn’t pick the stereotypical young, white male that I described earlier. If they did, it is easier to laugh at that caricature and pretend we’re all just thick, little bigots on the fringes of society. Channel 4 has chosen a normal lad, albeit an ideologue – for one reason; It scares people.

It’s still quite a shame to lose a recruit of Kieren’s quality.

The reds over at the blog named ‘Ex-BNP Members Bringing you the truth’ (lol), have threatened the BNP candidates standing In Manchester with ‘ethnic gangs’.

In the most recent disjointed rant, the author said:

“stop and think for a minute ,,,,,you have an outsider standing in my town , i have true friends,ethnic gangs and also contacts in high places.

Sleep well liars and Nazi’s”

The blog quotes Albert Einstein – ‘Any darn fool can make something complex: but it takes a genius to make something simple’.

Well, the author of this blog does neither; instead specialising in nonsense, lies, threats and intimidation.

Oh, and apparently, I’m a ‘nutzy’ [sic]. That’s not likely to wash, myself having been a rather outspoken opponent of the Nutzis.

We eagerly await the next batch of bull.

Once again Unite Against Fascism (UAF) have scuppered interactive democracy. Reminding us of one of their infamous lines: ‘ We believe in freedom of speech but not for fascists’ . Obviously oblivious to the fact that the opposite is declared as soon as their representative uttered ‘but’.

As much as these fools like to claim that they’re ‘concerned local residents’, for the most part they are parachuted in from all over the UK. At Durham University, the decision to allow or not to allow active democracy should have been a decision taken by the student union, as elected officials. Not by failed students of the 60’s and the young social-retards of the UAF.

These extreme leftists peddled the usual lies in order to shut the debate down; the violent BNP thugs will turn up. THIS IS A LIE. The BNP does not engage in street protests, save in exceptional circumstances, such as the ‘free speech’ trial of Nick Griffin. Why would BNP supporters turn up to a University debate, it’s a function for the students alone.

This is an outdated tactic by the UAF, it’s designed to goad us into rolling in the streets with them, there can only be ‘violence’ if the UAF turn out to attack us. This would provide local and/or national rags with the pictures to accompany articles describing us as violent fascists. They’re frustrated because we don’t do street marches or violence. In fact, it is the UAF that engages in fascistic tactics. Clawhammer attacks, spitting in the face of disabled children and surrounding lone BNP supporters.

It is this simple.

Q – If, as claimed, our arguments are so ’stupid’, surely these students will see through them? Where is the need to stop us putting them forth?

A – It is precisely because our arguments are growing in popularity and acceptance that they want us silenced. The UAF and the broader leftist movement cannot counter us via argument. They have nothing left to offer but fists and boots, and they know it. Sadly, our supporters have experienced the power of the leftist’s argument – normally resulting in a visit to A and E.

Furthermore, this wasn’t just an attack on the BNP, this was an attack on every student that wanted to challenge our stance. It is up to ‘mainstream’ party supporters – and students – to stop these extremists. Do not be intimidated by these people. They’re communists at heart, and that translates as an inherent cowardice, they fear the freedom to fail.

The BNP has its hands tied. I will give my warning though, any UAF that gets up in my face will be picking his teeth up off the floor – I will stick the head on you, in self-defence of course.

The newspapers call us ‘fascists’, ‘extremists’, ‘racists’ etc but they never call us liars.

Hello readers.

Just a couple of questions for you.

1.) Can you please comment beneath this post if you are linking to us, so we can reciprocate. We haven’t got the full list of regional nationalists, and the blogs that linked to us in the past.

2.) I believe some of you are still receiving email updates from this site?

Thanks Guys

It has been revealed that the Conservatives and Labour had planned to cooperate to keep BNP leader Nick Griffin out of parliament. Tory strategists had agreed to not stand a candidate against Nick, only changing their mind when ‘anti-fascists’ warned them what a stupid idea it was.

“Under the proposal, the Tories would have agreed not to put up a candidate against Mrs Hodge in the hope of giving her a better chance of defeating the far-right party leader at the next general election.

But the plan was killed off after anti-fascist group Searchlight said that the pact could backfire by fuelling Mr Griffin’s victim status.”

Yet more proof of the close-knit relations between the tweedle-dee, tweedle dum parties, and the sham democratic system in the UK. Standing against Nick in a straight forward, democratic battle is apparently out of the question. Just in case they don’t agree with the results of the electorate exercising their democratic rights – and Nick Griffin wins.

This probably would have backfired, and unfortunately, Gerry Gable has been in this game a long time.

http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/713/davidcameronspactwithgo.jpg

Over the past few weeks there has been a sharp increase in the amount of anti-BNP agitators. They’ve tried to embed themselves into the social network, the chat rooms and the blogs – even creating a few new blogs.

With this in mind, it was decided to resurrect the old site, but not running at the same level as the previous ‘magazine’ site. Hence the more minimal styling. Some of you will be happy to hear that I managed to salvage all the author’s posts and comments, others less so.

In the coming weeks the British National Party membership will be making the biggest decision ever asked of them. Our enemies know this, they hope that by some interference they can drive a wedge into the membership, causing splits or factions.

The newest little addition to the anti-BNP blog army is claiming that it represents 70+ ex-BNP members. However, the description gives the game away:

“A GROWING GROUP OF EX PARTY MEMBERS TO EXPOSE THE HIDDEN AGENDA OF THIS VICIOUS PARTY TO MEMBERS OF THE VOTING PUBLIC AND TO CURRENT UNSUSPECTING MEMBERS WHO ARE BEING BRAINWASHED.

ANY EX MEMBERS WHO HAVE TRUE EVENTS AND STORIES TO TELL THEN PLEASE GET IN TOUCH.”

Now, the majority of ex-members have left because they believe the party has moved away from its original ideology. Some believe the party isn’t ‘vicious’ enough, they certainly don’t think it has grown too aggressive for them since Nick Griffin took over in 1999. So, who else thinks the party is ‘vicious’, couldn’t be our anti-fascist pals, could it?

Secondly, the blog author is claiming that they have raised £4,000 to stand independent candidates against BNP parliamentary candidates. The reasoning behind the move raises further questions about those running the blog, and their real agenda:

“The only reason we will do this is to strategically split the votes and Help to lose the BNP their deposits , We have no political agenda other than to Protect the General public from these Crooks whom are just wanting to bleed the country dry.”

Right, because if you wanted to raid the country’s bare coffers you would pick a small, fringe nationalist party as a vehicle to do it, wouldn’t you? Nonsense. And nonsense is what constitutes the vast majority of the postings on the site. The facts can be found if only you search.

The final piece of evidence offered up should leave you in no doubt as to the nature of the people behind it. Every post labels a senior activist or official as a ‘racist’, including Martin Wingfield, Michael Elliot, Clive Jefferson, and Eddy Butler.

There is a twist – the site claims to be run by our pals from the now defunct BNP reform group. The site author considers the National Front as a ‘viable alternative’ to the BNP, yet perceives no irony in labelling BNP folk as racist, whilst attempting to reconstruct a racial-nationalist party. Perhaps this development lends weight to those who claimed that the reformists weren’t interested in politics, merely interested in bringing the BNP down. If this isn’t the case, you have to ask why they haven’t simply taken their skills to the National Front and let us get on with our political activities.

You can view the pitiful blog here. Let them know what you think of their lies and schemes.

—————————————————————————–

Last night’s meeting of the BNP’s Croydon branch, attracted some ethnic minority pub-goers. The two men were peering through the window, wondering why the large crowd were gathering, upon being spotted, some elderly BNP veterans waved for them to come in and join the meeting.

The two men – one asian; one afro-carribean – enjoyed the talks by Richard Barnbrook AM, and had lots of questions. One being: “how can we get this country back to the way it was?”

The Asian gentleman explained that he was a British army veteran, which was greeted by a warm, respectful applause from the BNP members.

A member present at the meeting, reports:

“He also said he had a mixed race child and he does not like political correctness, they were asked to become members at a later date, i’m not sure if they will.  I think they were quite happy to a stumbled apon a BNP meeting, something to talk about with their mates. I think they were very curious and hopefully came away with the knowledge that the BNP are very different as to how they are portrayed in the MSM, on my way out I gave one of them one of my DVD’s, me and my mate make them, it is a newspaper in a DVD format, presenting news that is censored in the MSM, anyway he was happy with that and said he’d watch.

They were made very welcome, who said the BNP can’t be inclusive?”

I know some are worried about how they will manage ethnic minority members. The answer is simple, the answer is contained within the BNP’s philosophy towards ethnic minorities; treat them exactly the same as you would any other member, no condescending lovefest and certainly nothing that would constitute bad manners. Common sense stuff.

A very small minority may stop coming to meetings if ethnic minorities attend. I would question how on earth they function in a multi-racial society (you may not like it, but it’s a fact of life for most people living in large cities) if they cannot even bring themselves to sit next to an ethnic minority. Have their careers never once brought them into contact with minority customers or colleagues? If so, did they shun or run from them, rather than engage?

Some have foretold large invasions of meetings by searchlight plants. You can counter this by making all your meetings strictly members only, no card; no entry, regardless of race, ethnicity, etc.

This could all turn out to be academic as the amendments are yet to be ratified by the membership. If you wish to vote on the constitutional amendments then you must attend the Emergency General Meeting on the 30th/31st of January 2010.

Hat-tip: Political Mizz